Advertisement

Binocular micromovement recording of human eyes: — methods

  • F. Simon
  • E. Schulz
  • B. Rassow
  • W. Haase
Article

Abstract

An apparatus is described for binocular recording of micromovements of human eyes, with the contact lens mirror technique used frequently. Horizontal and vertical micromovements of both eyes are recorded simultaneously by means of instruments measuring light-spot positions. Spatial resolution of the measuring instrument is 12 s of arc, while the time resolution is 0.5 ms for this apparatus. The fixation mark (Snellen character) is at a distance of 5 m without any restrictions to the view. The micromovement data are registered by a microcomputer. A second computer enables precise calculation of the results which are given as multicoloured graphs (X/Y-, X/t-graph, velocity/t-graph, frequency analysis, phase correlation of both eyes). In this way the requirements are met for the clinical application of this measuring instrument on patients.

Keywords

Public Health Clinical Application Time Resolution Frequency Analysis Contact Lens 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler FH, Fliegelmann M (1934) Influence of fixation on the visual acuity. Arch Ophtal 12: 475–483Google Scholar
  2. Anderson R (1954) Latent nystagmus and alternating hyperphoria. Br J Ophthalmol 38: 217–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouis D, Bach M, Fischer B (1983) An accurate and linear infrared oculometer. J Neurosci Methods 9: 9–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciuffreda KJ, Kenyon RV, Stark L (1979) Abnormal saccadic substitution during small amplitude pursuit tracking in amblyopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 506–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciuffreda KJ, Kenyon RV, Stark L (1979) Different rates of functional recovery of eye movements during orthoptic treatment in an adult amblyope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 214–219Google Scholar
  6. Ciuffreda KJ, Kenyon RV, Stark L (1980) Increased drift in amblyopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 64: 1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collewijn H, van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements (research note). Vision Res 15: 447–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooley JW, Tukey JW (1965) An algorithm for machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math Computation (April 1965), 19: 297–301Google Scholar
  9. Cornsweet TN (1956) Determination of the stimuli for involuntary drifts and saccadic eye movements. J Opt Soc Am 46: 987–993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cüppers C (1971) Problem der operativen therapie des okulären nystagmus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 159: 145–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ditchburn RW (1955) Eye movements in relation to retinal action. Opt Acta 1: 171–6Google Scholar
  12. Ditchburn RW (1973) Eye-movements and visual perception. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditchburn RW (1980) The function of small saccades. Vision Res 20: 271–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doden W (1960) Latenter Nystagmus bei Strabismus concomitans alternans. Ber 63. Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophtalmol Ges, 486–490Google Scholar
  15. Fender DH (1956) Thesis, University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
  16. Findlay JM (1974) Direction perception and human fixation eye movements. Vision Res Vol 14: 703–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddad GM, Steinman RM (1973) The smallest voluntary saccade: implications for fixation. Vision Res 13: 1075–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris LW, Cyander M (1981) The eye movement of the dark-reared cat. Exp Brain Res 44: 41–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmann K-P (1978) Optokinetic nystagmus and single-cell responses in the nucleus tractus opticus after early monocular deprivation in the cat. Nato Advanced Study Inst. “Developmental Neurobiology of Vision”Google Scholar
  20. Ishikawa S, Terakado R (1973) Maximum velocity of saccadic eye movements in normal and strabismic subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 17: 11–21Google Scholar
  21. Kowler E, Steinman RM (1980) Small saccades serve no useful purpose: reply to a letter by R.W. Ditchburn. Vision Res 20: 273–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lang J (1967) Der kongenitale oder frühkindliche strabismus. Ophthalmologica 154: 201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mackensen G (1957) Das fixationsverhalten amblyopischer augen: elektro-oculographische untersuchungen. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 159: 200–211Google Scholar
  24. Matin L (1964) Measurements of eye movements. Some new methodology for 3-dim. recording. J Opt Soc Am 54: 1008–1018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. von Noorden GK, Burian HM (1958) An electro-ophthalmographic study of the behaviour of the fixation of amblyopic eyes in light and dark adapted states. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 46: 58–72Google Scholar
  26. von Noorden GK, Mackensen G (1963) Pursuit movements in amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 53: 477Google Scholar
  27. Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-10: 137–145Google Scholar
  28. Schulz E, Simon F (1984) Contact lens fitting for binocular micromovement recording. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Sorsby A (1931) Latent nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol 15: 1–18Google Scholar
  30. Steele CM, Crane HD (1978) Accurate three dimensional eye-tracker. Appl Opt 17: 691–705Google Scholar
  31. Westheimer G (1979) The spatial sense of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 893–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Winterson H, Collewijn H (1976) Microsaccades during finely guided visuomotor tasks. Vision Res 16: 1387–1390PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Simon
    • 1
  • E. Schulz
    • 1
  • B. Rassow
    • 1
  • W. Haase
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitäts-Augenklinik EppendorfHamburg 20Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations