, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 435–444 | Cite as

Problems of citation analysis

  • M. H. MacRoberts
  • Barbara R. MacRoberts


Citation Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. Wade, Citation analysis: A new tool for science administratorsScience, 188 (1975) 429–432.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. B. Bavelas, The social psychology of citations,Canadian Psychological Review, 19 (1978) 158–163.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Taubes, Measure for measure in science,Science, 260 (1993) 884–886.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151–172.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Another test of the normative theory of citing,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38 (1987) 305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Edge, Quantitative measures of communciation in science. A critical review,History of Science, 17 (1979) 102–134.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. M. Collins, The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 165–186.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. M. Baird, C. Oppenheim, Do citations matter?,Journal of Information Science, 20 (1994) 2–15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. A. Brooks, Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (1985) 223–229.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. A. Brooks, Evidence of complex citer motivation,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1986) 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Liu, Progress in documentation — The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies,Journal of Documentation, 49 (1993) 370–408.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Author motivation for not citing influences: a methodological note,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39 (1988) 432–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis: a critical review,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Sancho, Misjudgements and shortcomings in the measurement of scientific activities in less developed countries,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. C. Peritz, On the objectives of citation analysis: problems of theory and method,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Bonzi, W. H. Snyder, Motivations for citations: a comparison of self citation and citation to others,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. A. Tainer, Science, citation, and funding,Science, 251 (1991) 1408.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. P. Hamilton, Research papers: who's uncited now?Science, 251 (1991) 25.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Citation analysis and the science policy arena,Trends in Biochemical Science, 14 (1989) 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. K. Merton,The Sociology of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Ben-David, T. A. Sullivan, Sociology of science,Annual Review of Sociology, 1 (1975) 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. R. Cole, S. Cole, The Ortega hypothesis,Science, 178 (1972) 368–75.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Cole,Making Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Barnes,Thomas Kuhn and Social Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. M. Collins, The sociology of scientific knowledge: studies of contemporary science,Annual Review of Sociology, 9 (1983) 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Shapin, Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge,Annual Review of Sociology, 21 (1995) 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. I. Mitroff,The Subjective Side of Science, Elsevier New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. J. Mahoney,Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative, Ballinger, Cambridge, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Mulkay,Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1991.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. D. Knorr-Cetina, M. Mulkay,Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Sage, London, 1983.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. M. Collins,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice Sage, London, 1986.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    B. Barnes, S. Shapin,Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, Sage, London, 1979.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    H. M. Collins, T. Pinch,The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science, Cambridge University Press, London, 1994.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Brannigan,The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Press, Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Latour,Science in Action, Havard University Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Woolgar,Science: The Very Idea, Tavistock Publications, London, 1988.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. D. Knorr-Cetina,The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    G. N. Gilbert, M. Mulkay,Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientist's Discourse. Cambridge University Press, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. N. Gilbert,Referencing as persuasion,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 113–122.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    K. J. Carpenter, quoted byS. M. Horrocks, Hard truths to swallow,Nature, 372 (1994) 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    B. Latour, S. Woolgar,Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey, 1986.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. Medawar, Is the scientific paper a fraud?The Listener, 70 (12 Sept. 1963) 377–78.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. H. MacRoberts, B. R. MacRoberts, Testing the Ortega hypothesis: facts and artifacts,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Medawar,The Art of the Soluble, Harmondsworth, London, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. MacRoberts
    • 1
  • Barbara R. MacRoberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Bog ResearchShreveport(USA)

Personalised recommendations