Comment on “smooth and discontinuous signature change in general relativity”
- 45 Downloads
Kossowski and Kriele derived boundary conditions on the metric at a surface of signature change. We point out that their derivation is based not only on certain smoothness assumptions but also on a postulated form of the Einstein field equations. Since there is no canonical form of the field equations at a change of signature, their conclusions are not inescapable. We show here that a weaker formulation is possible, in which less restrictive smoothness assumptions are made, and (a slightly different form of) the Einstein field equations are satisfied. In particular, in this formulation it is possible to have a bounded energy-momentum tensor at a change of signature without satisfying their condition that the extrinsic curvature vanish.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kossowski, M., and Kriele, M. (1993).Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 2363.Google Scholar
- 2.Ellis, G. F. R., Sumeruk, A., Coule, D., and Hellaby, C. (1992).Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 1535; Ellis, G. F. R. (1992).Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 1047.Google Scholar
- 3.Hellaby, C., and Dray, T. (1994).Phys. Rev. D 49, 5096; Dray, T., and Hellaby, C. (1994).J. Math. Phys. 35, 5922.Google Scholar
- 4.Dray, T. (1995). “Einstein's Equations in the Presence of Signature Change,” to appear inJ. Math. Phys. Google Scholar
- 5.Embacher, F. (1995).Phys. Rev. D 51, 6764.Google Scholar
- 6.Dray, T., Hartley, D., Tucker, R. W. and Tuckey, P. (1995). “Tensor Distributions in the Presence of Signature Change.” University of Adelaids Preprint nr. ADP 95-44/M37.Google Scholar
- 7.Hellaby, C., and Dray, T. (1995).Phys. Rev. D 52, 7333.Google Scholar
- 8.Dray, T., Manogue, C. A., and Tucker, R. W. (1993).Phys. Rev. D 48, 2587.Google Scholar
- 9.Hayward, S. A. (1992).Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 1851,2543 (erratum).Google Scholar