Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 159–176 | Cite as

Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse

  • Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
  • Peter Neidig
  • George Thorn
Article

Abstract

Military couples mandated for marital violence treatment (n=199) self-reported pretreatment levels of marital violence. This sample is unique in that data from both partners in severely violent marriages were available. Spouses were interviewed conjointly about past and current marital violence, childhood victimization, type of parental violence witnessed, and subjective impressions of childhood emotional and/or physical abuse. Results suggest that in the majority of these couples both husbands and wives reported engaging in acts of current marital violence (83%). However, significant gender differences were found such that husbands were more likely to use severely violent tactics, less likely to receive a marital violence injury, and less likely to report being afraid during the last incident of marital violence than wives. Surprisingly, wives were more likely than husbands to blame themselves for the first incidence of violence in the marriage. Husbands and wives did not differ in the prevalence of witnessing parental aggression, but wives were more likely than husbands to report being beaten as children and to perceive themselves as abused. For both genders, victimization from mother predicted marital perpetration, whereas victimization from father predicted marital victimization.

Key words

gender spouse abuse marriage family violence childhood abuse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners: Prevalence, outcomes, and policy implications.Am. Psychologist 48: 1077–1087.Google Scholar
  3. Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., and Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury and health correlates for husbands and wives.Arch. Intern. Med. 152: 1178–1184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cascardi, M., Vivian, D., and Meyer, S. (1991, November).Context and attributions for marital violence in discordant couples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cappell, C., and Heiner, R. B. (1990). The intergenerational transmission of family aggression.J. Fam. Viol. 5: 135–152.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. (1977). The intergenerational transmission of family violence: The long-term effects of aggressive behavior.Aggr. Behav. 3: 289–299.Google Scholar
  7. Dutton, D. G., and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.Viol. Vict. 7: 29–39.Google Scholar
  8. Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. (1988). Characteristics of male spouse abusers consistent with personality disorders.Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 39: 763–770.Google Scholar
  9. Herrenkohl, E., Herrenkohl, R., and Toedter, L. (1983). Perspectives on the intergenerational transmission of abuse. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 305–316.Google Scholar
  10. Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1984). An identification of risk factors. In Bowen, G., Straus, M. A., Sedlak, A. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (eds.),Domestic Violence Surveillance System Feasibility Study. Phase I Report: Identification of Outcome and Risk Factors, Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD, pp. 3-1 to 3-13–66.Google Scholar
  11. Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge.Viol. Vict. 1: 101–124.Google Scholar
  12. Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1990). A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives.J. Fam. Viol 5: 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. Kaufman, J. and Zigler, E. (1993). The intergenerational transmission of abuse is overstated. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.),Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 209–221.Google Scholar
  14. Malone, J., and Tyree, A. (1991, August).Cycle of violence explanations of marital aggression and victimization, Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  15. Murphy, C., and O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 579–582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Neidig, P. (1990).A Modification of the Conflict Tactic Scale, Unpublished instrument, State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  17. O'Leary, K. D. (1993). Through a psychological lens: Personality traits, personality disorders, and levels of violence. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.),Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
  18. Pagelow, M. D. (1984).Family Violence, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defense?Viol. Vict. 1: 47–60.Google Scholar
  20. Saunders, D. G. (1989, November).Who hits first and who hits most?Evidence for the greater victimization of women in intimate relationships, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  21. Sedlak, A. J. (1988). Prevention of wife abuse. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 319–358.Google Scholar
  22. Sonkin, D. J., Martin, D., and Walker, L. E. A. (1985).The Male Batterer: A Treatment Approach, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Stets, J., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.),Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations in 8,145 American Families, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A. (1983). Ordinary violence, child abuse, and wife-beating: What do they have in common? In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 213–234.Google Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind closed doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor/Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Sugarman, D. B., and Frankel, S. L. (1993, August).A meta-analytic study of wife assault and patriarchal beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  28. Vivian, D., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987, July).Communication patterns in physically aggressive engaged partners. Paper presented at the Third National Family Aggression Research Conference, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  29. Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender sensitive comparison.Viol. Vict., 9: 107–124.Google Scholar
  30. Walker, L. E. A. (August, 1986). Discussion. In Hamberger, L. K. (Chair),The male batterer: Characteristics of a heterogenous population. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, L. E. A. (1993). The battered woman syndrome is a psychological consequence of abuse. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.),Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar
  32. Widom, C. (1989). The cycle of violence.Science 244: 160–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yllo, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 28–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
    • 1
  • Peter Neidig
    • 2
  • George Thorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincoln
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentState University of New YorkStony Brook

Personalised recommendations