Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 197–200 | Cite as

Facultative parthenogenesis and sex-ratio evolution

  • Curtis M. Lively
Papers

Summary

Phenotypic models of selection are used to determine the effect of facultative parthenogenesis on the production of males in a spatially variable environment when (i) sex determination is under strict genetic control, and (ii) when sex may be environmentally determined. The results show that when sex is under strict genetic control and there is some chance of maturing in isolation, selection favors a female-biased sex ratio. When sex can be environmentally induced by cues which indicate high density, selection favors a mixture of genetic and environmental control, such that half the individuals always become female and the other half become females when isolated and become males when not isolated.

Keywords

Environmental sex determination mixed control nematodes parthenogenesis sex ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bull, J.J. (1983)Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 316 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. (1981) Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15, 57–74.Google Scholar
  3. Charnov, E. L. (1982)The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 355 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Charnov, E. L. and Bull, J. J. (1977) When is sex environmentally determined?Nature 266, 828–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, W. C. (1978) Metabolite mediated density dependent sex determination in a free-living nematode,Diplenteron potohikus.J. Zool., Lond. 184, 245–54.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, R. A. (1930)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 272 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hamilton, W. D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios.Science 156, 477–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lively, C. M. (1986) Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment.Amer. Natur. 128, 561–72.Google Scholar
  9. Lloyd, D. G. and Bawa, K. S. (1984) Modification of gender of seed plants in varying conditions.Evol. Biol. 17, 255–338.Google Scholar
  10. Maynard Smith, J. (1978)The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, London, 222 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Maynard Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 224 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Williams, G. C. (1975)Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 200 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Yeates, G. W. (1978) Studies on laboratory cultures of dune sand nematodes.J. Nat. Hist. 4, 119–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Curtis M. Lively
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurch 1New Zealand

Personalised recommendations