Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 90–92 | Cite as

Evolutionary constraints and the neutral theory

  • Thomas H. Jukes
  • Motoo Kimura
Letter to the Editor

Summary

The neutral theory of molecular evolution postulates that nucleotide substitutions inherently take place in DNA as a result of point mutations followed by random genetic drift. In the absence of selective constraints, the substitution rate reaches the maximum value set by the mutation rate. The rate in globin pseudogenes is about 5 × 10−9 substitutions per site per year in mammals. Rates slower than this indicate the presence of constraints imposed by negative (natural) selection, which rejects and discards deleterious mutations.

Key words

Neutral theory Codon usage Synonymous condons Pseudogenes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kimura M (1968) Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217:624–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jukes TH (1980) Silent nucleotide substitutions and the molecular evolutionary clock. Science 210:973–978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith MM, Andrésson ÓS (1983) DNA sequences of yeast H3 and H4 histone genes from two non-allelic gene sets encode identical H3 and H4 proteins. J Mol Biol 169:663–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kimura M (1983) The neural theory of molecular evolution. In: Nei M, Koehn RJ (eds) Evolution of genes and proteins. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 208–233Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    King JL, Jukes TH (1969) Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164:788–798PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blaisdell BE (1983) Choice of base at silent codon site 3 is not selectively neutral in eucaryotic structural genes: It maintains excess short runs of weak and strong hydrogen bonding bases. J Mol Evol 19:226–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimura M (1981) Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:5773–5777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ames BN, Hartman PE (1963) The histidine operon. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 28:349–356Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J Theoret Biol 8:357–366Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Itano H (1957) The human hemoglobins: their properties and genetic control. Adv Protein Chem 12:216–269Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance ofEscherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for theE. coli translational system. J Mol Biol 151:389–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance ofEscherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol 146:1–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ikemura T (1982) Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective RNAs. J Mol Biol 158:573–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyata T (1982) Evolutionary changes and functional constraints in DNA sequences. In: Kimura M (ed) Molecular evolution, protein polymorphism and the neutral theory. Japan Scientific Societies Press and Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 233–266Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milkman R (1982) Toward a unified selection theory. In: Milkman RD (ed) Perspectives on evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Milkman R (1983) Experimental population genetics. Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, pp 328–334 (Benchmark papers in genetics, vol 13)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas H. Jukes
    • 1
  • Motoo Kimura
    • 2
  1. 1.Space Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of GeneticsMisima, Sizuoka-KenJapan

Personalised recommendations