A contravariant theory of differential prolongation in models of spaces with connection

V. I. Bliznikas, “On the theory of curvature of spaces of supporting elements,” Lit. Mat. Sb.,5, No. 1, 9–24 (1965).Google Scholar

V. I. Bliznikas and Z. Yu. Lupeikis, “Geometry of differential equations,” in: Algebra, Topology, Geometry [in Russian], Vol. 11 (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI Akad. Nauk SSSR), Moscow (1974), pp. 209–259.Google Scholar

V. I. Bliznikas and Z. Yu. Lupeikis, “On the geometry of certain systems of partial differential equations,” in: Proceedings of the Geometry Seminar [in Russian], Vol. 5, VINITI (1974), pp. 135–168.Google Scholar

A. M. Vasil'ev, “Differential algebra. Contravariant analytic methods in differential geometry,” in: Problems in Geometry [in Russian], Vol. 10 (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI Akad. Nauk SSSR), Moscow (1978), pp. 5–24.Google Scholar

A. M. Vinogradov, “Geometry on nonlinear differential equations,” in: Problems in Geometry [in Russian], Vol. 11 (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI Akad. Nauk SSSR), Moscow (1980), pp. 89–134.Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “Geometry of fibered submanifolds,” in: Proceedings of the Geometry Seminar [in Russian], Vol. 5, VINITI (1974), pp. 201–237.Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “Formal differentiation in spaces of geometric objects,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),15, No. 4, 17–40 (1976).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “Generalized linear structures and the geometry of submanifolds. Part I,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),17, No. 4, 31–82 (1977).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “The geometry of systems of differential equations. I. Formalization of of the Frölicher-Nijenhuis theory,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),21, No. 2, 67–80 (1981).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “The geometry of systems of differential equations. II. Contravariant theory of differential prolongation,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys,21, No. 4, 19–34 (1981).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “The geometry of systems of differential equations. III. Intrinsic formalization of differential-geometric structures,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),22, No. 1, 40–54 (1982).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “The geometry of systems of differential equations. IV. The determining Lie-Bäcklund system,” Liet. Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),22, No. 2, 28–43 (1982).Google Scholar

R. V. Vosilyus, “The geometry of systems of differential equations. V. The determining Lie structure,” Liet Mat. Rinkinys (Lit. Mat. Sb.),22, No. 3, 40–54 (1982).Google Scholar

L. E. Evtushik, “Differential connections and infinitesimal transformations of the prolonged pseudogroup,” in: Proceedings of the Geometry Seminar [in Russian], Vol. 2, VINITI (1969), pp. 119–150.Google Scholar

N. Kh. Ibragimov and R. L. Anderson, “Groups of contact Lie-Bäcklund transformations,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,227, No. 3, 539–542 (1976).Google Scholar

B. A. Kupershmidt, “On the geometry of jet manifolds,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,30, No. 5, 211–212 (1975).Google Scholar

G. F. Laptev, “Distributions of tangent elements,” in: Proceedings of the Geometry Seminar [in Russian], Vol. 3, VINITI (1971), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar

V. V. Lychagin, “Local classification of nonlinear partial differential equations of first order,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,30, No. 1, 101–171 (1975).Google Scholar

Yu. I. Manin, “Algebraic aspects of nonlinear differential equations,” in: Contemporary Problems in Mathematics [in Russian] (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI Akad. Nauk SSSR), Vol. 11, Moscow (1978), pp. 5–152.Google Scholar

L. V. Ovsyannikov, Group Analysis of Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York (1983).Google Scholar

N. M. Ostianu, “Step bundles,” in: Proceedings of the Geometry Seminar [in Russian], Vol. 5, VINITI (1974), pp. 259–309.Google Scholar

P. A. Shirokov and A. P. Shirokov, Affine Differential Geometry [in Russian], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1959).Google Scholar

H. Goldschmidt, “Existence theorems for analytic linear partial differential equations,” Ann. Math.,86, No. 2, 246–270 (1967).Google Scholar

H. Goldschmidt, “Integrability criteria for systems of nonlinear partial differential equations,” J. Diff. Geom.,1, No. 3, 269–307 (1967).Google Scholar

V. W. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, “The Lewy counterexample and the local equivalence problem for G-structures,” J. Diff. Geom.,1, No. 2, 127–131 (1967).Google Scholar

A. Kumpera, “Invariants differentiels d'un pseudogroupe de Lie,” J. Diff. Geom.,10, No. 2, 289–345 (1975).Google Scholar

A. Kumpera and D. Spencer, Lie Equations, Vol. I, General Theory, Ann. Math. Studies, No. 73, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J. (1972).Google Scholar

M. Kuranishi, Lectures on Involutive Systems of Partial Differential Equations, Publ. Soc. Mat. Sao Paulo (1967).Google Scholar

H. Lewy, “An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solutions,” Ann. Math.,66, No. 1, 155–158 (1957).Google Scholar

B. Malgrange, “Equations de Lie. I,” J. Diff. Geom.,6, No. 4, 503–522 (1972).Google Scholar

B. Malgrange, “Equations de Lie. II,” J. Diff. Geom.,7, Nos. 1–2, 117–141 (1972).Google Scholar

Ngô Van Quê, “Du prolongement des espaces fibrés et des structures infinitésimales,” Ann. Inst. Fourier,17, No. 1, 157–223 (1967).Google Scholar

J. Vanžura, “Invariants of submanifolds,” Czechosl. Mat. J.,19, No. 3, 452–468 (1969).Google Scholar

J. Vanžura, “Tensor-invariants of submanifolds,” Czechosl. Mat. J.,21, No. 3, 437–448 (1971).Google Scholar