, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 1287–1289 | Cite as

Foraging behaviour patterns of herring gulls elicited by electrical forebrain stimulation

  • Juan D. Delius
Specialia Physiologica


Behaviour Pattern Larus Larus Argentatus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Zwei artspezitische Verhaltensabläufe, die Silbermöwen (Larus argentatus) bei der Futtersuche und Futteraufnahme zeigen, wurden durch elektrische Reizung begrenzter Bezirke des rostralen Vorderhirns experimentell hervorgerufen. Diese Befunde stützen vergleichend-anatomische Schlussfolgerungen über die funktionelle Rolle des rostralen Vorderhirns bei Vögeln.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. Goethe,Die Silbermöwe (Ziemsen, Wittenberg 1956).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Tinbergen,Die Welt der Silbermöwe (Musterschmidt, Göttingen 1958).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. A. Buckley, Z. Tierpsychol.23, 395 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    J. D. Delius, J. small Anim. Pract.7, 605 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    J. D. Delius, Biol. Med. Engng.4, 393 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    J. D. Delius, Nature, Lond.214, 1259 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    J. D. Delius, Expl. Brain Res.12, 64 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    J. Ten Cate, Ergebn. Biol.13, 93 (1936).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    B. Akerman, E. Fabricius, B. Larsson andL. Steen, Acta physiol. scand.56, 286 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    R. Thauer andG. Peters, Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol.240, 503 (1938).Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    In mammals the involvement of the forebrain in feeding behaviour appears to be less pronounced, while the key role of the diencephalon of course is well documented (P. M. Milner,Physiological Psychology (Holt, Rinhart and Winston, London 1970)). Oral behaviour can however be obtained upon forebrain stimulation, e.g. swallowing from the frontal cortex (A. Car, J. Physiol., Paris62, 361 (1970)).Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    A. Wallenberg, Neurol. Zentbl.22, 98 (1903).Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    C. U. A. Kappers, G. C. Huber andE. C. Crosby,The Comparative Anatomy of the Nervous System of Vertebrates (Hafner, New York 1960).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    It is difficult, at best, to equate any of the avian forebrain structures mentioned with the more familiar mammalian ones. The quinto-frontal tract in particular seems to be an avian peculiarity (W. J. H. Nauta andH. J. Karten, inThe Neurosciences, Second Study Program, (Ed.O. F. Schmitt; Rockefeller University Press, New York 1970).Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    T. Kondo, J. Okayama med. Soc.45, 133 (1933).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    H. P. Zeigler, H. L. Green andH. K. Karten, Psychon. Sci.15, 156 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    S. E. Feldman, S. Larsson, M. K. Dimick andS. Lepovsky, Am. J. Physiol.191, 259 (1957).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    P. Wright, Psychon. Sci.13, 133 (1968).Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    T. Kondo, J. Okayama med. Soc.45, 124 (1933).Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    Another efferent pathway which may need to be considered here is the tractus fronto-quintalis et bulbaris (A. Wallenberg, Arch. Psychiat. NervKrankh.94, 246 (1931)).Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    G. L. Hunt andW. J. Smith, Ibis106, 461 (1964).Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    R. E. Phillips, J. comp. Neurol.122, 139 (1964).Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    P. T. S. Putkonen, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn.A130, 1 (1967).Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    B. Akerman, B. Andersson, E. Fabricius andL. Svensson, Acta physiol. scand.50, 328 (1960).Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    Hyperphagia has been induced in birds by lesions in the preoptic area (W. J. Kuenzel andC. W. Helms, Condor72, 66 (1970)).Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    D. Harwood andD. Vowles, J. comp. physiol. Psychol.62, 388 (1966).Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    That a complex network is responsible for the control of feeding in birds is also suggested by system analytic studies (D. J. McFarland, J. psychosom. Res.14, 229 (1970)).Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    W. Stingelin, Verh. naturf. Ges. Basel73, 300 (1962).Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    One is tempted to predict, disregarding note 4, that upon stimulating the corresponding brain area in gallinaceous birds one would obtain the well known ground scratching they use for finding food, but this is precisely a feeding behaviour that forebrainless domestic chicks apparently retain (E. G. Martin andW. H. Rich, Am. J. Physiol.46, 396 (1918).Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    J. D. Delius andK. Bennetto, Brain Res., in press (1971).Google Scholar
  31. 36.
    A. M. Revzin, Brain Res.15, 246 (1969).Google Scholar
  32. 37.
    N. J. Adamo, J. comp. Neurol.131, 337 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan D. Delius
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DurhamDurhamEngland

Personalised recommendations