Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 349–373 | Cite as

Measuring “publications output” and “publications impact” of faculty members of a university chemistry department

  • F. H. Herbstein
Article

Abstract

The publication and citation records of a group of 34 senior members of the faculty of the Department of Chemistry at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology over the period 1980–90 have been analyzed under the contention that dealing with a small group makes it possible for one to pay adequate attention to the methodology of the measurement and analysis processes. Choosing the most suitable index for measuring “Publications Output” has been considered in detail; it is suggested that it is essential to make allowances for both the number of co-authors and for the lengths of publications in order to obtain a more valid measure than is provided by a simple count of equally-weighted publications. Analogously it is argued that simple citation counts provide an inadequate measure of the impact that publications make on the group outside the authors' immediate circle and thus that it is necessary to subtract self citations and divide the credit for a citation among the co-authors of the publication. Results of the analysis show that in agreement with all previous findings a few members (perhaps less than 20%) produce more than half the publications and receive more than half the citations of the Group as a whole.

Keywords

Small Group Faculty Member Analysis Process Valid Measure Chemistry Department 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. W. Creswell, Faculty Research Performance. Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington D. C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. M. Braxton, A. E. Bayer, Assessing Faculty Scholarly Performances, in Measuring Faculty Research Performance, edited byJ. W. Creswell, pp. 25–42. New Directions for Institutional Research Series (edited by P. T. Terenzini), No. 50, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, London, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Lindsey, Using citations counts as a measure of quality in science,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 189–203.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. G. Sammes, UFC Selection,Chem. Brit. (1989) 1093–1094; primary sourceCommonwealth Universities Yearbook, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Abt,Currents Contents, 30 (1990) No. 39, 7–11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Czapski, A. Frenkel, D. Kohn, A. Shoham, Cooperation between Israeli and foreign researchers,Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 381–400.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Norman, Science Indicators: Healthy...for now,Science, 247 (1990) 803, fromScience and Engineering Indicators — 1989, Government Printing Office, Washington DC 20402; stock number 038-000-00583-9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Abt, Publication practices in various sciences,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 441–447.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Lindsey, Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 389–395.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. F. Fox, Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review,Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983) 285–305.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. S. Blume, R. Sinclair, Chemists in British universities: A study of the reward system in science,American Sociological Review, 38 (1973) 126–138.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Lemoine, The frequency distribution of research papers and patents according to sex. The case of C.S.I.R., India,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 449–469.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Shockley, On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories,Proc. Inst. Radio Engineers, 45 (1957) 279–290.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Anderson, Writer's cramp,Nature, 355 (1992) 101.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. H. Griffith, B. J. Gaffney., A. L. Kwiram., Harden M. McConnell: A celebration of his scientific achievement,J. Phys. Chem., 97 (1993) 2805–2829.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. H. Kwei, Y. T. Lee, M. F. Nicol, S. M. Sung, R. N. Zare, Dudley Herschbach Festschrift,J. Phys. Chem., 97 (1993) 2038–2052.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,J. Washington Acad. Sci., 16 (1926), 317.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Price distribution. An exact formulation of Price's “Square Root Law”,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 211–219.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Kunz, Lotka and Zipf: Paper dragons with fuzzy tails,Scientometrics, 13(1988) 289–297.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. J. Yablonsky, Stable non-Gaussian distributions in scientometrics,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 459–470.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. De Solla Price, A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage process,J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 27 (1976) 272.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Garfield, The most cited papers of all time. SCI 1945–1988. Part 1A. The SCI Top 100 — Will the Lowry Method Ever Be Obliterated?Currents Comments 30 (1990) 3–14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O. H. Lowry, N. J. Losenbrough, A. L. Farr, R. J. Randall, Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,J. Biol. Chem., 193 (1951) 265–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. Cano, N. C. Lind, Citation life cycles of ten citation classics,Scientometrics, 22 (1991) 297–312.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. H. Herbstein, Methods of measuring Debye temperatures and comparison of results for some cubic crystals,Adv. Phys., 10 (1961) 313–355.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. H. Herbstein, Crystalline π-molecular compounds: Chemistry, spectroscopy and crystallography, in:Perspectives in Structural Chemistry, Vol. 4, pp. 166–395, edited byJ. D. Dunitz, J. A. Ibers, Wiley, London and New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Ginsburg,Propellanes: Structures and Reactions, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1975.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. H. Herbstein, J. A. Snyman, The crystal structures at 110 and 300 K of the π-molecular compund pyrene: pyromellitic dianhydride,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond., Ser. A, 264 (1969) 635–662.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact in the life sciences and chemistry,Scientometrics, 14 (1985) 3–15.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Z. Szafran, The 1986 chemistry articles most cited 1986–1988, Plus 1989–1990 data: catalysts, clusters, kinetics, and theory,Current Contents, 31 (1991) 4–15.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Watson, F. H. C. Crick, The structure of deoxyribosenucleic acid,Nature, 171, (1953) 737–738.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Herbstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryTechnion — Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations