Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 147–158 | Cite as

The effect of head position on scapular orientation and muscle activity during shoulder elevation

  • Paula M. Ludewig
  • Thomas M. Cook
Article

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to compare the effects of flexed head positions on scapular orientation and muscle activity during humeral elevation, and to determine any association of kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) responses. Twenty-five subjects, 19–37 years old and without any recent history of shoulder or neck symptoms, were evaluated. Three-dimensional scapular coordinate data and surface EMG signals from the trapezius (upper and lower), levator scapulae, and serratus anterior were collected at static positions (0°, 90°, and 140°) of humeral elevation in the scapular plane and head positions (0°, 25°, and 50°) of sagittal plane flexion. Scapular upward rotation and tipping were significantly decreased in flexed head positions. The effect of head position on scapular tipping increased as humeral elevation increased. Mean EMG activity of the levator scapula, upper trapezius, and serratus anterior was unchanged across head positions. The lower trapezius demonstrated small but statistically significant increases in mean activity at the 0° and 140° arm positions when the head was flexed to 50°. Significant correlations were found between some EMG and kinematic responses in flexed head positions, however, no consistent patterns were apparent across muscles or positions.

Key words

head position shoulder joint scapula electromyography 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bjelle A, Hagberg M, Michaelson G. Occupational and individual factors in acute shoulderneck disorders among industrial workers.Br J Ind Med 1981; 38: 356–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herberts P, Kadefors R. A study of painful shoulder in welders.Ada Orthop Scand 1976; 47: 381–387.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luck JV, Andersson GBJ. Occupational shoulder disorders. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, eds.The shoulder. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1990, pp. 1088–1108.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hagberg M, Wegman DH. Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulderneck diseases in different occupational groups.Br J Ind Med 1987; 44: 602–610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ViikariJuntura E. Neck and upper limb disorders among slaughterhouse workers: An epidemiologic and clinical study.Scand J Work Environ Health 1983; 9: 283–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westerling D, Jonsson BG. Pain from the neckshoulder region and sick leave.Scand J Soc Med 1980; 8: 131–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herberts P, Kadefors R, Andersson G, Petersen I. Shoulder pain in industry: An epidemiologic study on welders.Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 299–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herberts P, Kadefors R, Hogfors C, Sigholm G. Shoulder pain and heavy manual labor.Clin Orthop 1984; 191: 166–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH. Shoulder impingement syndrome: A critical review.Clin Orthop 1991; 269: 162–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeger LL, Gold RH, Bassett LW, Ellman H. Shoulder impingement syndrome: MR findings in 53 shoulders.Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 343–347.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neer CS. Impingement lesions.Clin Orthop 1983; 173: 70–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder.J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54A: 41–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kibler WB. Role of the scapula in the overhead throwing motion.Contemp Orthop 1991; 22: 525–532.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laumann U. Kinesiology of the shoulder joint. In: Kolbel R, Helbig, Blauth, eds.Shoulder replacement. Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 1987, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ludewig PM, Cook TM, Nawoczenski DA. Threedimensional scapular orientation and muscle activity at selected positions of humeral elevation.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996 (in press).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Der Helm FCT, Pronk GM. Threedimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism.J Biomech Eng 1995; 117: 27–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaffin DB. Localized muscle fatigue—Definition and measurement.J Occup Med 1973; 15: 346–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    HarmsRingdahl K, Eckholm J, Schuldt K, Nemeth G, Arborelius UP. Load moments and myoelectric activity when the cervical spine is held in full flexion and extension.Ergonomics 1986; 29: 1539–1552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuldt K. On neck muscle activity and load reduction in sitting postures. An electromyographic and bioimechanical study with applications in ergonomics and rehabilitation.Scand J Rehab Med 1988; 19 (Suppl): 149.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagberg M. Electromyographic signs of shoulder muscle fatigue in two elevated arm positions.Am J Phys Med 1981; 60: 111–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludewig PM. The Effect of Head Position on Scapular Rotation and Muscle Activity During Shoulder Elevation. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Master's thesis, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soderberg GL, ed. Selected Topics in Surface Electromyography for Use in the Occupational Setting: Expert Perspectives. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Publication No. 91100, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sundelin G, Hagberg M. The effects of different pause types on neck and shoulder EMG activity during VDU work.Ergonomics 1989; 32: 527–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Delagi EF, Iazetti J, Perotta A, Morrison D.Anatomic guide for the electromyographer (2nd Ed). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1980.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kendall HO, Kendall FP.Muscles testing and function. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1949.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schuldt K, HarmsRingdahl K. Activity levels during isometric test contractions of neck and shoulder muscles.Scand J Rehab Med 1988; 20: 117–127.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnston TB. The movements of the shoulderjoint: A plea for the use of the “plane of the scapula” as the plane of reference for movements occurring at the humeroscapular joint.Br J Surg 1937; 25: 252–260.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soderberg GL, Cook TM. Electromyography in biomechanics.Phys Ther 1984; 64: 1813–1820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wei SH, McQuade KJ, Smidt GL. Threedimensional joint range of motion measurements from skeletal coordinate data.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 18: 687–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Craig JJ.Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control (2nd Ed). New York: AddisonWesley Company, 1989, pp. 1967.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brunnstrom S.Clinical kinesiology (2nd Ed). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1966.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weiner DS, Macnab I. Superior migration of the humeral head: A radiological aid in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff.J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52B: 524–527.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula M. Ludewig
    • 2
  • Thomas M. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Preventive Medicine and Physical Therapy Graduate ProgramThe University of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.Physical Therapy Graduate ProgramThe University of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations