The case for context — Catullus 64

Barthes, R.,Essais Critiques, Paris 1964.Google Scholar

Floratos, C. S.,Über das 64. Gedicht Catulls. Athens, 1957.Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J.,Catullus. A Commentary. Oxford, 1961. (My debt of gratitude to Fordyce, as well as to other recent commentators of Catullus, is obvious throughout this paper, if not always specifically acknowledged at every turn.)Google Scholar

Friedrich, W. P., ed.,Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill, 1959.Google Scholar

Goldmann, L.,Pour une sociologie du roman. Paris, 1964.Google Scholar

Grant, M.,The World of Rome, London, 1960.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. S, ed.,The Nature of Translation. The Hague, 1972.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J., “Problèmes de la structuration du texte”.La Nouvelle Critique. Numéro Spécial, Linguistique et Littérature, 1968.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J.,The Art of Catullus 64. Cambridge, Mass., 1961.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. F.,The Catullan Revolution. London/New York, 1959Google Scholar

Valéry, P.Œuvres, I. Paris, 1957.Google Scholar

Vivas, E.,Creation and Discovery. Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar

Wheeler, A. L.,Catullus and the Tradition of Ancient Poetry. Berkeley, 1934.Google Scholar