Outcome trends for severely mentally ill persons in capitated and case managed mental health programs

  • H. Stephen Leff
  • Marcus Lieberman
  • Virginia Mulkern
  • Barbara Raab

Abstract

This study compared outcomes over time of persons with severe mental illness who were randomly assigned to capitated and fee for service programs. Data were collected by independent raters and case managers. The effects of capitation on linear trends for symptoms, social conflict and functioning were examined using analysis of covariance and regression. Independent variables were capitation versus fee for service funding and baseline scores on the dependent variables. Covariates were sociodemographic and clinical variables. Persons in capitated programs had slightly better outcomes on two measures: social conflict and global functional level. Initially more disturbed persons had slightly better outcomes under capitation than under fee for service funding on symptoms and social conflict, while less disturbed persons had equal or poorer outcomes. Implications of these findings for program planning and future research are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bock, R.D. (1975).Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bryke, A.S., & Rudenbush, S.W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chamberlain, C., & Rapp, C.A. (1991). A decade of case management: A methodological review of outcome research.Community Mental Health Journal, 27, 171–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J., & Cohen P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, R.E., Reed, S., Babigian, H.M., Brown, S.W., & Fray, J. (1994). A mental health capitation program: Patient outcomes.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45, 1090–1096.Google Scholar
  6. Dar, R., Serlin, R.C., & Omer, H. (1994). Misuse of statistical tests in three decades of psychotherapy research.Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 75–82.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, R.H., Wilson, N.Z., & Foster, M.F. (1984). Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: Colorado client assessment record (CCAR).Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 72–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Francis, D., Fletcher, J., & Stuebing, K., Davidson, K.C., & Thompson, N.M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.5, 927–37.Google Scholar
  9. Furman, W.M., & Lund, D.A. (1979). The assessment of patient needs: Description of the level of care survey.Journal of Psychiatric Treatment and Evaluation, 1, 29–37.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, R., Hedeker, D., Waternaux, C., & Davis, J. (1988). Random regression models: A comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 438–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. (1992).Beyond symptom suppression: Improving long term outcomes of schizophrenia. (No. 134). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  12. Hadley, T., Schinnar, A., Rothbard, A., & Kinosian, M. (1989). Capitation financing of public mental health services for the chronically mentally ill.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 16, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurley, R.E., Freund, D.A., & Paul, J.E. (1993).Managed care in Medicaid: Lessons for policy and program design. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirk, R.E. (1968).Experimental design for the behavioral sciences. Belmont CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. Kraemer, H.C. (1982). Kappa coefficient. In S. Katz & N.L. Johnson (Eds.),Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Laird, N.M., & Ware, J.H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data.Biometrics, 38, 963–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamb, R., & Associates (1976).Community survival for long term patients. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Leff, H.S., Mulkern, V.M., & Lieberman, M., & Raab, B. (1994). The effects of capitation on service access, adequacy, and appropriateness.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 21, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leff, H.S., Mulkern, V.M., Lieberman, M., & White, C. (1991).Getting started: The Arizona Pilot Project evaluation executive summary. Cambridge: Human Services Research Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Leff, H.S., Mulkern, V.M., & Sechrest, L. (1988).Arizona Pilot Program evaluation substudy #1: Baseline report. Cambridge: Human Services Research Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Lehman, A. (1987). Capitation payment and mental health care: A review of the opportunities and risks.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 38, 31–3.Google Scholar
  22. Lurie, N., Moscovice, I.S., Finch, M., Christianson, J.B., & Popkin, M.K. (1992). Does capitation affect the health of the chronically mentally ill?Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3300–3304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons, J.S., & Howard, K.I. (1991). Main effects analysis in clinical research: Statistical guidelines for disaggregating treatment groups.Journal of Consulting.and Clinical Psychology, 59, 745–748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mechanic, D., & Aiken, L. (Eds.). (1989). Capitation in mental health: Potentials and cautions, in paying for services: Promises and pitfalls of capitation.New Directions for Mental Health Services, (no. 43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Minkoff, K. (1987). Resistance of mental health professionals to working with the chronic mentally ill. In A. Myerson (Eds.),The clinical, legal and administrative aspects of psychiatric disability. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  26. Mowbray, C.T., & Freddolino, P.P. (1986). Consulting to implement nontraditional community programs for the long-term mentally disabled.Administration in Mental Health, 14, 122–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paul, G. & Lentz, R. (1977).Psychosocial treatment of chronic mental patients. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santiago, J. (1987). Reforming a system of care.Hospital of Community Psychiatry, 38, 270–273.Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger, M. (1989). Striking a balance: capitation, the mentally ill, and public policy. In D. Mechanic, L. Aiken (Eds.),New Directions for Mental Health Services, (no. 43). Paying for Services: Promises and Pitfalls of Capitation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Snedecor, G., & Cochran, W. (1972).Statistical methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. State of Arizona, House of Representatives, thirty seventh Legislature, Second Regular Session. (1986). Arizona House Bill 2511, Chapter 398. (1986).Google Scholar
  33. Strauss, J., Hafez, H., Harding, C.M., & Lieberman, P. (1985). The course of psychiatric disorder, iii: Longitudinal principles.American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 289–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Straw, R. (1982).Meta-analysis of deinstitutionalization in mental health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Evanston: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  35. Ware, J.E., Brook, R.H., & Rogers, E.K., Keeler, E.B., Davies, A.R., Sherbourne, C.D., Goldberg, G.A., Camp, P. & Newhouse, J.P. (1986). Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organization with those of fee for service care.The Lancet, 8488, 1017–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wells, K.B., Manning, W.G., & Valdez, R. (1990). The effects of a prepaid group practice on mental health outcomes.Health Services Research, 25, 615–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Willet, J., Ayoub, C., & Robinson, D. (1991). Using growth modeling to examine systematic differences in growth: An example of change in functioning in families at risk of maladaptive parenting, child abuse, or neglect.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 38–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Stephen Leff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marcus Lieberman
    • 3
  • Virginia Mulkern
    • 1
  • Barbara Raab
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Services Research InstituteCambridge
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry at Cambridge HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolUK
  3. 3.Responsive MethodologyUSA

Personalised recommendations