Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 313–330 | Cite as

Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments

  • Kathleen M. Galotti
  • Steven F. Kozberg
Article

Abstract

Sixty-eight college students listed the factors they consider or would consider when making the following commitments: choosing courses, choosing a major, choosing a career, choosing a friend, choosing a romantic partner, and choosing a lifelong partner. In addition, subjects provided their own definition ofcommitment in an unstructured essay. Subjects listed more factors, more distinct types of factors, and more original factors for interpersonal commitments than for academic/vocational commitments. There were few gender differences found in these measures, contradicting the idea that men and women think differently about different commitments. In addition, few gender or class year differences were found in the themes present in the essay definingcommitment. Conceptions of commitment, as described in essays, predicted thinking about specific commitments only slightly.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Applebaum, M. I., and McCall, R. B. (1983). Design and analysis in developmental psychology. In Kessen, W. (ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology (4th Ed.),Vol. 1:History, Theory and Methods. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, J. (1985).Rationality and Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  3. Clinchy, B., and Zimmerman, C. (1982). Epistemology and agency in the development of undergraduate women. In Perun, P. (ed.),The Undergraduate Woman: Issues in Educational Equity. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Clinchy, B., Lief, J., and Young, P. (1977). Epistemological and moral development in girls from a traditional and a progressive high school.J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Fischoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 1: 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice.Harv. Educ. Rev. 47: 481–517.Google Scholar
  8. Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Havighurst, R. J. (1972).Developmental Tasks and Education. McKay, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Leslie, L. A. (1986). The impact of adolescent females' assessments of parenthood and employment on plans for the future.J. Youth Adoles. 15: 29–49.Google Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction.Psychol. Rev. 80: 237–251.Google Scholar
  12. Kitchener, K. S., and King, P. M. (1980). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education.J. Appl. Develop. Psychol. 2: 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A. (1983).Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  14. Knefelkamp, L. L., and Slepitza, R. (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In Parker, C. A. (ed.),Encouraging Development in College Students. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  15. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3: 551–558.Google Scholar
  16. Marcia, J. E. (1983). Some directions for the investigation of ego development in early adolescence.J. Early Adoles 3: 215–223.Google Scholar
  17. Nisbett, R. E., and Ross, L. (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., and Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 27: 211–219.Google Scholar
  19. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  20. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In Chickering, A. (ed.),The Modern American College. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Pitz, G. F., and Sachs, N. J. (1984). Judgment and decision: Theory and application.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 35: 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pollard, P. (1982). Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability.Cognition 12: 65–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowe, I., and Marcia, J. E. (1980). Ego identity status, formal operations, and moral development.J. Youth Adoles. 9: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schiedel, D. G., and Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role orientation, and gender.Develop. Psychol. 21: 149–160.Google Scholar
  25. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Directions manual and scoring guide.Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL.Google Scholar
  26. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science 211: 453–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallach, M., and Kogan, N. (1965).Modes of Thinking in Young Children. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Develop. 55: 677–692.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen M. Galotti
    • 1
  • Steven F. Kozberg
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton CollegeNorthfield

Personalised recommendations