A new very sensitive LSC procedure for determination of Tc-99 in environmental samples

  • D. Jordan
  • R. Schupfner
  • H. Schüttelkoff
Advances in Instrumentation and Sofware for Radioanalytical Techniques

Abstract

A new method for the determination of Tc-99 in different environmental samples has been developed. The sample is carefully ashed in a muffle furnace and then fused with Na2CO3 and K2CO3. The first step is an enrichment and purification of TcO 4 on an anion exchange resin. The Tc is desorbed as a cationic thiourea complex, which is held on a cation exchange resin. The complex is destroyed by oxidation to TcO 4 with (NH4)2S2O8 in sulfuric acid. From this solution TcO 4 is extracted into TBP/toluene and the organic phase is mixed with a scintillation cocktail and counted in an anticoincidence shielded LSC. Tc-99m is used as a chemical yield tracer. The decontamination factors for all important fission and activation products and naturally occurring radionuclides are in the range between > 105 and > 108. The detection limit is about 5 mBq per sample at a counting time of 1000 minutes. The maximum sample amount of plants is 500 g dry weight and therefore the lowest detection limit achievable is 10 mBq/kg. Ashing and dissolution of the samples takes 24 h and 4 analyses are performed by one technician in 8 hours. The chemical yield ranges from 50 to 80%.

Keywords

Radionuclide Cation Exchange Thiourea Anion Exchange Environmental Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. HOLM, J. RIOSECO, M. GARCIA-LEON, Nuc. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 223 (1984) 204–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. KORKISCH, Handbook of Ion Exchange Resins, Vol. V, pp. 19–26, CRC Press 1989Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. SANSONI, W. KRACKE, Z. anal. Chem. 243 (1968) 209–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. KOPUNEC, F. MACASEK, P. RAJEC, D. HUDECOVA, J. Radioanal. Chem 51 (1979) 401–405Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. R. WALKER, B. W. SHORT, H.S. SPRING, in: radioelement analysis, progress and problems, Proc. 23rd Conf. on Analytical Chemistry in energy technology (Ann Arbor Science Publ., Michigan USA 1980) p. 101Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CH. SCHEUERER, R. SCHUPFNER, H. SCHÜTTELKOPF, this issue.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. KÖNIG, R. SCHUPFNER, H. SCHÜTTELKOPF, this issue.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Jordan
    • 1
  • R. Schupfner
    • 1
  • H. Schüttelkoff
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory, Institut für organische ChemieUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Karlsruhe Nuclear Research CenterKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations