Group

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 145–173 | Cite as

Developing the matrix representation grid (MRG): A method for observing group processes. Findings from time-limited group psychotherapy for alcohol-dependent patients

  • Göran Ahlin
  • Christer Sandahl
  • Kristina Herlitz
  • Ingela Brimberg

Abstract

The MRG was published 1988 in order to support developments in group psychotherapy methods as one of the all too few process observation research methods for studying group-as-a-whole. After 9 years of what pilot studies have labeled successful clinical trials, this study aims at validating the MRG against the established SAVI: Structural Analysis of Verbal Interaction (Agazarian & Simon 1989). Videotaped group sessions from short-term groups for alcohol dependent patients conducted along two therapy methods, one behaviorally oriented and the other group analytic, are used as material. The MRG is validated in the study, confirmed to be clinically valuable, and some interesting comparisons between the two treatment modalities are also made.

Key words

group psychotherapy research group process observation method validation study short-term groups for alcohol dependent patients relapse prevention group analytic psychotherapy behavior therapy-oriented groups 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, A. (1973). More about individual and group matrix.Group Analysis, 6(2), 105–110.Google Scholar
  2. Agazarian, Y. M. (1989). Group-as-a-whole system theory and practice. In Special issue: The group-as-a whole. Y. M. Agazarian (guest Ed.),GROUP, the Journal of the Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society,13(3&4).Google Scholar
  3. Agazarian, Y., & Simon, A. (1989). An Analysis of Excerpts from the Chicago Group Script of a Psychotherapy Group by SAVI, a Behavioral Observation System. AGPA, San Francisco, February 1989, (unpubl.).Google Scholar
  4. Ahlin, G. (1988). Reaching for the group matrix?Group Analysis, 21(3), 211–226.Google Scholar
  5. Ahlin, G. (1995). A Zoom-Lens for Processes in Therapy Groups: Matrix Representation Grid (MRG) version 2 (manuscript).Google Scholar
  6. Armelius, B. å. (1982). Group personality and group behavior: An expansion of Bion's model. In M. Pines & L. Rafaelssen (Eds.),The Individual and the Group. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Bales, R. F. & Cohen, S. P. (1979).SYMLOG. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bednar, R. L. & Kaul, T. J. (1978). Experiential group research: Current perspectives. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons; pp. 769–815.Google Scholar
  9. Bion, W. R. (1961).Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  10. Birgersson, E. (1995). Observationer av gruppsykoterapi med MRG (Observation of Group Psychotherapy with the MRG Method). MA thesis,Stockholm University Department of Psychology (abstract).Google Scholar
  11. Bloch, S., & Crouch, E. (1985).Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy. Oxford U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brimberg, I. (1992). Verbal kommunikation i gruppterapi (Verbal Communication in Group Therapy). MA thesis,Stockholm University Department of Psychology, (abstract).Google Scholar
  13. Britz, K., & åkerstedt, B. (1987). Kan man göra det osynliga synligt? Pilot-studie av MRG-Diagram (Can the Invisible Be Made Visible: Pilot Study of MRG-Diagrams).PSST, psychotherapeutic writings from Långbro Hospital (abstract).Google Scholar
  14. Foulkes, S. H. (1964).Therapeutic group analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Foulkes, S. H. (1975).Group-analytic psychotherapy, method and principles. London: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
  16. Hedenius, A. (1988). Kan en grupps omedvetna, respektive förmedvetna, det vill sÄga psykodynamiska «latenta innehåll” beskrivas och visualiseras i diagramform? (Can the Not Conscious, Latent Psychodynamic Contents of a Group Be Described and Visualized in Diagrammatic form?)PSST, psychotherapeutic writings from Långbro Hospital (abstract).Google Scholar
  17. Lambert, M. J. & Hill, C. E. (1994). Assessing psychotherapy outcomes. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, (pp. 72–113).Google Scholar
  18. MacKenzie, K. R. (1983). The clinical application of a group measure. In R. R. Dies & K. R. MacKenzie (Eds.),Advances in group psychotherapy. Integrating research and practice. New York: International Universities Press, (pp. 159–170).Google Scholar
  19. MacKenzie, K. R. (1993).Introduction to time-limited group psycho-therapy. New York: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  20. Orlinsky, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psycho-therapy—Noch Einmal. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Chap. 8, pp. 270–376.Google Scholar
  21. Pines, M. (1975). The contribution of S. H. Foulkes to group analytic psychotherapy. In L. Wolberg & M. Aronson (Eds.),Group therapy 1975. An overview. New York: Stratton.Google Scholar
  22. Pines, M. (1983). The contribution of S. H. Foulkes to group therapy. In M. Pines (Ed.),The evolution of group analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, J. P. (1982). Foulkes' concept of the matrix.Group Analysis, 15(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  24. Sandahl, C., & Rönnberg, S. (1990). Brief group psychotherapy in relapse prevention for alcohol dependent patients.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 40, 453–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandahl, C., Herlitz, K., Ahlin, G., & Rönnberg, S. (1995). Coping Skills or Psychodynamic Brief Group Therapies for Alcohol Dependent Patients: 19 Months Follow-up (submitted).Google Scholar
  26. Sigrell, B. (1966).Group Psychotherapy. PhD dissertation thesis, Stockholm University, (1968). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  27. Simon, A., & Agazarian, Y. (1967).SAVI: Sequential analysis of verbal interaction. Philadelphia: Resesarch for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  28. Stiwne, D. (1989).Border Line Patients in Group Psychotherapy. Studies in Process and Outcome. (PhD dissertation thesis), Department for Applied Psychology, University of Umeå.Google Scholar
  29. Strauss, B., & Burgmeier-Lohse, M. (1994).StationÄre langzeitgruppentherapie. Heidelberg: Roland Asanger Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Thelen, H., & Stockh, D. (1954).Methods for Studying Work and Emotionality in Groups. University of Chicago (unpubl.)Google Scholar
  31. Whitaker, D. S., & Liebermann, M. (1964).Psychotherapy through the group process. New York/London: Aldine/Tavistock.Google Scholar
  32. Whitaker, D. S. (1982). A nuclear conflict and group focal conflict model for integrating individual and group level phenomenae. In M. Pines & L. Rafaelssen (Eds.),The Individual and the group. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  33. Yalom, I. D. (1972).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Göran Ahlin
    • 1
  • Christer Sandahl
    • 2
  • Kristina Herlitz
    • 2
  • Ingela Brimberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Psychotherapeutic PsychiatryLångbro, Stockholm
  2. 2.Section for Clinical Alcohol and Drug Addiction Research, Department of NeuroscienceKarolinska InstituteStockholm
  3. 3.Institute for Psychotherapeutic PsychiatryÄlvsjöSweden

Personalised recommendations