Microbial Ecology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 199–210 | Cite as

Detachment ofPseudomonas fluorescens from biofilms on glass surfaces in response to nutrient stress

  • Pascal J. Delaquis
  • Douglas E. Caldwell
  • John R. Lawrence
  • Alan R. McCurdy


The effects of glucose and nitrogen depletion on the colonization of glass Petri plates byPseudomonas fluorescens were studied in batch culture. Colonization of the surfaces was initiated before colonization of the bulk phase, and biofilm formation was observed. This resulted in an apparent lag in the batch growth curve for the cell suspension. The lag phase was an artifact caused by the partitioning of cells between the bulk and solid phase of the culture and was not due to a reduction in the growth rate of unattached cells. The specific growth rate of the unattached cells (0.331 hour−1) was almost twice that determined for the total population (0.171 hour−1). Consequently the growth rate of biofilm-forming bacteria cannot be determined in batch culture unless the growth of both attached and unattached cells is monitored, and batch growth curves may contain artifacts due to the formation and dispersion of biofilms. The depletion of either glucose or nitrogen led to the active detachment of cells from the biofilm. An increase in the hydrophobicity of unattached cells was noted on depletion of carbon. This increase was the result of emigration of cells from the surface into the bulk phase.


Nitrogen Glucose Growth Rate Cell Suspension Total Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Belas RM, Colwell RR (1982) Scanning electron microscope observations of the swarming phenomenon ofVibrio parahaemolyticus. J Bacteriol 150:956–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown CM, Ellwood DC, Hunter VR (1977) Growth of bacteria at surfaces: Influence of nutrient limitation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caldwell DE, Lawrence JR (1986) Growth kinetics ofPseudomonas fluorescens microcolonies within the hydrodynamic boundary layers of surface microenvironments. Microb Ecol 12:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Characklis WG, Cooksey KE (1983) Biofilms and microbial fouling. Adv Appl Microbiol 29:93–138Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corpe WA (1974) Detachment of marine periphytic bacteria from surfaces. Dev Ind Microbiol 15:281–287Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costerton JW (1985) In: Savage DC, Fletcher M (eds) Bacterial adhesion. Mechanisms and physiological significance. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costerton JW, Geesey GG, Cheng KJ (1978) How bacteria stick. Sci Am 238:86–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawson MP, Humphrey BA, Marshall KC (1981) Adhesion: A tactic in the survival strategy of a marineVibrio during starvation. Current Microbiol 6:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellwood DC, Keevil CW, Marsh PD, Brown CM, Wardell JN (1982) Surface associated growth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 297:517–532Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fraser TW, Gilmour A (1986) Scanning electron microscopy preparation methods: Their influence on the morphology and fibril formation inPseudomonas fragi (ATCC 4973). J Appl Bacteriol 60:527–533Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hogg SD, Manning GE (1987) The hydrophobicity of ‘viridans’ streptococci isolated from the human mouth. J Appl Bacteriol 63:311–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kjelleberg S, Hermansson M (1984) Starvation-induced effects on bacterial surface characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:497–503Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawrence JR, Delaquis PJ, Korber DR, Caldwell DE (1987) Behavior ofPseudomonas fluorescens within the hydrodynamic boundary layers of surface microenvironments. Microb Ecol 14:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marrie TJ, Costerton JW (1985) Scanning electron microscopic study of uropathogen adherence to a plastic surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1018–1024Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall KC (1976) Interfaces in microbial ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marshall KC (1985) In: Savage DC, Fletcher M (eds) Bacterial adhesion. Mechanisms and physiological significance. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall KC (1988) Adhesion and growth of bacteria at surfaces in oligotrophic habitats. Can J Microbiol 34:503–506Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayfield CI, Inniss WE (1977) A rapid, simple method for staining bacterial flagella. Can J Microbiol 23:1311–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meadows PS (1971) The attachment of bacteria to solid surfaces. Arch Mikrobiol 75:374–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salas SD, Geesy GG (1983) Surface attachment of a sediment isolate ofEnterobacter cloacae. Microb Ecol 9:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB (1987) The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adherence. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1893–1897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, Schraa G, Zehnder AJB (1987) Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as a measure to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1898–1901PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Loosdrecht MC, Norde W, Zehnder AJB (1987) Influence of cell surface characteristics on bacterial adhesion to solid supports. Proc 4th Eur Congr on Biotechnology 4:575–580Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu C, Lee AM, Roseman S (1987) The sugar-specific adhesion/de-adhesion apparatus of the marine bacteriumVibrio furnissii is a sensorium that continuously monitors nutrient levels in the environment. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 149:86–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ZoBell CE (1943) The effect of soil surfaces upon bacterial activity. J Bacteriol 46:39–54Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ZoBell CE, Allen EC (1933) Attachment of marine bacteria to submerged slides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 30:1409–1411Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal J. Delaquis
    • 1
  • Douglas E. Caldwell
    • 1
  • John R. Lawrence
    • 1
  • Alan R. McCurdy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Microbiology and Food ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations