Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 167–173 | Cite as

Nonhomogeneous Poisson model for volcanic eruptions

  • Chih-Hsiang Ho
Articles

Abstract

A simple Poisson process is more specifically known as a homogeneous Poisson process since the rateλ was assumed independent of time t. The homogeneous Poisson model generally gives a good fit to many volcanoes for forecasting volcanic eruptions. If eruptions occur according to a homogeneous Poisson process, the repose times between consecutive eruptions are independent exponential variables with meanθ=1/λ. The exponential distribution is applicable when the eruptions occur “at random” and are not due to aging, etc. It is interesting to note that a general population of volcanoes can be related to a nonhomogeneous Poisson process with intensity factorλ(t). In this paper, specifically, we consider a more general Weibull distribution, WEI (θ, β), for volcanism. A Weibull process is appropriate for three types of volcanoes: increasing-eruption-rate (β>1), decreasing-eruption-rate (β<1), and constant-eruption-rate (β=1). Statistical methods (parameter estimation, hypothesis testing, and prediction intervals) are provided to analyze the following five volcanoes: Also, Etna, Kilauea, St. Helens, and Yake-Dake. We conclude that the generalized model can be considered a goodness-of-fit test for a simple exponential model (a homogeneous Poisson model), and is preferable for practical use for some nonhomogeneous Poisson volcanoes with monotonic eruptive rates.

Key words

prediction interval volcanism Weibull distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bain, L. J., 1978, Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models: Marcel Dekker, New York, 450 p.Google Scholar
  2. Klein, F. W., 1982, Patterns of Historical Eruptions at Hawaii Volcanoes: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 12, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
  3. Mulargia, F., Tinti, S., and Boschi, E., 1985, A Statistical Analysis of Flank Eruptions on Etna Volcano: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 23, p. 263–272.Google Scholar
  4. Parzen, E., 1962, Stochastic Processes: Holden-Day, San Francisco, 324 p.Google Scholar
  5. Simkin, T., Seibert, L., McClelland, L., Bridge, D., Newhall, C., and Latter, J. H., 1981. Volcanoes of the World: Smithsonian Institution and Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 232 p.Google Scholar
  6. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H., 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics (2nd ed): McGraw-Hill, New York, 633 p.Google Scholar
  7. Wickman, F. E., 1966, Repose-Period Patterns of Volcanoes: Ark. Mineral. Geol., v. 4, p. 291–367.Google Scholar
  8. Wickman, F. E., 1976, Markov Models of Repose-Period Patterns of Volcanoes:in D. F. Merriam (Ed.), Random Processes in Geology: Springer, New York, p. 135–161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Hsiang Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Nevada-Las VegasLas Vegas

Personalised recommendations