Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 253–260 | Cite as

Eusociality has evolved independently in two genera of bathyergid mole-rats — but occurs in no other subterranean mammal

  • J. U. M. Jarvis
  • N. C. Bennett
Article

Summary

Extensive field and laboratory studies show that Damaraland mole-rats, like naked mole-rats, have an extreme form of vertebrate sociality. Colonies usually contain 2 reproductives and up to 39 non-breeding siblings, 90% of whom live a socially-induced lifetime of sterility; they remain in the natal colony, forage for food, defend the colony and care for successive litters. Although there is heightened dispersal following good rainfall, the majority of adult non-reproductives remain in their natal colony and failure to disperse is not directly attributable to habitat saturation or unfavourable soil conditions. A major dispersal event follows the death of a reproductive. Differences in colony cohesion, ethology and the hormonal profiles of non-reproductive animals suggests that eusociality evolved along different pathways in these two phylogenetically divergent genera of the Bathyergidae.

Key words

Mammalian-eusociality Mole-rats Cryptomys Heterocephalus Bathyergidoe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham EG (1976) Radioimmunoassay of oestradiol 17B. In: Breuer H, Hamel D, Kruskemper HL (eds) Methods of hormone analysis. George Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 531–571Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD, Noonan KM, Crespi BJ (1991) The evolution of eusociality. In: Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD (eds) The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 3–44Google Scholar
  3. Allard MW, Honeycutt RL (1992) Nucleotide sequence variation in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene and the phylogeny of African mole-rats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Mol Biol Evol 9:27–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett NC (1988) The trend towards sociality in three species of southern African mole-rats (Bathyergidae): causes and consequences. Ph.D diss., University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett NC (1989) The social structure and reproductive biology of the common mole-rat,Cryptomys h. hottentotus and remarks on the trends in reproduction and sociality in the family Bathyergidae. J Zool London 219:45–59Google Scholar
  6. Bennett NC (1990) Behaviour and social organization in a colony of the Damaraland mole-rat Cryptomys damarensis. J Zool London 220:225–248Google Scholar
  7. Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM (1988a) The social structure and reproductive biology of colonies of the mole-rat,Cryptomys damarensis (Rodentia, Bathyergidae). J Mammal 69:293–302Google Scholar
  8. Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM (1988b) The reproductive biology of the Cape mole-rat,Georychus capensis (Rodentia, Bethyergidae). J Zool London 214:95–106Google Scholar
  9. Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM, Davies KC (1988) Daily and seasonal temperatures in the burrows of rodent moles. S Afr J Zool 23:189–195Google Scholar
  10. Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM, Aguilar GH, McDaid EJ (1991) Growth and development in six species of African mole-rats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). J Zool London 225:13–26Google Scholar
  11. Bennett NC, Clarke BC, Jarvis JUM (1992) A comparison of metabolic acclimation in two species of social mole-rats (Rodentia, Bathyergidae) in southern Africa. J Arid Environ 23:189–198Google Scholar
  12. Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM, Faulkes CG, Millar RP (in press) LH responses to single doses of exogenous GnRH by freshly captured Damaraland mole-rats,Cryptomys damarensis. J Reprod FertGoogle Scholar
  13. Brett RA (1986) The ecology and behaviour of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber, Ruppell) (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Ph.D diss., University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Brett RA (1991) The population structure of naked mole-rat colonies. In: Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD (eds) The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 97–136Google Scholar
  15. Burda H (1990) Constraints of pregnancy and evolution of sociality in mole-rats. With special reference to reproductive and social patterns inCryptomys hottentotus (Bathyergidae, Rodentia). Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 28:26–39Google Scholar
  16. Emlen ST (1982) The evolution of helping. The role of behavioral conflict. Am Nat 119: 40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faulkes CG (1990) Social suppression of reproduction in the naked mole-rat,Heterocephalus glaber. PhD. thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Faulkes CG, Abbott DH, Jarvis JUM (1990a) Social suppression of ovarian cyclicity in captive and wild colonies of naked mole-rats,Heterocephalus glaber. J Reprod Fert 88:559–568Google Scholar
  19. Faulkes CG, Abbott DH, Mellor AL (1990b) Investigation of genetic diversity in wild colonies of naked mole-rats by genetic fingerprinting. J Zool London 221:87–97Google Scholar
  20. Faulkes CG, Abbott DH, Jarvis JUM, Sherriff FE (1990c) LH responses of female naked mole-rats,Heterocephalus glaber, to single and multiple doses of exogenous GnRH. J Reprod Fert 89:317–323Google Scholar
  21. Faulkes CG, Abbott DH, Jarvis JUM (1991) Social suppression of reproduction in male naked mole-rats. J Reprod Fert 91:593–604Google Scholar
  22. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobs DS, Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM, Crowe TM (1991) The colony structure and dominance hierarchy of the Damaraland mole-rat,Cryptomys damarensis (Rodentia: Bathyergidae), from Namibia. J Zool London 224:553–576Google Scholar
  24. Jarvis JUM (1981) Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies. Science 212:571–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC (1991) Ecology and behaviour of the family Bathyergidae. In: Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD (eds) The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 66–96Google Scholar
  26. Kayanja FIB, Jarvis JUM (1971) Histological observations on the ovary, oviduct and uterus of the naked mole-rat. Z Säugetierkd 36:114–121Google Scholar
  27. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1983) An introduction to behavioural ecology. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Michener CD (1969) Comparative social behaviour of bees. Annu Rev Entomol 14:277–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nevo E (1979) Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:269–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD (1991) The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Braude SH (1992) Naked mole-rats. Sci Am 267:72–78Google Scholar
  32. Van Damme MP, Robertson DM, Diczfalusy E (1974) An improved in vitro bioassay method for measuring luteinising hormone (LH) activity using mouse Leydig cell preparations. Acta Endocrinol Copenhagen 77:655–671Google Scholar
  33. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. U. M. Jarvis
    • 1
  • N. C. Bennett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations