Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Effect of applied potassium on nutrient contents of rice grown in three soils

  • 41 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Summary

Out of various soil and plant test methods tested for predicting response of rice to K application in soils of a rice growing valley region the Hanway and Heidal extractant neutralN NH4 OAc turned out to be the best. The critical limit of extractable K was 160 ppm by the Hanway and Heidal extractant, and by the Bray's reagent 175 ppm. Critical K level in the rice plant is 0.4%. Correlations between the extractable K and K uptake were highly positive for various extractants: Hanway and Heidal, Morgan, Hunter and Pratt No. 2, Blanchet and Perigand and MacLean. Although majority of the soils of the region was Inceptisols followed by Alfisols and Vertisols, all soil types had a similar available nutrient status and a similar pattern in relative grain yields. K response was noticeable in Alfisols with respect to grain and straw yields. The grain P concentration in Vertisols, and straw K in Alfisols indicated the contribution of K towards the productivity of two soil groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Arora B R and Kanwar J S 1969 J. Res. (P.A.U.) 6, 325–330.

  2. 2

    Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington D.C. Twelfth Edition, 1970.

  3. 3

    Bansal K Net al. Plant and Soil, 70, 133–140.

  4. 4

    Blanchet R and Perigaud S 1960 Annls. Agron. 11, 347.

  5. 5

    Branner W 1978 in Soils and Rice IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 35–55.

  6. 6

    Bray R H 1948 H B Kitchen (ed.) Diagnostic Techniques for soils and crops, Amer. Potash Inst.

  7. 7

    Cate R B Jr. and Nelson A L 1965 Tech. Bull. Int. Soil Testing 1.

  8. 8

    Dyer B 1894 J. Chem. Soc. 65, 115.

  9. 9

    Hanway J J and Heidal H 1952 Iowa, Agron. 57.

  10. 10

    Hunter A H and Pratt P F 1957 Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 21, 595.

  11. 11

    Jaworski C A and Barber S R 1959 Soil Sci. 87, 37–41.

  12. 12

    Johnson C M and Ulrich A 1959 Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 766.

  13. 13

    Kanwar J S 1974 Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Potash Institute, Budapest.

  14. 14

    MacLean A J 1961 Can. J. Soil Sci. 41, 196–206.

  15. 15

    Mishra B, Tripathi B R and Chauhan R P S 1970 J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 18, 21–26.

  16. 16

    Morgan M F 1951 Bull. Conn. Agric. Exp. Sta., 450.

  17. 17

    Oh W K 1979 Nitrogen and Rice IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 435–439.

  18. 18

    Parte J Ket al. 1971 J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci., Ferti. 4, 27–32.

  19. 19

    Reitemeir R F 1951 Soil Potassium, Adv. Agron., 3, 113–164.

  20. 20

    Stevenson F J 1966In Soil Biochemistry, Eds. A D McLarea and G H Petersen, Dekker N.Y. p 169.

  21. 21

    Yamane I and Okazaki M 1982In Vertisols and Rice Soils of the Tropics, 12th Internatl. Cong. Soil Sci., New Delhi, pp 143–157.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansal, K.N., Bhadoria, U.P.S. & Dube, J.N. Effect of applied potassium on nutrient contents of rice grown in three soils. Plant Soil 84, 275–278 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143190

Download citation

Key words

  • Applied potassium effect
  • Soil groups