Prolonged atrial activity due to delayed conduction in the atrium of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
- 21 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Summary
We investigated the relationship between the duration of electrical atrial activity and intra-atrial conduction time to determine whether the prolonged atrial activity was due to delayed conduction in the human atrium. The study included 15 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and 15 control patients. The duration of atrial electrical activity was measured by selecting a minimum electrographic amplitude of 50µV. In patients with PAF, the duration of atrial activity was prolonged in proportion to the delay of interatrial conduction time from the high right atrium to the coronary sinus as the coupling interval of premature extrastimuli was decreased. Both the fragmented atrial activity zone and the interatrial conduction delay zone were wider in patients with PAF than in control patients. It is concluded that assessment of the duration of atrial activity with a minimum amplitude of 50µV is useful in evaluating human atrial vulnerability since it reflects the atrial conduction delay in patients with PAF.
Key words
Atrial vulnerability Atrial electrical activity Interatrial conduction time Intra-atrial conduction delay Paroxysmal atrial fibrillationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Ohe T, Matsuhisa M, Kamakura S, Yamada J, Sato I, Nakajima K, Shimomura K (1983) Relation between the widening of the fragmented atrial activity zone and atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 53:1219–1222Google Scholar
- 2.Buxton AE, Waxman HL, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME (1984) Atrial conduction: Effects of extrastimuli with and without atrial dysrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 54:755–761Google Scholar
- 3.Fujiki A, Yoshida S, Sasayama S (1989) Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with and without primary atrial vulnerability, Clinical and electrophysiological differences. J Electrocardiol 22:153–158Google Scholar
- 4.Shimizu A, Fukatani M, Tanigawa M, Mori M, Hashiba K (1989) Intra-atrial conduction delay and fragmented atrial activity in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Jpn Circ J 53:1023–1030Google Scholar
- 5.Hashiba K, Tanigawa M, Fukatani M, Shimizu A, Konoe A, Kadena M, Mori M (1989) Electrophysiologic properties of atrial muscle in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 64:20J-23JGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cosio FG, Palacios J, Vidal JM, Cocina EG, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Tamargo L (1983) Electrophysiologic studies in atrial fibrillation. Slow conduction of premature impulses: A possible manifestation of the background for reentry. Am J Cardiol 51:122–130Google Scholar
- 7.Josephson ME, Wit AL (1984) Fractionated electrical activity and continuous electrical activity: Fact or artifact? Circulation 70:529–532Google Scholar
- 8.Cosio FG, Arribas F, Palacios J, Tascon J, Lopez-Gil M (1986) Fragmented electrograms and continuous electrical activity in atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 57:1309–1314Google Scholar
- 9.Disertori M, Inama G, Vergara G, Guarnerio M, Favero AD, Furlanello F (1983) Evidence of a reentry circuit in the common type of atrial flutter in man. Circulation 67:434–440Google Scholar
- 10.Cosio FG, Arribas F, Barbero JM, Kallmeyer C, Goicolea A (1988) Validation of double-spike electrograms as markers of conduction delay or block in atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 61:775–780Google Scholar
- 11.Olshansky B, Okumura K, Hess PG, Waldo AL (1990) Demonstration of an area of slow conduction in human atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 16:1639–1648Google Scholar
- 12.Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Fradella GA (1982) Atrial refractoriness and spontaneous or induced atrial fibrillation. Acta Cardiologica 37:333–344Google Scholar
- 13.Attuel P, Childers R, Cauchemez B, Poveda J, Mugica J, Coumel P (1982) Failure in the rate adaptation of the atrial refractory period: Its relationship to vulnerability. Int J Cardiol:179–197Google Scholar