Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 785–802 | Cite as

Responses of fig wasps to host plant volatile cues

  • Anthony B. Ware
  • Stephen G. Compton
Article

Abstract

Fig wasps (Chalcidoidea; Agaonidae) are intimately associated with the 750 or so species of fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae). Each tree species is usually pollinated by a single species of wasp belonging to the subfamily Agaoninae, while other wasps of the family are parasitoids or seed predators. Previous experiments have shown that the wasps are attracted to the trees by volatiles emanating from the figs. Using fig-bearing trees and arrays of sticky traps baited with figs, we investigated the specificity of wasp attraction and its timing. The pollinators of two closely relatedFicus species were specifically attracted to figs of their host species and only at the time when figs were ready to be pollinated. Some nonpollinating fig wasps appear to respond to the same volatile cues.

Key Words

Hymenoptera Agaonidae evolution fig wasps host finding volatile attractants Ficus Moraceae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, C.C. 1988. Classification and distribution ofFicus.Experientia 45:605–611.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, C.C., andWiebes, J.T. 1992. Figs and Fig Wasps from Africa. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Bergström, G. 1987. On the role of volatile chemical signals in the evolution and speciation of plants and insects: Why do flowers smell and why do they smell differently? pp. 321–327,in V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres, and D. Lachaise (eds.). Insects-Plants. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Bergström, G., Groth, I., Pellmyr, O., Endress, P.K., Thien, L.B., Hubener, A., andFranke, W. 1991. Chemical basis of a highly specific mutualism: Chiral esters attract pollinating beetles in Eurpomatiaceae.Phytochemistry 30:3221–3225.Google Scholar
  5. Borg-Karlson, A.K., Bergström, G., andGroth, I. 1985. Chemical basis for the relationship betweenOphrys orchids and their pollinators 1. Volatile compounds ofOphrys lutea andO. fusca as insect mimetic attractants/excitants.Chem. Scrip. 25:283–294.Google Scholar
  6. Bouček, Z. 1988. Australian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). C.A.B. International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. Bronstein, J.L. 1987. Maintenance of species specificity in a neotropical fig-pollinator wasp mutualism.Oikos 48:39–46.Google Scholar
  8. Bronstein, J.L. 1989. A mutualism at the end of its range.Experientia 45:622–636.Google Scholar
  9. Bronstein, J.L. 1992. Seed predators as mutualists: ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction, pp. 1–44,in E. Bernays (ed). Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. IV. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  10. Bronstein, J.L., Gouyon, P.H., Gliddon, C., Kiellberg, F., andMichaloud, G. 1990. Ecological consequences of flowering asynchrony in monoecious figs: A simulation study.Ecology 71:2145–2156.Google Scholar
  11. Bronstein, J.L., andPatel, A. 1992. Causes and consequences of within-tree phenological patterns in the Florida strangling fig,Ficus aurea (Moraceae).Am. J. Bot. 79:41–48.Google Scholar
  12. Cardé, R.T. 1984. Chemo-orientation in flying insects, pp. 111–124,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  13. Compton, S.G. 1990. A collapse of host specificity in some African fig wasps.S. Afr. J. Sci. 86:39–40.Google Scholar
  14. Compton, S.G. 1993. One way to be a fig.Afr. Entomol. 1:151–158.Google Scholar
  15. Compton, S.G., andvan Noort, S. 1992. Southern African fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea): Resource utilization and host relationships.Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 95:423–435.Google Scholar
  16. Compton, S.G., Holton, K.C., Rashbrook, V.K., van Noort, S., Vincent, S.L., andWare, A.B. 1991. Studies ofCeratosolen galili, a non-pollinating agaonid fig wasp.Biotropica 23:188–194.Google Scholar
  17. Compton, S.G., Rasplus, J.-Y., andWare, A.B. 1994. African fig wasp parasitoid communities.In B.A. Hawkins and W. Sheenan (eds.). Parasitoid Community Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. In press.Google Scholar
  18. Condit, I.J. 1933. Cytological studies in the genusFicus. II. Chromosome number and morphology in thirty-one species.Univ. Calf. Publ. Bot. 17:61–74.Google Scholar
  19. Condit, I.J. 1964. Cytological studies in the genusFicus. III. Chromosome numbers in sixty-two species.Madrono 17:153–155.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, D.R. 1967. A revision of the moths of the subfamily Prodoxinae (Lepidoptera: Incurvaridae). U.S. National Museum Bulletin No. 225. Smithsonian Institute of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  21. Galil, J. 1977. Fig biology,Endeavour 1:52–56.Google Scholar
  22. Galil, J., andEisikowitch, D. 1969. Further studies on the pollination ecology ofFicus sycomorus L. (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae).Tijd. Entomol. 112:1–13.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, D.S. 1967. Figs (Ficus spp.) and fig wasps (Chalcidoidea).J. Nat. Hist. 1:413–434.Google Scholar
  24. Hills, H.G., Williams, N.H., andDobson, C.H. 1972. Floral fragrances as isolating mechanisms in the genusCatasetum (Orchidaceae).Biotropica 4:61–76.Google Scholar
  25. Janzen, D.H. 1979. How to be a fig.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:13–51.Google Scholar
  26. Joseph, K.J. 1958. Recherches sur les ChalcidiensBlastophaga psenes (L.) etPhilotrypesis caricae (L.) du figuierFicus carica (L.)Am. Sci. Nat. 20:197–260.Google Scholar
  27. Kiellberg, F., Doumesche, B., andBronstein, J.L. 1988. Longevity of a fig wasp (Blastophaga psenes).Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C 91:117–122.Google Scholar
  28. Michaloud, G. 1988. Aspects de la reproduction des figuiers monoiques et foret Equatoriale Africaine. Unpublished PhD thesis. Academie de Montpellier Universite des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, J.R., andStrickler, K.L. 1984. Finding and accepting host plants, pp. 127–155,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  30. Ohri, D., andKhoshoo, T.N. 1987. Nuclear DNA contents in the genusFicus (Moroceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 156:1–4.Google Scholar
  31. Owens, E.D., andProkopy, R.J. 1986. Relationship between reflectance spectra of host plant surfaces and visual detection of host fruit byRhagoletis pomonella.Physiol. Entomol. 11:297–307.Google Scholar
  32. Paulus, H.F., andGack, C. 1990. Pollinators as prepollinating isolation factors: Evolution and speciation inOphrys (Orchidaceae).Isr. J. Bot. 39:43–79.Google Scholar
  33. Rausher, M.D. 1978. Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly.Science 200:1071–1073.Google Scholar
  34. Ramirez, B.W. 1970. Host specificity of fig wasps (Agaonidae).Evolution 24:680–691.Google Scholar
  35. Ramirez, B.W. 1974. Coevolution ofFicus and Agaonidae.Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61:770–780.Google Scholar
  36. Stace, C.A. 1975. Hybridisation and the Flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  37. Ulenberg, S. 1985. The phylogeny of the genusApocrypta Coqueral in relation to its hosts,Ceratosolen Mayr (Agaonidae) andFicus L.Verh. K. Akad. Wet. 83:149–176.Google Scholar
  38. van Noort, S. 1992. The systematics and phylogenetics of the Sycoecinae (Agaonidae), Chalcidoidea, Hymenoptera). Unpublished PhD thesis. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  39. van Noort, S., Ware, A.B., andCompton, S.G. 1989. Pollinator specific volatile attractants released from the figs ofFicus burtt-davyi.S Afr. J. Sci. 85:323–324.Google Scholar
  40. Visser, J.H. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31:121–144.Google Scholar
  41. von Frisch, K. 1967 The dance language and orientation of bees. Belnap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  42. Ware, A.B., andCompton, S.G. 1992. Breakdown of pollinator specificity in an African fig tree.Biotropica 24:544–549.Google Scholar
  43. Ware, A.B., andCompton, S.G. 1994. Dispersal of adult female fig wasps: Movements between trees.Entomol. Exp. Appl. In press.Google Scholar
  44. Ware, A.B., Compton, S.G., Kaye, P.T., andvan Noort, S.G. 1993. Fig volatiles: Their role in attracting pollinators and maintaining pollinator specificity.Pl. Syst. Evol. 186:147–156.Google Scholar
  45. Wharton, R.A., Tilson, J.W., andTilson, R.L. 1980. Asynchrony in a wild population ofFicus sycomorus.S. Afr. J. Sci. 76:478–480.Google Scholar
  46. Wiebes, J.T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators.Annu. Rev. Evol. Syst. 10:1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Wiebes, J.T. 1989. Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea) andFicus (Moraceae): Fig wasps and their figs, IV (AfricanCeratosolen).Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. C 62:251–266.Google Scholar
  48. Wiebes, J.T., andCompton, S.G. 1990. Agaonidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) andFicus (Moraceae): Fig wasps and their figs, VI (Africa concluded).Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 93:203–222.Google Scholar
  49. Windsor, D.M., Morrison, D.W., Estribi, M.A., andde Leon, B. 1989. Phenology of fruit and leaf production by “strangler” figs on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Experientia 45:647–653.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony B. Ware
    • 1
  • Stephen G. Compton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and EntomologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations