Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 231–250

The context of correctness: A comment on rushton

Articles

Abstract

According to Philippe Rushton, the “equalitarian fiction,” a “scientific hoax” that races are genetically equal in cognitive ability, underlies the “politically correct” objections to his research on racial differences. He maintains that there is a taboo against race unequaled by the Inquisition. I show that while Rushton has been publicly harassed, he has had continuous opportunities to present his findings in diverse, widely available, respectable journals, and no general suppression within academic psychology is evident. Similarly, Henry Garrett and his associates in the LAAEE, dedicated to preserving segregation and preventing “race suicide,” disseminated their ideas widely, although Garrett complained of the “equalitarian fiction” in 1961. Examination of the intertwined history ofMankind Quarterly, German Rassenhygiene, far right politics, and the work of Roger Pearson suggests that some cries of “political correctness” must be viewed with great caution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G. E. (1986). The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An essay in institutional history.Osiris, II, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., & Anderson, J. L. (1986).Inside the league. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Barkan, E. (1992).The retreat of scientific racism: changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the world wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bellant, R. (1991).Old Nazis, the new right and the Republican Party. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  5. Billig, M. (1979).Psychology, racism, and fascism. Birmingham: A. F. & R./Searchlight.Google Scholar
  6. Cain, D. P., & Vanderwolf, C. H. (1990). A critique of Rushton on race, brain size, and intelligence.Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 777–784.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell, R. B. (1937).The fight for our national intelligence. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. (1987).Beyondism: Religion from science. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Cernovsky, Z. Z., & Litman, L. C. (1993). Re-analysis of Rushton's crime data.Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 31–36.Google Scholar
  10. Degler, C. (1991).In search of human nature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Flynn, J. (1988). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.Google Scholar
  12. Gabor, T., & Roberts, J. V. (1990). Rushton on race and crime: The evidence remains unconvincing.Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 335–343.Google Scholar
  13. Garrett, H. E. (1929). Jews and others: Some group differences in personality, intelligence and college achievement.The Personnel Journal, 7, 341–348.Google Scholar
  14. Garrett, H. E. (1961a). The equalitarian dogma.Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 4, 480–484.Google Scholar
  15. Garrett, H. E. (1961b). The equalitarian dogma.Mankind Quarterly, 1, 253–257.Google Scholar
  16. Garrett, H. E. (1961c). The scientific racism of Juan Comas.Mankind Quarterly, 2, 100–106.Google Scholar
  17. Garrett, H. E. (1962). Racial differences and witch hunting.Science, 135, 982–983.Google Scholar
  18. Gottfredson, L. (1994). Egalitarian fiction and collective fraud.Society, 31, 53–59.Google Scholar
  19. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994).The bell curve. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Horowitz, I. L. (1995). The Rushton file: Racial comparisons and media passions.Society, 32, 7–17.Google Scholar
  21. Kevles, D. J. (1985).In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  22. Kluger, R. (1976).Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. Kohn, M. (1995).The race gallery: The return of racial-science. London: Johathan Cape.Google Scholar
  24. Kühl, S. (1994).Eugenics, American racism, and German national socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lane, C. (Dec. 1, 1994). The tainted sources of the bell curve.New York Review of Books, 14–19.Google Scholar
  26. Linklater, M. (Nov. 23, 1994). Racism and the barmy Laird of Nigg.The Times of London.Google Scholar
  27. Lipstadt, D. (1993).Denying the Holocaust: The growing assault on truth and memory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lynn, M. (1989). Race differences in sexual behavior: A critique of Rushton and Bogaert's evolutionary hypothesis.Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 1–6.Google Scholar
  29. Lynn, R. (1991). Race differences in intelligence: A global perspective.Mankind Quarterly, 32, 99–121.Google Scholar
  30. MacGregor, J (1995). Race, prejudice, and a Guggenheim Fellow.Mankind Quarterly, 35, 267–285.Google Scholar
  31. Mehler, B. (1983). The new eugenics: Academic racism in the U.S. today.Science for the People, 15, 18–23.Google Scholar
  32. Mehler, B. (1989). Foundations for fascism: The New Eugenics Movement in the United States.Patterns of Prejudice, 23, 17–25.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, A. (Oct. 20, 1994). Professors of hate.Rolling Stone. In R. Jacoby & N. Glauberman (Eds.),The bell curve debate: History, documents, opinions (pp. 162–178. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  34. Mintz, F. P. (1985).The Liberty Lobby and the American right: Race, conspiracy, and culture. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pearson, R. (1965). Editorials: Our new look.Western Destiny, 10(9, 3–5.Google Scholar
  36. Pearson, R. (1966a).Eugenics and race. London: Clair Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pearson, R. (1966b).Blood groups and race (rev. ed.). London: Clair Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, R. (1991).Race, intelligence, and bias in academe. Washington, D.C.: Scott-Townsend.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson, R. (1995a). The concept of heredity in Western thought: Part two, the myth of biological egalitarianism.Mankind Quarterly, 35, 343–371.Google Scholar
  40. Pearson, R. (1995b). The concept of heredity in Western thought: Part three, the revival of interesting genetics.Mankind Quarterly, 36, 73–103.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, M. (1991). Sex differences in human brain size and the general meaning of differences in brain size.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 507–522.Google Scholar
  42. Peters, M. (1993). Still no convincing evidence of a relation between brain size and intelligence in humans.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 751–756.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, M. (1995a). Does brain size matter? A reply to Rushton and Ankney.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 570–576.Google Scholar
  44. Peters, M. (1995b). Race differences in brain size: things are not as clear as they seem to be.American Psychologist, 49, 570–576.Google Scholar
  45. Popplestone, J. A., & MacPherson, M. W. (1994).An illustrated history of American psychology. Madison, WI: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
  46. Proctor, R. (1988).Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Provine, W. (1973). Geneticists and the biology of race crossing,Science, 182, 790–796.Google Scholar
  48. Putnam, C. (1961).Race and reason. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
  49. Roediger, H. L., Capaldi, E. D., Paris, S. G., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1996).Psychology (4th ed.). Minneapolis/St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Rushton, J. P. (1984). Sociobiology: Toward a theory of individual and group differences in personality and social behavior (with commentaries and authors response). In J. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds.),Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–81). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  51. Rushton, J. P. (1987). Evolution, altrusim and genetic similarity theory.Mankind Quarterly, 27, 379–395.Google Scholar
  52. Rushton, J. P. (1988). Race differences in behaviour: A review and evolutionary analysis.Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1009–1024.Google Scholar
  53. Rushton, J. P. (1989a). Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection (with commentaries and author's response.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 503–559.Google Scholar
  54. Rushton, J. P. (1989b). Invited review: The evolution of racial differences: a response to M. Lynn.Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 7–20.Google Scholar
  55. Rushton, J. P. (1991). Do r-K strategies underlie human race differences? A reply to Weizmannet al. Canadian Psychology, 32, 29–42.Google Scholar
  56. Rushton, J. P. (1992). Contributions to the history of psychology: XC. Evolutionary biology and heritable traits (with reference to Oriental-White-Black differences): The 1989 AAAS paper.Psychological Reports, 71, 811–821.Google Scholar
  57. Rushton, J. P. (1994a). Editorial: The equalitarian dogma revisited.Intelligence, 19, 263–280.Google Scholar
  58. Rushton, J. P. (1994b). Sex and race differences in cranial capacity from international labour office dataIntelligence, 19, 281–294.Google Scholar
  59. Rushton, J. P. (1994c). Victim of a scientific hoax.Society, 31, 40–44.Google Scholar
  60. Rushton, J. P. (1995a).Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  61. Rushton, J. P. (1995b). Race and crime: An international dilemma.Society, 32, 37–41.Google Scholar
  62. Rushton, J. P. (1996). Political correctness and the study of racial differences.Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless (in press).Google Scholar
  63. Rushton, J. P., & Osborne, R. T. (1995). Genetic and environmental contributions to cranial capacity in Black and White adolescents.Intelligence, 20, 1–13.Google Scholar
  64. Rushton, J. P., Littlefield, C. H., & Lumsden, C. J. (1986). Gene-culture coevolution of complex social behavior: Human altruism and mate choice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 83, 7340–7343.Google Scholar
  65. Rushton, J. P., Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1984). Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selection.Behavior Genetics, 14, 179–193.Google Scholar
  66. Samelson, F. (1974). On the science and politics of the IQ.Social Research, 41, 467–488.Google Scholar
  67. Samelson, F. (1992). Rescuing the reputation of Sir Cyril Burt.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 221–233.Google Scholar
  68. Samelson, F. (June 1995). Updating the Burt affair. Paper presented at the XXVII Annual Meeting of CHEIRON, the International Society for History of the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Bowdoin, Maine.Google Scholar
  69. Sautman, B. (1995). Theories of East Asian superiority. In R. Jacoby & N. Glauberman (Eds.),The bell curve debate: History, documents, opinions (pp. 201–220). New York: Times BooksGoogle Scholar
  70. Simonds, C. S. (Sept 10, 1971). The strange story of Willis Carto.National Review, 978–989.Google Scholar
  71. Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1988).The IQ controversy, the media, and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  72. Sokal, M. (1987).Psychological testing and American society, 1890–1930. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tucker, W. H. (1994).The science and politics of racial research. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  74. Valentine, P. W. (May 28, 1978). The fascist specter behind the world anti-red league.Washington Post, pp. C1, C2.Google Scholar
  75. Weingart, P. (1988). German eugenics between science and politics.Osiris, 5, 260–282.Google Scholar
  76. Weizmann, F., Weiner, N. I., Wiesenthal, D. L., & Ziegler, M. (1990). Differential K theory and racial hierarchies.Canadian Psychology, 31, 1–13.Google Scholar
  77. Weizmann, F., Weiner, N. I., Wiesenthal, D. L., & Ziegler, M. (1991). Eggs, eggplants, and eggheads: A rejoinder to Rushton.Canadian Psychology, 32, 43–50.Google Scholar
  78. Winston, A. S. (1996). “As his name indicates...”: R. S. Woodworth's letters of reference and employment for Jewish psychologists in the 1930s.Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 32, 30–43.Google Scholar
  79. Zuckerman, M. (1990). Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences.American Psychologist, 45, 1297–1303.Google Scholar
  80. Zuckerman, M., & Brody, N. (1988). Oysters, rabbits, and people. A critique of “Race Differences in Behavior” by J. P. Rushton.Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1025–1033.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations