Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 160, Issue 2, pp 295–315 | Cite as

On foundation of the generalized Nambu mechanics

  • Leon Takhtajan
Article

Abstract

We outline basic principles of a canonical formalism for the Nambu mechanics—a generalization of Hamiltonian mechanics proposed by Yoichiro Nambu in 1973. It is based on the notion of a Nambu bracket, which generalizes the Poisson bracket—a “binary” operation on classical observables on the phase space—to the “multiple” operation of higher ordern≧3. Nambu dynamics is described by the phase flow given by Nambu-Hamilton equations of motion—a system of ODE's which involvesn−1 “Hamiltonians.” We introduce the fundamental identity for the Nambu bracket—a generalization of the Jacobi identity—as a consistency condition for the dynamics. We show that Nambu bracket structure defines a hierarchy of infinite families of “subordinated” structures of lower order, including Poisson bracket structure, which satisfy certain matching conditions. The notion of Nambu bracket enables us to define Nambu-Poisson manifolds—phase spaces for the Nambu mechanics, which turn out to be more “rigid” than Poisson manifolds—phase spaces for the Hamiltonian mechanics. We introduce the analog of the action form and the action principle for the Nambu mechanics. In its formulation, dynamics of loops (n−2-dimensional chains for the generaln-ary case) naturally appears. We discuss several approaches to the quantization of Nambu mechanics, based on the deformation theory, path integral formulation and on Nambu-Heisenberg “commutation” relations. In the latter formalism we present an explicit representation of the Nambu-Heisenberg relation in then=3 case. We emphasize the role ternary and higher order algebraic operations and mathematical structures related to them play in passing from Hamilton's to Nambu's dynamical picture.

Keywords

Manifold Phase Space Canonical Formalism Poisson Bracket Deformation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nambu, Y.: Generalized Hamiltonian mechanics, Phys. Rev.D7, 2405–2412 (1973)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayen, F. Flato, M.: Remarks concerning Nambu's generalized mechanics. Phys. Rev.D11, 3049–3053 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mukunda, N., Sudarshan, E.: Relation between Nambu and Hamiltonian mechanics. Phys. Rev.D13, 2846–2850 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirayama, M.: Realization of Nambu mechanics: A particle interacting with SU(2) monopole. Phys. Rev.D16, 530–532 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnol'd, V.: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. GTM60, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1978Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flato, M.: Private communication, 1992Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flato, M., Fronsdal C.: Private communication, 1992Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chakravarty, S., Ablowitz, M., Clarkson, P.: Reductions of the self-dual Yang-Mills fields and classical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1085–1087 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takhtajan, L.: Modular forms as tau-functions for certain integrable reductions of the self-dual Yang-Mills equations. Preprint PAM No.121, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, 1991Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakravarty, S.: Private communication, 1992Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fréchet, M.: Sur une extension de la méthode de Jacobi-Hamilton. Annali di Matematica, ser. III,XI, 187–199 (1905)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Volterra, M.: Sopra una estensione della teoria Jacobi-Hamilton del calcolo delle variazioni. Rend. Accademia dei Lincei,XI, 127–129 (1890)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Connes, A.: Non-commutative differential geometry. Publ. Math. I.E.H.S.62, 257–360 (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bayen, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, C., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation theory and quantization. I–II. Ann. Phys.110, 67–110, 111–151 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lawrence, R.J.: Algebras and triangle relations. Harvard University preprint, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weil, A.: Sur certains groupes d'opérateurs unitaries. Acta. Math.111, 143–211 (1964)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Takhtajan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations