Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 13, Issue 5–6, pp 239–259 | Cite as

An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes

  • P. Vinkler
Article

Abstract

An attempt is made for the survey and classification of bibliometric indicators applicable for assessment of publication performance of researchers active in natural sciences. Indicators can be classified as publication and citation ones which may refer to impact and quantity of publication activity of researcher(s), teams, institutes or countries. Taking into account the possible reference standards, the indicators are classified as simple, specific, balance, distribution and relative ones. In order to evaluate publication activity both qualitatively and quantitatively, relative citation indicators can be recommended, which relate citations received to the sum of impact factors of the journals, where the papers were published or give the relative measure of the average citedness of papers related to that of papers in journals in a similar subfield.

Keywords

Impact Factor Natural Science Relative Measure Publication Activity Average Citedness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. V. NALIMOV, Z. M. MULCHENKO,Naukometria, Nauka, Moscow, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. R. SOKAL, Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects,Science, 185 (1974) 1115.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. C. ANDERSON, F. NARIN, M. McALLISTER, Publication rating versus peer rating of universities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 3 (1978) 91.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. CROUCH, J. IRVINE, B. R. MARTIN, Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom's research performance in Ocean currents and protein crystallography,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 239.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. LINDSEY, The corrected quality ratio: A composite index of scientific contribution to knowledge,Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978) 349.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. VINKLER, Assessment methods for results of scientific research in the Central Research Institute for Chemistry of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,Kutatás-Fejlesztés, 2 (1984) 35. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. VINKLER, Management system for a scientific research institute based on the assessment of scientific publications,Research Policy, 15 (1985) 77.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. M. LAWANI, A. E. BAYER, Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 59.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. R. JAUCH, W. F. GLUECK, Evaluation of university professors research performance,Management Science, 22 (1975) 66.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin-America and the Caribbean,Intersciencia, 2 (1977) 143.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. NARIN, R. T. SHAPIRO, The extramural role of the NIH as a research support agency,Federation Proceedings, 36 (1977) 2470.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. L. K. GROSS, E. M. GROSS, College libraries and chemical education,Science, 66 (1927) 385.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. DIEKS, H. CHANG, Differences in impact of scientific publications: Some indices derived from a citation analysis,Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976) 247.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. BONITZ, Scientometrischer Vergleich der Publikationstätigkeit akademischer Einrichtungen,Informatik. 31 (1984) 33.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. SCHUBERT, P. CSOBÁDI, J. NAGY, T. BRAUN, Scientometric analysis of the publication activity of 85 Hungarian natural science research institutes, in:A tudamány mint a mérés tárgya, T. BRAUN, E. BUJDOSÓ, I. RUFF (Eds), Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára, Budapest, 1981 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. E. CLARK, The APA study of psychologists,American Psychologist, 9 (1954) 117.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. NARIN, G. PINSKI, H. HOFER GEE, Structure of the biomedical literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 25.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. L. RAISIG, Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial,Science, 131 (1960) 1417.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, Wiley, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. GARFIELD,Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports, — A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Data Base, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1982.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. VINKLER, Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 157.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. HIRST, Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 171.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. Van RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance,Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. VLACHÝ, Trends in the citation impact of physics journals 1974–1983,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B35 (1985) 187.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. O. HAGSTROM, Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments,Sociology of Education, 44 (1971) 375.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. I. YANOVSKY, Citation analysis of significance of scientific journals,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 223.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. C. SMART, C. F. ELTON, Consumption factor scores of psychology journals: Scientometric properties and qualitative implications,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 349.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. E. BURKE, D. de S. PRICE, The distribution of citations from nation to nation on a field by field basis — a computer calculation of the parameters,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 363.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. SCHUBERT, T. BRAUN, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. E. D. KOENIG, Determinants of expert judgement of research performance,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 361.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. R. McALLISTER, F. NARIN, J. G. CORRIGAN, Programmatic evaluation and comparison based on standardized citation scores,IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 30 (1983) 205.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. GARFIELD, Mapping science in the Third World,Science and Public Policy, (1983) 112.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. R. MARTIN, J. IRVINE, Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. F. MOED, A. F. J. Van RAAN, Observations and hypotheses on the phenomenon of multiple citation to a research group's oeuvre,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 17.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. COLE, J. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1973.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. SCHUBERT, S. ZSINDELY, W. GLÄNZEL, T. BRAUN,A tudományos publikációs tevékenység mutatószámai, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára, Budapest, 1982 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT,Scientometric Indicators. A 32 Country Comparative Evaluation of Publication Performance and Citation Impact, World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore, Philadelphia, 1985.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    P. VINKLER, The comparison of some methods for the evaluation of scientific publications,Kutatás-Fejlesztés, 3 (1985) 359. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, World flash on basic research,Scientometrics, 11(1987)9, 11(1987)127, and 12(1987)3.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    H. HOFER GEE, F. NARIN, An analysis of research publications supported by NIH 1973–1980, NIH Program Evaluation Report, NIH Publication No. 86-2777, U.S. Goverment Printing Office, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vinkler
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research Institute for Chemistry of the HungarianAcademy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations