Foundations of Physics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Elements of reality, Lorentz invariance, and the product rule

  • O. Cohen
  • B. J. Hiley
Article

Abstract

Recently various gedankenexperiments have been formulated which argue that the assumption that “elements of reality” are Lorentz invariant cannot be reconciled with standard quantum mechanics. Two of these gedankenexperiments were subsequently analyzed using the notion of pre- and postselected quantum systems, and it was claimed that elements of reality can be made Lorentz invariant if the “product rule” of standard quantum mechanics is abandoned. In this paper we show that the apparent violations of the product rule in these gedankenexperiments are not as significant as they appeared to be in the previous analysis. We conclude that the problems with Lorentz invariance which arise in these gedankenexperiments are essentially unrelated to the product rule violations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Vaidman.Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3369 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Hardy.Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Clifton, C. Pagonis, and I. Pitowsky, inPhilosophy of Science Association 1992, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, eds. (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing. Michigan, 1992), pp. 114–128.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz,Phys. Rev. 134, B1410 (1964).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. Cohen,Phys. Rev. A 51, 4373 (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. B. Griffiths,J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Routledge, London, 1993).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. D. Sharp and N. Shanks,Philos. Sci. 60, 488 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Cohen and B. J. Hiley.Phys. Rev. A 52, 76 (1995).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Bub and H. Brown,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2337 (1986).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. B. Griffiths,Found. Phys. 23, 1601 (1993).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Omnès,Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339 (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Cohen
    • 1
  • B. J. Hiley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations