Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 289–292 | Cite as

Gallbladder ejection fraction and its relationship to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

  • Thomas A. Ruffolo
  • Stuart Sherman
  • Glen A. Lehman
  • Robert H. Hawes
Originals Articles


Theoretically, relative distal common bile duct obstruction due to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction may be a cause of poor gallbladder evacuation observed on quantitative cholescintigraphy. In this study, the relationship of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction to the gallbladder ejection fraction by quantitative cholescintigraphy was explored. Eighty-one patients with biliary-type pain and otherwise normal evaluations underwent quantitative cholescintigraphy, sphincter of Oddi manometry, and ERCP. Abnormalities of stimulated quantitative cholescintigraphy and/or sphincter of Oddi manometry were present in 70% of this study group. Manometric evidence of sphincter dysfunction was present in patients with similar frequency irrespective of the degree of gallbladder evacuation. In conclusion, abnormalities of quantitative cholescintigraphy and sphincter manometry appear to be independent factors, although frequent findings in this patient population.

Key words

gallbladder ejection fraction quantitative cholescintigraphy sphincter of Oddi dysfunction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fink-Bennett D, DeRidder P, Kolozsi W, et al: Cholecystokinin cholescintigraphic findings in the cystic duct syndrome. J Nucl Med 26:1123–1128, 1985Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choudhry U, Hawes R, Jamidar P, Ruffolo T, Lehman G: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with intact gallbladders—therapeutic response of endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 38:248, 1992 (abstract)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cunningham JT, Hoffman BJ, Epstein RS, Marsh WH: Clinical utility of basal sphincter of Oddi pressure measurements in patients with biliary tract pain. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1247, 1990 (abstract)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fink-Bennett D, DeRidder P, Kolozsi W, Gordon R: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of CCK cholescintigraphy: Follow-up of 99 surgically proven cases. J Nucl Med 26:P80, 1985 (abstract)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brugge WR, Brand DL, Atkins HL, et al: Gallbladder dyskinesia in chronic acalculus cholecystitis. Dig Dis Sci 31:461–467, 1986Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hogan WJ, Geenen JE, Dodd WJ: Dysmotility disturbances of the biliary tract; classification, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Liver Dis 7:302–310, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thune A, Scicchitano J, Roberts-Thomson I, Toouli J: Reproducibility of endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry. Dig Dis Sci 36(10):1401–1405, 1991Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sherman S, Troiano FP, Hawes RH, Lehman GA: Sphincter of Oddi manometry: Decreased risk of clinical pancreatitis with use of a modified aspirating catheter. Gastrointest Endosc 36(5):462–466, 1990Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westlake PJ, Hershfield NB, Kelly JK, et al: Chronic right upper quadrant pain without gallstones: Does HIDA scan predict outcome after cholecystectomy? Am J Gastroenterol 85:986–990, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruffolo TA, Lehman GA: The value of HIDA imaging in acalculus right upper quadrant pain: “Spin the wheel, Vanna!” Am J Gastroenterol 86:375–376, 1991Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yap L, Wycherley AG, Morphett AD, Toouli J: Acalculus biliary pain: Cholecystectomy alleviates symptoms in patients with abnormal cholescintigraphy. Gastroenterology 101:786–793, 1991Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Topper T, Ryerson T, Nora P: Quantitative gallbladder imaging following cholecystokinin. J Nucl Med 21:694–696, 1980Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sherman S, Troiano FP, Hawes RH, O'Connor KW, Lehman GA: Frequency of abnormal sphincter of Oddi manometry compared with the clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 86(5):586–590, 1991Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gregg JA: Function and dysfunction of sphincter of Oddi.In ERCP Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. I Jacobson (ed). New York, Elsevier, 1988Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimon G, Buffet C, Andre L, et al: Biliary pain in postcholecystectomy patients without biliary obstruction: A prospective radionuclide study. Dig Dis Sci 36:317–320, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cicala M, Scopinaro F, Corazziari E, et al: Quantitative cholescintigraphy in the assessment of choledochoduodenal bile flow. Gastroenterology 100:1106–1113, 1991Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruffolo TA, Lehman GA: HIDA imaging in postcholecystectomy syndrome—clinical value or romancing the stone? Am J Gastroenterol 86:1092–1093, 1991Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Ruffolo
    • 1
  • Stuart Sherman
    • 1
  • Glen A. Lehman
    • 1
  • Robert H. Hawes
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University HospitalIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations