A framework for classifying state involuntary commitment statutes

  • Ruth E. Ross
  • Aileen B. Rothbard
  • Arie P. Schinnar


A typology for classifying state involuntary commitment statutes is described. The basis for classifying the statutes was the severity of the state criteria, the number of possible alternatives available for commitment purposes and, the need for evidence. Based on the classification system, an empirical analysis examined the relationship between the stringency levels of the commitment statutes and rates of admission to state and county hospitals. A log linear regression model was specified using admission rates as the dependent variable and a host of sociodemographic and other supply factors as independent variables. The results of the analysis support the hypothesis that states with stringent involuntary commitment statutes have fewer admissions to state and county hospitals. The typology used in this analysis has numerous public policy applications and can be updated easily as states change their statute criteria.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, M.F. (1972). The criminalization of Mentally Disordered Behavior: Possible side-effect of a new mental health law.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 23(4), 101–105.Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum, P.S. (1982). Civil commitment: Is the pendulum changing direction?Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 33, 703–704.Google Scholar
  3. Bagby, R.M., & Atkinson, L. (1988). The effects of legislative reform on civil commitment admission rates: A critical analysis.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  4. Beis, E. (1983). State involuntary commitment statues.Mental Disability Law Reporter, 7(4).Google Scholar
  5. Belcher, J.R. (1988). Are jails replacing the mental health system for the homeless mentally ill?Community Mental Health Journal, 24(3), 185–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brakel, S.J., Parry, J., & Weiner, B.A. (1985).The mentally disabled and the law (3rd ed.). Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J., & Rayne, J.T. (1989). Some ethical considerations in defensive psychiatry: A case study.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 534–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cocozza, J.J., & Steadman, H.J. (1989). The failure of psychiatric predictions of dangerousness: Clear and convincing evidence.Rutgers Law Review, 29, 1084–1101.Google Scholar
  9. Durham, M.L. (1989). The impact of deinstitutionalization on the current treatment of the mentally ill.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 12, 117–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Durham, M.L., & La Fond, J.Q. (1985). The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment.Yale Law and Policy Review, III, 395–446.Google Scholar
  11. Durham, M.L., & Pierce, G.L. (1986). Legal intervention in civil commitment: The impact of broadened commitment criteria.ANNALS, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 484, 42–55.Google Scholar
  12. Faulkner, L.R., Bloom, J.D., & Kundahl-Stanley, K. (1982). Effects of a new involuntary commitment law: Expectations and reality.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 10, 249–259.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, W.H., & Pierce, G.L. (1985). Civil commitment reform: Context and consequences.Psychiatric Quarterly, 57, 217–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasebe, T., & John MacRae, J. (1987). A ten-year study of civil commitments in Washington state.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 38, 983–987.Google Scholar
  15. Haupt, D.N., & Ehrlich, S.M. (1980). The impact of a new state commitment law on psychiatric patient careers.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 31, 745–751.Google Scholar
  16. Hiday, V.A. (1988). Civil commitment: A review of empirical research.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6(1), 15–43.Google Scholar
  17. Hiday, V.A. (1977). Reformed commitment procedures: An empirical study in the courtroom.Laws and Society, 11, 651–666.Google Scholar
  18. Kiesler, C.A., & Sibulkin, A.E. (1987).Mental Hospitalization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Kirk, A. (1989). The prediction of violent behavior during short-term civil commitment.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 17, 345–353.Google Scholar
  20. Lambrinos, J., & Rubin, J. (1981). The determinants of average daily census in public mental hospitals: A simultaneous model.Medical Care, 19, 895–906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lidz, C.W., Mulvey, E.P., Appelbaum, P.S., & Cleveland, S. (1989). Commitment: The consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 176–181.Google Scholar
  22. Luckey, J.W., & Berman, J.J. (1981). Effects of new commitment laws on the mental health system.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 479–483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Maloy, K.A. (1990).Caring and controlling: The political and socioeconomic factors shaping state civil commitment laws. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
  24. Manderscheid, R. (1989).Number of resident patients, total admissions, net releases, and deaths, state and county mental hospitals: United States, 1950–1988. Materials received by request from the Statistical Research Branch, Division of Applied and Services Research, Center for Mental Health Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. McCafferty, G., & Dooley, J. (1990). Involuntary outpatient commitment: An update.Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 14, 277–287.Google Scholar
  26. McFarland, B., Faulkner, L.R., Bloom, J.D., Hallaux, R.J., & Bray, J.D. (1989). Investigators' and judges' opinions about civil commitment.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 17(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
  27. Mechanic, D., & Aiken, L.H. (1987). Improving the care of patients with chronic mental illness.New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 1634–1638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, R.D. (1985). Involuntary civil commitment: Legal versus clinical paternalism. In S. Rachlin (Ed.),Legal encroachment on psychiatric practice. New Directions for Mental Health Services, No. 25, 13–24.Google Scholar
  29. Monahan, J. (1977). Empirical analysis of civil commitment: Critique and context.Law and Society Review, 11, 619–628.Google Scholar
  30. Monahan, J. (1981).Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. National Center for Health Statistics. (1986).Vital and health statistics, nursing home characteristics: 1986 inventory of long-term care places (Series 14, No. 33). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  32. Pierce, G.L., Durham, M.L., & Fisher, W.H. (1986). The impact of public policy and publicity on admissions to state mental hospitals.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 11, 41–67.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, R., Miller, K.S., Schmidt, W., & Meeter, D. (1987). The effects of statutory change on the civil commitment of the mentally ill.Law and Human Behavior, 11,(2), 73–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Reisner, R., & Slobogin, C. (1990).Law and the Mental Health System (2nd ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  35. Sosowsky, L. (1978). Crime and violence among mental patients reconsidered in view of the new legal relationship between the state and the mentally ill.American Journal of Psychiatry, 135(1), 33–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Steadman, H.J., Monahan, J., Duffee, B., Hartstone, E., & Robbins, P.C. (1984). The impact of state mental hospital deinstitutionalization on united states prison populations, 1968–1978.The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 474–490.Google Scholar
  37. Wanck, B. (1984). Two decades of involuntary hospitalization legislation.American Journal of Psychiatry, 141(1), 33–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Warren, C.A. (1977). Involuntary commitment for mental disorder: The application of California's Lanterman-Petris-Short act.Law and Society Review, 11, 628.Google Scholar
  39. Wexler, D.B. (1983). The structure of civil commitment.Law and Human Behavior, 7(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth E. Ross
    • 1
  • Aileen B. Rothbard
    • 2
  • Arie P. Schinnar
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Community LivingBrooklyn
  2. 2.Center for Mental Health Policy and Services ResearchUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA
  3. 3.Wharton SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations