Scientometric analysis of the topical content of scientific research and its particularities
- 49 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
A new method for quantitative evaluation of the topical content of scientific research is proposed. The method is based on the analysis of the number and topic of publications in different fields. A mathematical model, describing the connection between level and width of research, between topic renewal and concentration of research is developed. Furthermore, coefficients characterizing various aspects of research are introduced. The theoretical conclusions fit well the factual data obtained from the INIS system. A nucleus of terms defining the most developed directions of research is found in each case. The analysis indicates that the growth rate of publications cannot serve as a reliable criterion of research topicality.
Keywords
Growth Rate Mathematical Model Quantitative Evaluation Factual Data Reliable CriterionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G.M. Dobrov,Science of Science, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1966.Google Scholar
- 2.V.V. Nalimov, Z.M. Mulchenko,Scientometrics. Study of Science Development as an Information Process (in Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 1969.Google Scholar
- 3.D. De Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science. Science about Science, Progress, Moscow, 1976.Google Scholar
- 4.S.D. Haitun,Scientometrics. State and Perspectives, Science, Moscow, 1983.Google Scholar
- 5.Yu.V. Granovsky,Scientometric Analysis of the Information Flows in Chemistry, Nauka, Moscow, 1980.Google Scholar
- 6.A.A. Vasil'kovsky, I.V. Dziekovskaya, Dynamics of publications number in physics and thin layers technique growth and prognosis of this branch of science further development,Scientometrics, Prognostication, Informatics, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1970, pp. 252–268Google Scholar
- 7.A.P. Trofimenko, Scientometric analysis of the development of nuclear physics during the last 50 years,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 2Google Scholar
- 8.Methodological and Methodical Problems of Content-Analysis, Moscow, Leningrad, 1973, issues 1 and 2.Google Scholar
- 9.I.M. Orient, Statistical study of the citing of publications in analytical chemistry,Zavodskaya Laboratoria, 33 (1967) 1383.Google Scholar
- 10.G.B. Preobrazhenskaya, N.M. Prutkova, Yu.V. Granovsky, Analysis of statistical terms in publications on spectral analysis and analytical chemistry,Zavodskaya Laboratoria, 40 (1974) 1240.Google Scholar
- 11.V.M. Potarov, I.N. Lukina, Scientometric analysis of some organic chemistry aspects development, In:Scientometric Research in Chemistry, Moscow, 1974, p. 102.Google Scholar
- 12.G.M. Dobrov, V.V. Borisov, A formalyzed method of anlaysis of the used information content,Scientific and Technical Information, Ser. 2, 8 (1970) 3.Google Scholar
- 13.M.P. Shirshova, Scientometric analysis of some aspects of the high-molecular compound chemistry development, In:Logics of Development and Scientometric Analysis of Some Directions in Chemistry, Moscow, 1976, p. 35.Google Scholar
- 14.A.N. Alekseev, About one method of the tendencies of social sciences development investigation, In:Science and Technology, Leningrad, 1972, N 7, part 1, p.68.Google Scholar
- 15.V.M. Potapov, E.K. Kochetova, Referative journals indexes as a source of scientometric information, In:Logics of Development and Scientometric Analysis of Some Directions in Chemistry, Moscow, 1976, p.95.Google Scholar
- 16.N. Raver, Performance of IR systems, In:Information Retrieval: A Critical View, Philadelphia, Wash, 1967, p.131.Google Scholar
- 17.I.V. Marshakova, Investigation of the key-words frequency vocabulary,Scientific and Technical Information, Ser. 2, 11 (1974) 7.Google Scholar
- 18.S.D. Haitun, Quantitative methods of the science subject concentration determination, In:Social and Psychological Problems of Science, Nauka, Moscow, 1973, p.226.Google Scholar
- 19.S.D. Haitun, On the possibility of scientometric investigation of co-author publications, In:Problems of a Scientist and Scientific Units Activity, Moscow, Leningrad, 1979, p.303.Google Scholar
- 20.M.V. Arapov,Quantitative Linguistics, Science, Moscow, 1988.Google Scholar
- 21.INIS: Thesaurus (Rev. 25), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1986.Google Scholar
- 22.INIS Atomindex; Cumulative Index; Subject Index; IAEA, Vienna, v. 5–16, 1974–1985.Google Scholar
- 23.F. Scarrott, Will Zipf join Gauss?New Scientist, 62 (1974) 402.Google Scholar
- 24.H.S. Sichel, On a distribution law for word frequencies,Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (542) 70 (1975) 542.Google Scholar
- 25.A.I. Yablonsky, Stochastical models of scientific activity, In:System Research, Yearbook 1975, Science, Moscow, 1976, p.5.Google Scholar
- 26.B.C. Brookes, Theory of the Bradford law,Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 180.Google Scholar
- 27.J. Vlachy, Frequency distribution of scientific performance. A bibliography of Lotka's law and related phenomena.Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 109.Google Scholar
- 28.INIS Atomindex; An International Abstracting Service, IAEA, Vienna, v. 5-16, 1974–1985.Google Scholar
- 29.INIS Today, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1977.Google Scholar
- 30.G.P. Dzudi, K. Todeskini, Use and potentional possibilities of INIS and AGRIS information systems in developing countries,IAEA Bulletin, Vienna, (1979) No.2/3, 47.Google Scholar