Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 155–205 | Cite as

Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry

  • M. Callon
  • J. P. Courtial
  • F. Laville
Article

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to show how co-word analysis techniques can be used to study interactions between academic and technological research. It is based upon a systematic content analysis of publications in the polymer science field over a period of 15 years. The results concern a.) the evolution of research in different subject areas and the patterns of their interaction; b.) a description of subject area “life cycles”; c.) an analysis of ”research trajectories” given factors of stability and change in a research network; d.) the need to use both science push and technology pull theories to explain the interaction dynamics of a research field. The co-word techniques developed in this paper should help to build a bridge between research in scientometrics and work underway to better understand the economics of innovation.

Keywords

Polymer Life Cycle Content Analysis Research Field Subject Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauin S., B. Michelet,Comprendre la réaction chimique: étude des tendances internationales, mimeo CNRS, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Callon M., J.P. Courtial, F. Laville,Co-word Analysis as a Tool for Evaluating Public Programmes of Research, CSI-NSF, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Callon M., P. Laredo, V. Rabeharisoa, Public technological programmes and the dynamics of techno-economic networks; submitted for publication (French version to appear in:D. Foray (Ed.),L'évaluation économique de la technologie. Economica, 1990).Google Scholar
  4. Callon M., Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, in:J. Law (Ed.),Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Callon M., Techno-economic networks and irreversibility; submitted for publication (French version to appear in:R. Boyer (Ed.)Figures de l'irréversibilité en économie, EHESS, 1990).Google Scholar
  6. Callon M., Law J, Rip A. (Eds),Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, McMillan, London, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Courtial J.P., Qualitative models, quantitative tools and network analysis,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 527.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman C.,The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Frances Pinter 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Grupp H., B. Schwitalla, Technometrics, Bibliometrics, Econometrics and Patent Analysis: Towards a Correlated System of Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators, in:A. Van Raan et al. (Ed.), 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Michelet B.,L'analyse des mots associés, unpublished dissertation, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Narin F., E. Noma, Is technology becoming science?,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 369–381.Google Scholar
  12. Narin F., E. Noma, R. Perry, Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength,Research Policy, 16 (1987) 143.Google Scholar
  13. Nelson R. R., S.G. Winter, In search of a useful theory of innovation,Research Policy, 6 (1977) 36.Google Scholar
  14. Oehler K., W.E. Snizek, N.C. Mullins, Words and sentences over time: How facts are buit and sustained in a specialty area,Science, Technology and Human Values, 14 (1989) 258.Google Scholar
  15. Pavitt K., Sectoral patterns of technological change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory,Research Policy, 13 (1984) 343.Google Scholar
  16. Turner W.A., Chartron G., Laville F., Michelet M., Packaging information for peer review: new co-word analysis techniques, in:A. Van Raan (Ed.)Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier, North Holland, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Van Raan A., A. Nederhof, H. Moed (Eds),Science and Technology Indicators, DSWO Press, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
  18. B.G. Van Vianen, H.F. Moed, A. Van Raan, The assessment of the science base of recent technology,Research Policy, 19 (1990) 61.Google Scholar
  19. Von Hippel E.,The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. Walsh V., Invention and innovation in the chemical industry: Demand pull or discovery push?Research Policy, 13 (1984) 211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Callon
    • 1
  • J. P. Courtial
    • 1
  • F. Laville
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Sociologie de l'InnovationEcole des Mines de ParisParis(France)

Personalised recommendations