Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 61, Issue 1–2, pp 47–64

Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest

  • Roger H. Shaw
  • Ulrich Schumann
Article
  • 636 Downloads

Abstract

A large-eddy simulation has been performed of an atmospheric surface layer in which the lower third of the domain is occupied by a drag layer and heat sources to represent a forest. Subgridscale processes are treated using second-order closure techniques. Lateral boundaries are periodic, while the upper boundary is a frictionless fixed lid. Mean vertical profiles of wind velocity derived from the output are realistic in their shape and response to forest density. Similarly, vertical profiles of Reynolds stress, turbulent kinetic energy and velocity skewness match observations, at least in a qualitative sense. The limited vertical extent of the domain and the artificial upper boundary, however, cause some departures from measured turbulence profiles in real forests. Instantaneous turbulent velocity and scalar fields are presented which show some of the features obtained by tower instrumentation in the field and in wind tunnels, such as the vertical coherence of vertical velocity and the slope of structures revealed by temperature patterns.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldocchi, D. D. and Meyers, T. P.: 1988, ‘Turbulence Structure in a Deciduous Forest’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 43, 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergström, H. and Högström, U.: 1989, ‘Turbulent Exchange above a Pine Forest II. Organized Structures’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 49, 231–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, K. W. and Covey, W.: 1966, ‘The Energy-Budget Evaluation of the Micro-meteorological Transfer Process within a Cornfield’,Agric. Meteorol. 3, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cionco, R. M.: 1979, ‘A Summary of an Analysis of Canopy Flow Coupling for a Variety of Canopy Types’, pp. 105–106, preprint volume, 14th Conference of the American Meteorological Society on Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Deardorff, J. W.: 1972, ‘Numerical Investigation of Neutral and Unstable Planetary Boundary Layers’,J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denmead, O. T. and Bradley, E. F.: 1985, ‘Flux-Gradient Relationships in a Forest Canopy’, in B. A. Hutchison and B. B. Hicks (eds.),The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 421–442.Google Scholar
  7. Finnigan, J. J.: 1979, ‘Turbulence in Waving Wheat II. Structure of Momentum Transfer’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 213–236.Google Scholar
  8. Gao, W., Shaw, R. H., and Paw, U. K. T.: 1989, ‘Observation of Organized Structure in Turbulent Flow within and above a Forest Canopy’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 47, 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, Z. J., Miller, D. R., and Lin, J. D.: 1985, ‘A First-Order Closure Scheme to Describe Counter-Gradient Momentum Transport in Plant Canopies’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 33, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moeng, C.-H.: 1984, ‘A Large-Eddy-Simulation for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence’,J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., Mason, P. J., Moeng, C.-H., and Schumann, U.: 1992, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of the Convective Boundary Layer: A Comparison of Four Computer Codes’,Turbulent Shear Flows 8 (F. Durstet al., eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A., and Rajagopalan, S.: 1991, ‘Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers’,Applied Mechanics Reviews 44, 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., and Brunet, Y.: 1989, ‘Coherent Eddies in Vegetation Canopies’,Proc. Fourth Australasian Conf. on Heat and Mass Transfer, Christchurch, New Zealand, 9–12 May, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt, H. and Schumann, U.: 1989, ‘Coherent Structure of the Convective Boundary Layer Derived from Large-Eddy Simulations’,J. Fluid Mech. 200, 511–562.Google Scholar
  15. Schumann, U.: 1991, ‘Subgrid Length-Scales for Large-Eddy Simulation of Stratified Turbulence’,Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaw, R. H., den Hartog, G., and Neumann, H. H.: 1988, ‘Influence of Foliar Density and Thermal Stability on Profiles of Reynolds Stress and Turbulence Intensity in a Deciduous Forest’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 45, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw, R. H. and Seginer, I.: 1985, ‘The Dissipation of Turbulence in Plant Canopies’, pp. 200–203, preprint volume, 7th Symposium of the American Meteorological Society on Turbulence and Diffusion, Boulder, Colorado, November 1985.Google Scholar
  18. Shaw, R. H., Tavangar, J., and Ward, D. P.: 1983, ‘Structure of the Reynolds Stress in a Canopy Layer’,J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 1922–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: 1984, ‘A Fully Multidimensional Positive Definite Advection Transport Algorithm with Small Implicit Diffusion’,J. Comput. Phys. 54, 325–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Townsend, A. A.: 1976,The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 429 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Wilson, N. R. and Shaw, R. H.: 1977, ‘A Higher Order Closure Model for Canopy Flow’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 16, 1197–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, J. D.: 1988, ‘A Second-Order Closure Model for Flow Through Vegetation’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 42, 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger H. Shaw
    • 1
  • Ulrich Schumann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.DLR, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsOberpfaffenhofenGermany

Personalised recommendations