Serving the seriously mentally ill in the “least restrictive alternative”: Issues from a federal court consent decree

  • William H. Fisher
  • Jeffrey L. Geller
  • Carla L. White
  • Fred Altaffer


The last two decades have witnessed numerous legal actions aimed at securing the rights of the mentally disabled to be served in the least restrictive alternative consistent with their needs. This paper examines the effectiveness of a federal court consent decree in placing seriously mentally ill persons in less restrictive settings. The data indicate that, despite a massive investment in community based services in the catchment area affected by the consent decree, persons with serious mental illness in this area are no less likely to be situated in some type of supervised setting (including hospitals, residential programs, and nursing homes) than are those in non-affected areas. These data question the extent to which the original goal of the consent decree, to create a service system that would result in many persons living independently in the community, was realized. The data also call for a rethinking of the issue of restrictiveness in the design of similar efforts in the future.


Public Health Mental Illness Nursing Home Catchment Area Service System 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bates et al v. Glover, (Maine Sup. Ct., No. 89-88, 1990).Google Scholar
  2. Brewster v. Dukakis, Civil Action 76-4423-F (CD Mass. 1977); 45 CFR 84.4(b)5.Google Scholar
  3. Casswell v. Secretary of Human Services, No. 77-0488-CV-W-8 (W.D.Mo. 1983).Google Scholar
  4. Dixon v. Weinberger, 405 F. Supp, 974(D.D.C. 1975).Google Scholar
  5. Dorwart, R.A., (1988). A ten year followup study of the effects of deinstitutionalization.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 747–749.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, W.H. Geller, J.L., Pearsall, D.T., Simon, L.J., & Wirah-Cauchon, J.L. (1991). A continuum of services for the deinstitutionalized, chronic mentally ill elderly.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 18, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, W.H., Geller, J.L., Alteaffer, F., & Bennett, M.B. (1992). The relationship between community resources and state hospital recidivism.American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 385–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Geller, J.L., (1991). Defining the meaning of “In the community”.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 1197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Geller, J.L., & Fisher, W.H. (1993). Transitional residences in the linear continuum.American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1070–1076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Geller, J.L., Fisher, W.H., Wirth-Cauchon, J.L., & Simon, L.J. (1991a). Second generation deinstitutionalization, I: The impact ofBrewster v. Dukakis on state hospital case mix.American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 982–986.Google Scholar
  11. Geller, J.L., Fisher, W.H., Simon, L.J., & Wirth-Cauchon, J.L. (1991b). Second generation deinstitutionalization, II: The impact ofBrewster v. Dukakis on correlates of community and hospital utilization.American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 988–993.Google Scholar
  12. Geller, J.L., Fisher, W.H., & Kaye, N.S. (1991). Effect of evaluations of competency to stand trial on the state hospital in an era of increased community services.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 42, 818–822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goffman, E. (1961).Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Gruenberg, E. (1967). The social breakdown syndrome—some origins.American Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 1481–1489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gutheil, T., Appelbaum, P.S., & Wexler, D.B. (1983). The inappropriateness of “least restrictive alternative” analysis for involuntary procedures with the institutionalized mentally ill.The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 7, 10–15.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, P.B., & Faust, L.L. (1977). Least restrictive treatment of the mentally ill: A doctrine in search of its senses.San Diego Law Review, 14, 1100–1154.Google Scholar
  17. J.S. v. Gudeman, No. 91-C-717 (E.D.Wisc, 1991).Google Scholar
  18. Keilitz, I., Conn, D., & Giampetro, A. (1985). Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: Translating concepts into practice.St. Louis University Law Journal, 29, 691–746.Google Scholar
  19. Lake v. Cameron, 364 F.2d 657 (D.C. Cir, 1966).Google Scholar
  20. Lehman, A.F. (1983a). The well-being of chronic mental patients: Assessing their quality of life.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 369–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehman, A.F. (1983b). The effects of psychiatric symptoms on quality of life assessments among the chronic mentally ill.Evaluation and Program Planning, 6, 143–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mills, M.J. (1981). The right to treatment: Little law but much impact. In L. Grinspoon (Ed.),The APA annual review. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  23. Northampton Consent Decree, Civil Action 76-4423-F (D-Mass, ordered December 7, 1978).Google Scholar
  24. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman, (451 U.S. 1, 1981).Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, M.J. (1987).Judge Tauro and care of the retarded in Massachusetts (John F. Kennedy School of Government Case 15-87-7390). Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College. (Cited with permission).Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz, S.J., & Costanza, C.E. (1987). Compelling treatment in the community: Distorted doctrines and violated values.Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 20, 1329–1429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 81 S.Ct.247, L.Ed 2d 231 (1960).Google Scholar
  28. Test, M.A., & Stein, L. (1980). Alternatives to mental hospital treatment.Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wing, J. (1962). Institutionalism in mental hospitals.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 38–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Fisher
    • 1
  • Jeffrey L. Geller
    • 1
  • Carla L. White
    • 1
  • Fred Altaffer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester
  2. 2.Massachusetts Department of Mental HealthBoston

Personalised recommendations