Effect of the composting substrate on biodegradation of solid materials under controlled composting conditions
- 118 Downloads
- 22 Citations
Abstract
Biodegradability under composting conditions is assessed by test methods, such as ASTM D 5338-92, based on the measurement of CO2 released by test materials when mixed with mature compost and maintained in a controlled composting environment. However, in real composting, biodegradation occurs in fresh waste. To clarify this point, the biodegradation of paper and of a starch-based biodegradable thermoplastic material, Mater-Bi ZI01U, was followed by measuring the weight loss of samples introduced either into a mature compost or into a synthetic waste. The weight loss in mature compost was higher at the beginning but tended to decrease; in synthetic waste a first lag phase was followed by an exponential phase. Complete degradation of paper was noticed simultaneously in the two substrates (after 25 days). The bulkier Mater-Bi samples were fully degraded after 20 days in fresh waste, but after 45 days in mature compost. Therefore, the test methods using mature compost as a substrate can possibly underestimate the biodegradation rate occurring in fresh waste, i.e., in real composting plants, and have to be considered as conservative test methods. The test procedure described in this paper seems very suitable as a screening method to verify the compostability of plastic materials in a composting environment.
Key words
Biodegradation testing biodegradability compostability composting simulation biodegradable plastics synthetic municipal solid wastePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.ORCA (1994)Guidelines for the Evaluation of Feedstock for Source Separated Biowaste Composting and Biogasification, Organic Reclamation and Composting Association, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
- 2.Anonymous (1993)Warmer Bull. 38, 10.Google Scholar
- 3.Anonymous (1993)Warmer Bull. 39, 11.Google Scholar
- 4.Anonymous (1994)Warmer Bull. 41, 16.Google Scholar
- 5.European Union (1994) Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Packaging and Packaging Waste. Brussels, Dec. 5.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Tillinger, B. De Wilde, and L. De Baere (1992) inProceedings of the American Chemical Society, Division of Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering, Washington DC, Vol. 67, Aug.Google Scholar
- 7.C. Bastioli (1995) in G. Scott and D. Gilead (Eds.),Degradable Polymers: Principles and Applications, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 112–137.Google Scholar
- 8.J. Boleans (1992) Final Report: Aerobic Biodegradation Under Controlled Composting Conditions of Test Substance ZI01U, Organic Waste Systems, Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
- 9.F. Zucconi, M. Forte, A. Monaco, and M. De Bertoldi (1981)BioCycle 22, 27–30.Google Scholar
- 10.C. G. Golueke (1977) in D. G. Wilson (Ed.),Handbook of Solid Waste Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 197–225.Google Scholar
- 11.C. Bastioli, A. Cerutti, I. Guanella, G. C. Romano, and M. Tosin (1995)J. Environ. Polym. Degrad.,3(2), 81–95.Google Scholar
- 12.R. A. Gross, J. Gu. D. Eberiel, and S. P. McCarthy (1995)J.M.S.-Pure Appl. Chem. A32(4), 613–628.Google Scholar