Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 49–64 | Cite as

Morphological and cultural comparison of microorganisms in surface soil and subsurface sediments at a pristine study site in Oklahoma

  • T. L. Bone
  • D. L. Balkwill
Article

Abstract

Surface-soil and subsurface microfloras at the site of a shallow aquifer in Oklahoma were examined and compared with respect to (1) total and viable cell numbers, (2) colony and cell types that grew on various plating media, (3) cell morphologies seen in flotation films stripped from sample particles, and (4) cellular ultrastructure. Appreciable numbers of microbial cells were present in the subsurface (total counts: 106−107 cellsg−1; viable counts up to 106 cells · g−1), but the subsurface microflora was considerably less populous than that of the surface soil (total counts: 109 cells·g−1; viable counts: 107−108 cells · g−1). The subsurface microflora (especially that of the saturated zone) also appeared to be much less diverse, containing fewer microbial types that would grow on enumeration plates (on nutrient-rich media, 3–4 colony types versus 19–22 for the surface soil) and fewer cell types that could be distinguished by direct microscopy (3–4 types versus 17 for the surface soil). The specific types of microorganisms that were numerically predominant in the aquifer sediments were entirely different from those that were predominant in the surface soil. Moreover, the predominant types varied from one depth to another within the saturated zone. The potential metabolic capability of the subsurface microflora, as indicated by its readiness to grow rapidly on nutrient-rich media, also varied with depth.

Keywords

Surface Soil Cell Morphology Microbial Cell Total Count Shallow Aquifer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1985) In situ characterization of microorganisms indigenous to water-table aquifers. In: Caldwell DE, Brierley JA, Brierley CL (eds) Planetary ecology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp 399–408Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1985) Characterization of subsurface bacteria associated with two shallow aquifers in Oklahoma. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:580–588Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balkwill DL, Rucinsky TE, Casida LE Jr (1977) Release of microorganisms from soil with respect to transmission electron microscopy viewing and plate counts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 43:73–87Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beloin RM, Sinclair JL, Ghiorse WC (1987) Distribution and activity of microorganisms in subsurface sediments of a pristine study site in Oklahoma. Microb Ecol 16:85–97Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bone TL, Balkwill DL (1986) Improved flotation technique for microscopy of in situ soil and sediment microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:462–468Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conn HJ (1918) The microscopic study of bacteria and fungi in soil. NY State Agric Exp Stn Tech Bull 64:3–20Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunlap WJ, McNabb JF (1973) Subsurface biological activity in relation to ground water pollution. EPA-6601/273-013, National Environment Research Center, Office of Research Monitoring, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OregonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehrlich GG, Godsy EM, Goerlitz DF, Hult MF (1983) Microbial ecology of a creosotecontaminated aquifer at St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Dev Ind Microbiol 24:235–245Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghiorse WC, Balkwill DL (1983) Enumeration and morphological characterization of bacteria indigenous to subsurface environments. Dev Ind Microbiol 24:213–244Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghiorse WC, Balkwill DL (1985) Microbiological characterization of subsurface environments. In: Ward CH, Gieger W, McCarty PW (eds) Ground water quality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp 536–556Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirsch P, Rades-Rohkohl E (1983) Microbial diversity in a groundwater aquifer in northern Germany. Dev Ind Microbiol 24:183–200Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poindexter JS (1981) Oligotrophy, fast and famine existence. Adv Microb Ecol 5:63–89Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shively JM (1974) Inclusion bodies of prokaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol 28:167–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trolldenier G (1973) The use of fluorescence microscopy for counting soil microorganisms. Bull Ecol Res Comm-NFR (Statens Naturvctensk Forskningsrad) 17:53–59Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waid JS (1973) A method to study microorganisms on surface films from soil particles with the aid of the transmission electron microscope. Bull Ecol Res Comm-NFR (Statens Naturvetensk Forskningsrad) 17:103–108Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waid JS, Suan TB (1974) Transmission electron microscopy of bacteria in soils during acetate decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 6:63–68Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Webster JJ, Hampton GJ, Wilson JT, Ghiorse WC, Leach FR (1985) Determination of microbial cell numbers in subsurface samples. Ground Water 23:17–25Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    White DC, Smith GA, Gehron MJ, Parker JH, Findlay RH, Martz RF, Fredrickson HL (1983) The groundwater aquifer microbiota: biomass, community structure, and nutritional status. Dev Ind Microbiol 24:201–211Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson JT, McNabb JF, Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1983) Enumeration and characterization of bacteria indigenous to a shallow water-table aquifer. Ground Water 23:17–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson JT, McNabb JF, Wilson BH, Noonan MJ (1983) Biotransformation of selected organic pollutants in ground water. Dev Ind Microbiol 17:225–233Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson JT, Miller GD, Ghiorse WC, Leach FR (1986) Relationship between the ATP content of subsurface material and the rate of biodegradation of alkylbenzenes and chlorobenzene. J Contam Hydrol 1:163–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. L. Bone
    • 1
  • D. L. Balkwill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations