Multi-laboratory comparison of eight commercially availableHelicobacter pylori serology kits
- 70 Downloads
The performance of eight commercially available EIA kits in detecting antibody toHelicobacter pylori was evaluated by a panel of 17 laboratories using serum from 59 patients selected from endoscopy clinics in Belgium, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Each laboratory received a randomly numbered set of sera and was ignorant of the culture results of the patients. The performance of the kits was assessed in terms of diagnostic accuracy compared to culture (measured by sensitivity and specificity), the interlaboratory variability in diagnostic accuracy and the number of laboratories that experienced problems in using the kits. Grey zone results, which are routinely used to highlight the uncertain interpretation of results that lie near the cut-off point between positive and negative diagnoses, were accounted for in the analysis. Laboratories experienced practical problems in using some kits, whilst other kits were found to have high inter-laboratory variation or low diagnostic accuracy. There was no single kit that performed better on every criterion than the others. The Orion kit was a good all-round performer, whilst the Roche kit was excellent at detecting positive results, although it had a slightly raised false-positive rate.
KeywordsPositive Result Diagnostic Accuracy Practical Problem Culture Result Grey Zone
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.von Wulffen H: An assessment of serological tests for detection ofHelicobacter pylori. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 577–582.Google Scholar
- 11.Blecker U, Lanciers S, Hauser B, Vandenplas Y: Diagnosis ofHelicobacter pylori infection in adults and children by using the MalakitHelicobacter pylori, a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 3: 1770–1773.Google Scholar
- 12.Granberg C, Mansikka A, Lehtonen O-P, Kujari H, Gronfors R, Nurmi H, Raiha I, Stahlberg M-R, Leino R: Diagnosis ofHelicobacter pylori infection by using Pyloriset EIA-G and EIA-A for detection of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and A (IgA) antibodies. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1450–1453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kubonova K, Trupl J: IgG antibodies toGastrospirillum hominis andHelicobacter pylori. Ceskoslovenska Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Immunologie 1993, 42: 22–24.Google Scholar
- 23.Feldman R, Evans SJW, Deeks J, Rathbone B, and theHelicobacter pylori Serology Study Group: Standards for serologic study of infection withHelicobacter pylori. In: Gasbarrini G, Pretolani S (ed): Basic and clinical aspects ofH. pylori infection. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, p. 145–153.Google Scholar
- 24.Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1987, p. 371.Google Scholar