Scientometrics

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 219–238 | Cite as

An investigation of research collaboration in the sciences through the philosophical transactions 1901–1991

Article

Abstract

A sample was selected fromThe Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London to examine the development of collaboration in scientific research from 1901–1991. The variables under study were: changes with time, as reflected in the 19 years sampled; the number of collaborative papers, which were subdivided by number of authors, type of collaboration, and the number of unique departmental subject titles; and the number of authors involved in producing collaborative papers, in which the proportion and the mean number of authors per paper were computed according to type of collaboration. It was found that, while the proportion of collaborative papers fluctuated over the years, the number corresponded to an exponential increase over time. The collaboration in the first half of the century was sporadic but grew rapidly in the second half, especially the collaboration involving many authors from different institutions and countries in the production of a publication. The trend toward interdisciplinarity has become pronounced since the 1960s. The phenomenon was found to be associated with the average number of authors per interdisciplinary paper and the type of collaboration. The limitations of the study are indicated and future studies are suggested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Price,Little Science, Big Science. New York, Columbia University Press, 1963, pp. 87–89.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Stefaniak, Individual and multiple authorship of papers in chemistry and physics,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 331–337.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. S. Maheswarappa, A. Vinutha, Collaborative research in genetics,International Library Review, 21 (1989) No. 2, 173–176.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Yitzhaki, D. Ben-Tamar, Multiple authorship in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1905–1988, In:Informetrics 89/90,L. Egghe,R. Rousseau (Eds) Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier, 1990, pp. 373–389.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Ajiferuke, A probabilistic model for the distribution of authorship,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) No. 4, 279–289.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. De B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84; II. Scientific coauthorship, research productivity, and visibility in the French scientific elite,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149; III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 231–245.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. J. Meadows, Scientific collaboration and status, In:Communications in Science, London, Butterworths, 1974. pp. 172–206.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. L. Pao, Co-authorship and productivity, In:Communicating Information: Proceedings of 43rd ASIS Annual Meeting, 1980, Vol. 17, Anaheim, California, Oct. 5–10, 1980. ed. byA. R. Benefeld, E. J. Kazlauskas, New York, Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc., 1980, pp. 279–281.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. L. Pao, Global and local collaborators: a study of scientific collaboration,Information Processing and Management, 28 (1992) No. 1, 99–109.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. L. Logan, W. M. Shaw, Jr., An investigation of the coauthor graph,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38 (1987) No. 4, 262–268.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Pravdic, V. Oluic-Vukovic, Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 259–280.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. M. Lawani, Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study, Ph. D. dissertation. The Florida State University, 1980, p. 297.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Hirsch, J. F. Singleton, Research support, multiple authorship, and publications in sociological journals, 1936–1964, Unpublished paper, Purdue University, 1964.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Patel, Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology,Social Science Information, 12 (1973) No. 6, 77–92.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beaver, Rosen,op. cit. Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84; II. Scientific coauthorship, research productivity, and visibility in the French scientific elite,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149; III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific coauthorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 231–245.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pao,op. cit..Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. G. Heffner, Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 5–12.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Subramanyam, Biblimetric studies of research collaboration: a review,Journal of Information Science, 6 (1983) No. 1, 33–38.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. D. Frame, M. P. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) No. 4, 481–497.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Narvaez-Berthelemot, L. P. Frogoletto, J. F. Miquel, International scientific collaboration in Latin America, In:Les indicateurs de science pour les pais en developpement, ed. byR. Arvanitis, J. Grillard, Paris, Institut Francais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Developpement en Cooperation, 1992, pp. 333–356.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Annual Report 1991, London, The royal Society, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meadows,op. cit.Scientific collaboration and status, In:Communications in Science, London, Butterworths, 1974. pp. 172–206.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Annual Report 1990, London, The Royal Society, 1990, p. 8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. W. Lancaster, S. Abdullah, Science and politics: some bibliometric analyses, In:Les indicateurs de science pour les pais en developpement, ed. byR. Arvanitis, J. Grillard, Paris, Institut Francais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Developpement en Cooperation, 1992, pp. 319–332.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Qin
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Champaign-UrbanaUrbana(USA)

Personalised recommendations