A qualitative analysis of some life-history correlates of longevity inDrosophila melanogaster
- 33 Downloads
Three likely traits were examined for their possible connection with increased life span in strains ofDrosophila melanogaster selected for longevity. First, pairing with males caused a substantial reduction in survival of females from the short-lived control strain but, long-lived females were relatively unaffected. A significant component of the improvement in selected females is, therefore, increased tolerance to the presence of mates. Females only slightly affected male survival in either long- or short-lived populations. Selected strains survive substantially better than controls independently of any effect of mate presence.
The (dry) weight of whole flies is equivalent in long- and short-lived populations. Variation in body size does not appear to contribute significantly to extended longevity here.
A third character, the duration of tethered flight, was found to be from three to five times greater in long-lived populations than controls. This suggests the existence of a common physiological basis of longevity to which multiple components contribute in adaptive improvement.
KeywordsDrosophila longevity mate tolerance body size flight life history
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dingle, H. (1965) The relationship between age and flight activity in the Milkweed Bug (Oncopeltus).J. Exp. Biol. 42, 269–83.Google Scholar
- Dixon, W. J. (1983) BMDP Statistical Software. 1983 Printing with Additions. The University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Luckinbill, L. S., Arking, R., Clare, M. J., Cirocco, W. C. and Buck, S. (1984) Selection for delayed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 38, 996–1003.Google Scholar
- Luckinbill, L. S., Clare, M. J., Krell, W. L., Cirocco, W. C. and Richards, P. A. (1987) Estimating the number of genetic elements that defer senescence inDrosophila.Evolutionary Ecology 1, 37–46.Google Scholar
- Nie, N. H. and Hull, C. H. (1979) SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Release 10. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Partridge, L. and Farquhar, M. (1981) Sexual activity reduces lifespan of male fruitflies.Nature 294, 580–2.Google Scholar
- Partridge, L. and Andrews, R. (1985) The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of maleDrosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing.J. Insect Physiol. 31, 393–5.Google Scholar
- Rose, M. R. (1984) Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 38(5), 1004–10.Google Scholar
- Rose, M. R., Dorey, M. L., Coyle, A. M. and Service, P. M. (1984) The morphology of postponed senescence inDrosophila melanogaster.Can. J. Zool. 62, 1576–80.Google Scholar
- Service, P. M., Hutchinson, E. W., MacKinley, M. D. and Rose, M. R. (1985) Resistance to environmental stress inDrosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence.Physiol. Zool. 58, 380–9.Google Scholar
- Service, P. M. and Rose, M. R. (1985) Genetic co-variation among life-history components: the effects of novel environments.Evolution 39, 943–5.Google Scholar
- Service, P. M. (1987) Physiological mechanisms of increased stress resistance inDrosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence.Physiol. Zool. 60(3), 321–6.Google Scholar