Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 465–479 | Cite as

Wave-corpuscle duality of light reconsidered

  • C. Cormier-Delanoue
Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The old and yet unanswered question of the precise nature of light, although completely and deliberately neglected nowadays, is reexamined by several new methods, both theoretical and experimental. The wave-corpuscle duality of light then appears somewhat different, and a new hypothesis on the process of electromagnetic interaction may be proposed in an attempt to untangle the dilemma and reach a more realistic description.

Keywords

Unanswered Question Precise Nature Electromagnetic Interaction Realistic Description 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 367 (1905).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. de Broglie,Ann. Phys. (Paris) 3, 22 (1925).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. A. M. Dirac,Proc. R. Soc. London 114, 243 (1927).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. W. Milonni.The Wave-Particle Dualism (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984), p. 27; E. T. Jaynes,Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 37.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. A. M. Dirac,Directions in Physics (Wiley, New York, 1978), p. 10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. O. Barut, in Louis de Broglie,Heisenberg's Uncertainties and the Probabilistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Alwyn van der Merwe, translator (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990), p. XI.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 891 (1905).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Wiley. New York, 1975). p. 522.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. de Broglie,Une nouvelle théorie de la lumière: la mécanique ondulatoire du photon (Hermann, Paris, (1942).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Cormier-Delanoue,Found. Phys. Lett. 5, 355 (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics, 5th edn. (Pergamon, New York, 1975), p. XXIII.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. D 9, 853 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. de Broglie and J. Andrade e Silva,Phys. Rev. 172, 1284 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. L. Pfleegor and L. Mandel,Phys. Rev. Lett. A 24, 766 (1967).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Mandel, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel,Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1111 (1991). X. Y. Zou, T. Grayson, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3667 (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. L. Piqué and J. L. Vialle,Opt. Common 402 (1972).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Aharonov and D. Z. Albert,Phys. Rev. D 24, 359 (1981).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Cormier-Delanoue,Ann. Fond.: L. de Broglie 15, 211 (1990).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Cormier-Delanoue,Found. Phys. 19, 1171 (1989).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Tetrode,Z. Phys. 10, 327 (1922); G. N. Lewis,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12, 22 (1926); J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Cormier-Delanoue
    • 1
  1. 1.Fondation Louis de BroglieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations