Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 379–390 | Cite as

The propagation of optical radiation in tissue. II: Optical properties of tissues and resulting fluence distributions

  • Michael S. Patterson
  • Brian C. Wilson
  • Douglas R. Wyman
Article

Abstract

This paper is the second of two reviewing the propagation of electromagnetic radiation of wavelength 0.25–10μm in tissue. This part begins with a discussion of how the fundamental optical interaction coefficients of tissue may be measured. Both direct methods, in which the coefficients are measured for optically thin samples, and indirect methods, in which the coefficients are inferred from measurements on bulk samples are described. The difficulties inherent in both types of measurement are outlined. Next the wavelength dependence of the scattering and absorption coefficient is discussed, both from a heuristic point of view and by illustration from current literature. We illustrate how the optical spectrum can be divided into regions where the propagation of light is dominated by absorption or scattering effects. Finally we show how the distribution of light fluence in these spectral regions is dramatically different and illustrate the important features of these distributions.

Key words

Tissue optics Absorption Scattering Fluence distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patterson MS, Wilson BC, Wyman DR. The propagation of optical radiation in tissue I. Models of radiation transport and their application.Lasers Med Sci 1991,6:155–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson BC, Patterson MS, Flock ST. Indirect versus direct techniques for the measurement of the optical properties of tissues.Photochem Photobiol 1987,46:601–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van de Hulst HC.Multiple Light Scattering Tables, Formulas and Applications. New York: Academic Press, 1980Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flock ST, Wilson BC, Patterson MS. Total attenuation coefficients and scattering phase functions of tissues and phantom materials at 633 nm.Med Phys 1987,14:835–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacques SL, Prahl SA. Modeling optical and thermal distribution in tissue during laser irradiation.Lasers Surg Med 1987,6:494–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marchesini R, Bertoni A, Andreola S et al. Extinction and absorption coefficients and scattering phase functions of human tissues in vitro.Appl Opt 1989,28:2318–24Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peters VG, Wyman DR, Patterson MS, Frank GL. Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissue in the visible and near infrared.Phys Med Biol 1990,35:1217–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Key H, Davies ER, Jackson PC, Wells PNT. Optical attenuation characteristics of breast tissues at visible and near infrared wavelengths.Phys Med Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marijnissen JPA, Star WM. Phantom measurements for light dosimetry using isotropic and small aperture detectors. In: Doiron DR, Gomer CJ (eds)Porphyrin Localization and Treatment of Tumors. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984:133–48Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin JL. Lecarpentier Y, Antonetti A, Grillon G. Picosecond laser stereometry light scattering measurements on biological material.Med Biol Eng Comput 1980,18:250–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Svaasand LO, Gomer CJ. Optics in tissue. In: Muller GJ, Sliney DH (eds)Dosimetry of Laser Radiation in Medicine and Biology Vol. IS-5. Bellingham: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, 1990:113–32Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacques SL, Alter CA, Prahl SA. Angular dependence of HeNe laser light scattering by human dermis.Lasers Life Sci 1987,1:309–33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruls WAG, van der Leun JC. Forward scattering properties of human epidermal layers.Photochem Photobiol 1984,40:231–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poulet P, Chambron J. Photoacoustic spectroscopy of human skin. In: Bensasson RV, Jori G, Land EJ, Truscott TG (eds)Primary Photo-Processes in Biology and Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1985:167–70Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson RR, Beck H, Bruggeman U et al. Pulsed photothermal radiometry in turbid media: internal reflection of backscattered radiation strongly influences optical dosimetry.Appl Opt 1989,28:2256–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herman M, Lenoble J. Asymptotic radiation in a scattering and absorbing medium.J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 1968,8:355–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bohren CF, Huffman DR.Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. New York: Wiley, 1983Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mie G. Beitrage zur Optik truber Medien speziell kolloidaler Metallosungen.Ann Phys 1908,25:377–445Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anderson RR, Hu J, Parrish JA. Optical radiation transfer in the human skin and applications in in vivo remittance spectroscopy. In: Marks R, Payne PA (eds)Bioengineering and the Skin. Lancaster: MTP, 1981:253–65Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson BC, Patterson MS. The physics of photodynamic therapy.Phys Med Biol 1986,31:327–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Preuss LE, Profio AE (eds). Tissue optics (feature issue).Appl Opt 1989, 28Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson BC, Jeeves WP, Lowe DM. In vivo and postmortem measurements of the attenuation spectra of light in mammalian tissue.Photochem Photobiol 1985,42:153–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Preuss LE, Bolin FP. Errors in photophysics measurements.Lasers Life Sci 1987,1:334–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Groenhuis RAJ, Ten Bosch JJ, Ferwerda HA. Scattering and absorption of turbid materials determined from reflection measurements. 2: Measuring method and calibration.Appl Opt 1983,22:2463–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patterson MS, Chance B, Wilson BC. Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the noninvasive measurement of tissue optical properties.Appl Opt 1989,28:2331–6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Star WM, Marijnissen JPA, van Gemert MJC. Light dosimetry in optical phantoms and in tissues: I. Multiple flux and transport theory.Phys Med Biol 1988,33:437–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wyman DR, Patterson MS. A discrete method of anisotropic angular sampling in Monte Carlo simulations.J Comp Phys 1988,76:414–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wyman DR, Patterson MS, Wilson BC. Similarity relations for anisotropic scattering in Monte Carlo simulations of deeply penetrating neutral particles.J Comp Phys 1989,81:137–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Star WM, Marijnissen JPA, Jansen H et al. Light dosimetry for photodynamic therapy by whole bladder wall irradiation.Photochem Photobiol 1987,46:619–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bolin FP, Preuss LE, Taylor RC, Ference RJ. Refractive index of some mammalian tissues using a fiber optic cladding method.Appl Opt 1989,28:2297–303Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flock ST, Patterson MS, Wilson BC, Wyman DR. Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues—I: Model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989,36:1162–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moes CJM, van Gemert MJC, Star WM et al. Measurements and calculations of the energy fluence rate in a scattering and absorbing phantom at 633 nm.Appl Opt 1989,28:2292–6Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bonner RF, Nossal R, Havlin S, Weiss GH. Model for photon migration in turbid biological media.J Opt Soc Am 1987,4:423–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilson BC, Farrell TJ, Patterson MS. An optical fiberbased diffuse reflectance spectrometer for non-invasive investigation of photodynamic sensitizers in vivo. In: Gomer CJ (ed)Future Directions and Applications in Photodynamic Therapy Vol. IS6. Bellingham: SPIE, 1990:219–32Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilksch PA, Jacka F, Blake AJ. Studies of light propagation through tissue. In: Doiron DR, Gomer CJ (edsPorphyrin Localization and Treatment of Tumours. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984:149–61Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barbour RL, Gruber H, Lubowsky J. Significance of position and angle dependent backscattered flux for optical studies of tissues.Biophys J (in press)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chance B, Nioka S, Kent J et al. Time resolved spectroscopy of hemoglobin and myoglobin in resting and ischemic muscle.Anal Biochem 1989,174:698–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Langerholc J. Beam broadening in dense scattering media.Appl Optics 1982,21:1593–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Delpy DT, Cope M, van der Zee P et al. Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time-offlight measurements.Phys Med Biol 1988,33:1433–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Doiron DR, Svaasand LO, Profio AE. Light dosimetry in tissue: application to photoradiation therapy. In: Kessel D, Dougherty TJ (eds)Porphyrin Photosensitization. New York: Plenum, 1983:63–76Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jacques SL. Time resolved propagation of ultrashort laser pulses within turbid tissues.Appl Opt 1989,28:2223–9Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Profio AE, Sarnaik J. Fluorescence of HPD for tumor detection and dosimetry in photoradiation therapy. In: Doiron DR, Gomer CJ (eds)Porphyrin Localization and Treatment of Tumors. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984:163–75Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilson BC, Patterson MS, Burns DM. Effect of photosensitizer concentration in tissue on the penetration depth of photoactivating light.Lasers Med Sci 1986,1:235–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Patterson MS, Wilson BC, Feather JW et al. The measurement of dihematoporphyrin ether concentration in tissue by reflectance spectrophotometry.Photochem Photobiol 1987,46:337–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Boulnois JL. Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: a review.Lasers Med Sci 1986,1:47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hale GM, Querry MR. Optical constants of water in 200 nm to 20μm wavelength region.Appl Opt 1973,12:555–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Baillière Tindall 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Patterson
    • 1
  • Brian C. Wilson
    • 1
  • Douglas R. Wyman
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre and McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations