Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 203–214 | Cite as

Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea)

  • Claire C. Vos
  • Anton H. P. Stumpel
Article

Abstract

The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.

Keywords

habitat fragmentation isolation amphibians landscape planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oilos 71: 355–366.Google Scholar
  2. Askins, R.A., Philbrick, M.J. and Sugeneo, D.S. 1987. Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities. Biological Conservation 39: 129–152.Google Scholar
  3. Bennet, A.F., Henein, K. and Merriam, G. 1994. Corridor use and the elements of corridor quality; Chipmunks and fencerows in a farmland mosaic. Biological Conservation 68(2): 155–166.Google Scholar
  4. Borgula, A. 1993. Causes for the decline inHyla arborea.In Ecology and conservation of the European tree frog. pp. 71–80. Edited by A.H.S. Stumpel and U. Tester. Proceedings of the 1st International workshop onHyla arborea, 13–14 February 1992, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. Brönmark, C. and Edenhamn, P. 1994. Does the presence of fish affect the distribution of tree frogs (Hyla arborea)? Conservation Biology 8: 841–845.Google Scholar
  6. Clausnitzer, H.J. 1986. Zur Okologie und ErnÄhrung des LaubfroschesHyla a. arborea (L) im Simmerlebensraum. Salamandra 22: 162–172.Google Scholar
  7. Dickman, C.R. 1987. Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 337–351.Google Scholar
  8. Fritz, R.S. 1979. Consequences of insular population structure: distribution and extinction of spruce grouse populations. Oecologia (Berl.) 42: 57–65.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, D. 1987. The demography of chance extinction.In Viable populations for conservation. pp. 11–34. Edited by M.E. Soulé. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Grosse, W.R. 1994. Der Laubfrosch,Hyla arborea. Die Neue Bücherei Bd. 615, Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdenburg.Google Scholar
  11. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 151–162.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, S., Murphy, D.D. and Ehrlich, P.R. 1988. Distribution of the baycheckerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. American Naturalist 132: 360–382.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context — an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 73–88.Google Scholar
  14. Haila, Y., Hanski, I.K. and Raivio, S. 1993. Turnover of breeding birds in small forest fragments: the sampling colonization hypothesis corroborated. Ecology 74: 714–725.Google Scholar
  15. John-Alder, H.B. and Morrin, P. 1990. Effects of larval density on jumping ability and stamina in newly metamorphosed Bufo woodhousii fowleri. Copiea 1990: 856–860.Google Scholar
  16. Jongman, R.H.G., Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Van Tongeren, O.F.R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  17. Laan, R. and Verboom, B. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54:251–262.Google Scholar
  18. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction.In Some mathematical questions in biology. Volume 2, pp. 75–108. American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  19. Loman, J. 1988. Breeding by Rana temporaria; importance of pond size and isolation. Memoranda Society of Fauna Flora Fennica 64: 113–115.Google Scholar
  20. Mabelis, A. 1990. Natuurwaarden in cultuurlandschappen. Landschap 7: 253–268.Google Scholar
  21. Merriam, G. 1988. Landscape dynamics in farmland. Tree 3: 16–20.Google Scholar
  22. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (LNV) 1990. Natuurbeleidsplan, regeringsbeslissing. SDU, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  23. Opdam, P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecology 5: 93–106.Google Scholar
  24. Opdam, P., Van Apeldoorn, R., Schotman, A. and Kalkhoven, J. 1993. Population responses to landscape fragmentation.In Landscape ecology of a stressed environment, pp. 147–171. Edited by C.C. Vos and P. Opdam. Chapmann and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  25. Provinciaal Bestuur van Zeeland 1993. Waterhuishoudingsplan 1993–1997 Directie Milieu en Waterstaat, Provincie Zeeland, Middelburg.Google Scholar
  26. Sinsch, U. 1992. Structure and dynamics of a natterjack toad metapopulation (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90: 489–499.Google Scholar
  27. Sjögren, P. 1988. Metapopulation biology ofRana lessonae camerano on the northern periphery of its range. Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  28. Sjögren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations — The case of the pool frog (Rana-Lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 135–147.Google Scholar
  29. Soulé, M.E, Bolger, D.T., Alberts, A.C., Wright, J., Sorice, M. and Hill, S. 1988. Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology 2: 75–92.Google Scholar
  30. Stumpel, A.H.P. 1987a. Distribution and present numbers of the tree frogHyla arborea in Zealand Flanders, the Netherlands (Amphibia, Hylidae). Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 57: 151–163.Google Scholar
  31. Stumpel, A.H.P. 1987b. Features of the aquatic habitat of the tree frogHyla arborea.In Proceedings of the 4th Herpetological Congress of the Societas Europea Herpetologica. pp. 17–21. Edited by J.J. van Gelder and H. Strijbosch, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  32. Stumpel, A.H.P. 1993. The terrestrial habitat of Hyla arborea.In Ecology and conservation of the European tree frog. pp. 47–54. Edited by A.H.S. Stumpel and U. Tester. Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Hyla arborea, 13–14 February 1992, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  33. Tester, U. 1993. Methods and definitions for tree frog research.In Ecology and conservation of the European tree frog. pp. 9–16. Edited by A.H.P. Stumpel and U. Tester. Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Hyla arborea, 13–14 Feburary 1992, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, C.D. and Harrison, S. 1992. Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 437–446.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. and Warren, M.S. 1992. Distribution of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92: 563–567.Google Scholar
  36. Van Apeldoorn, R.C, Oostenbrink, W.E.I., Van Winden, A. and Van der Zee, F.F. 1992. Effects of habitat fragmentation of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, in an agricultural landscape. Oikos 65: 265–274.Google Scholar
  37. Van Dorp, D. and Opdam, P. 1987. Effects of patch size isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecology 1: 59–73.Google Scholar
  38. Verboom, J., Schotman, A., Opdam, P. and Metz, J.A.J. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61: 149–156.Google Scholar
  39. Verboom, J., Metz, J.A.J. and Meelis, E. 1993. Metapopulation models for impact assessment of fragmentation.In Landscape ecology of a stressed environment. pp. 172–191. Edited by C.C. Vos and P. Opdam. Chapmann and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  40. Vos, C.C. 1993. Versnippering en landinrichting in Zeeuws-Vlaanderen. Deel 1: Boomkikkers. Instituut voor Bos- en Natuuronderzoek, Wageningen. IBN-rapport 050.Google Scholar
  41. Wederkinch, E. 1988. Population size, migration barriers, and other observations of Rana dalmatina populations near Koge, Seeland, Denmark. Memoranda Society Fauna Flora Fennica 64: 101–103.Google Scholar
  42. Wilbur, H.M. 1987. Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68: 1437–1452.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire C. Vos
    • 1
  • Anton H. P. Stumpel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Forestry and Nature ResearchAA WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations