Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 153–162 | Cite as

Effect of similarity of ego identity status on interpersonal attraction

  • Jeffrey A. Goldman
  • Charles M. Rosenzweig
  • Ann D. Lutter
Article

Abstract

Similarity of ego identity status, assessed by Marcia's four-category classification system, was related to interpersonal attraction. Using male and female college students as subjects, this study found that (1) while all judges preferred targets who had or who are undergoing a crisis to those who have not had a crisis, (2) diffuse judges preferred targets with no commitments to those with commitments, and (3) judges with commitments preferred a foreclosure target more than judges without commitments. Differential evaluations of the targets' intelligence, knowledge of current events, adjustment, and morality were also found. Results are discussed both in terms of previous research positively relating personality similarity to attraction and Erikson's theory of the relationship between ego identity development and intimacy in interpersonal relations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byrne, D. (1971).The Attraction Paradigm, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Byrne, D., and Griffit, W. (1969). Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristics as determinants of attraction.J. Exper. Res. Personal. 3: 179–186.Google Scholar
  3. Deaux, K. (1976).The Behavior of Women and Men, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, Calif.Google Scholar
  4. Erikson, E. H. (1959).Identity and the Life Cycle, Psychological Issues, No. 1, International Universities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Erikson, E. H. (1963).Childhood and Society, 2nd ed., Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Feinberg, R. A., and Lombardo, J. P. (1978). Perceived locus of control and attraction as a function of locus of control orientation.Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4: 244–247.Google Scholar
  8. Griffit, W. B. (1969). Personality similarity and self-concept as determinants of interpersonal attraction.J. Soc. Psychol. 78: 137–146.Google Scholar
  9. Hodges, L. A., and Byrne, D. (1972). Verbal dogmatism as a potentiator of intolerance.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 21: 312–317.Google Scholar
  10. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3: 551–558.Google Scholar
  11. Marcia, J. E. (1979). Ego identity status. Unpublished manuscript,Google Scholar
  12. Pursell, S. A., and Banikiotes, P. G. (1978). Androgyny and initial interpersonal attraction.Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4: 235–239.Google Scholar
  13. Weiner, D. (1970). Failure of personality variables to mediate interpersonal attraction.Psychol. Rep. 26: 784–786.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Goldman
    • 1
  • Charles M. Rosenzweig
    • 1
  • Ann D. Lutter
    • 1
  1. 1.Hartwick CollegeOneonta

Personalised recommendations