Advertisement

Numerical Algorithms

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 221–239 | Cite as

A multiprojection algorithm using Bregman projections in a product space

  • Yair Censor
  • Tommy Elfving
Article

Abstract

Generalized distances give rise to generalized projections into convex sets. An important question is whether or not one can use within the same projection algorithm different types of such generalized projections. This question has practical consequences in the area of signal detection and image recovery in situations that can be formulated mathematically as a convex feasibility problem. Using an extension of Pierra's product space formalism, we show here that a multiprojection algorithm converges. Our algorithm is fully simultaneous, i.e., it uses in each iterative stepall sets of the convex feasibility problem. Different multiprojection algorithms can be derived from our algorithmic scheme by a judicious choice of the Bregman functions which govern the process. As a by-product of our investigation we also obtain blockiterative schemes for certain kinds of linearly constraned optimization problems.

Keywords

Non-orthogonal projections convex feasibility problem bregman's generalized distance 

Subject classification

90 C25 90 C30 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H.H. Bauschke and J.M. Borwein, On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems, Research Report 93-12, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada (June 1993).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A Ben-Israel and T.N.E. Greville,Generalized Inverses, Theory and Applications (Wiley, 1974).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L.M. Bregman, The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming, USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 7 (1967) 200–217.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Butnariu and Y. Censor, On the behavior of a block-iterative projection method for solving convex feasibility problems. Int. J. Comp. Math. 34 (1990) 79–94.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.L. Byrne, Iterative image reconstruction algorithms based on cross-entropy minimization, IEEE Trans. Image Proc. IP-2 (1993) 96–103.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. Censor, Row-action methods for huge and sparse systems and their applications, SIAM Rev. 23 (1981) 444–464.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Censor, A.R. De Pierro, T. Elfving, G.T. Herman and A.N. Iusem, On iterative methods for linearily constrained entropy maximization, in:Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, ed. A. Wakulicz, Banach Center Publications (PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, Poland, 1990) pp. 145–163.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y. Censor and A. Lent, An iterative row-action method for interval convex programming, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 34 (1981) 321–353.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Y. Censor and J. Segman, On block-iterative entropy maximization. J. Inf. Optim. Sci. 8 (1987) 275–291.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Censor, Parallel application of block-iterative methods in medical imaging and radiation therapy, Math. Progr. 42 (1988) 307–325.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. Censor and S.A. Zenios, Proximal maximization algorithm with D-functions, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 73 (1992) 451–464.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    P.L. Combettes, The foundations of set theoretic estimation, Proc. IEEE 81 (1993) 182–208.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    I. Csiszár, Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems. Ann. Statist. 19 (1991) 2032–2066.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.N. Darroch and D. Ratcliff, Generalized iterative scaling for log-linear models, Ann. Math. Statist. 43 (1972) 1470–1480.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A.R. De Pierro and A.N. Iusem, A relaxed version of Bregman's method for convex programming, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 51 (1986) 421–440.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Eckstein, Nonlinear proximal point algorithms using Bregman functions, with applications to convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 18 (1993) 202–226.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    P.P.B. Eggermont, G.T. Herman and A. Lent, Iterative algorithms for large partitioned linear systems, with applications to image reconstruction, Lin. Alg. Appl. 40 (1981) 37–67.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P.P.B. Eggermont, Multiplicative iterative algorithms for convex programming, Lin. Alg. Appl. 130 (1990) 25–42.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Elfving, Block-iterative methods for consistent and inconsistent linear equations, Numer. Math. 35 (1980) 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Elfving, On some methods for entropy maximization and matrix scaling, Lin. Alg. Appl. 34 (1980) 321–339.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Elfving, An algorithm for maximum entropy image reconstruction from noisy data, Math. Comp. Mod. 12 (1989) 729–745.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    L.G. Gubin, B.T. Polyak and E.V. Raik, The method of projection for finding the common point of convex sets, USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 7 (1967) 1–24.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    S.P. Han, A successive projection method, Math. Progr. 40 (1988) 1–14.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    N.E. Hurt,Phase Retrieval and Zero Crossings: Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    A.N. Iusem, On dual convergence and the rate of primal convergence of Bregman's convex programming method, SIAM J. Optim. 1 (1991) 401–423.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    A.N. Iusem, and A.R. De Pierro, On the convergence of Han's method for convex programming with quadratic objective, Math. Progr. 52 (1991) 265–284.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    L.K. Jones and C.L. Byrne, General entropy criteria for inverse problems, with application to data compression, pattern classification and cluster analysis, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-36 (1990) 23–30.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    K.C. Kiwiel, Block-iterative surrogate projection methods for convex feasibility problems, Technical Report, Systems Research Inst., Polish Academy of Sciences, Newelska 6, 01-447, Warsaw, Poland (December 1992).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. Kotzer, N. Cohen and J. Shamir, Extended and alternative projections onto convex sets: theory and applications, Technical Report No. EE 900, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel (November 1993).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    G. Pierra, Decomposition through formalization in a product space. Math. Progr. 28 (1984) 96–115.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1970).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    H. Stark (ed.),Image Recovery: Theory and Applications (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1987).Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    A.E. Taylor,Introduction to Functional Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Teboulle, Entropic proximal mappings with applications to nonlinear programming, Math. Oper. Res. 17 (1992) 670–690.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yair Censor
    • 1
  • Tommy Elfving
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations