, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 227–236 | Cite as

Indices of journal citation relatedness and citation relationships among aquatic biology journals

  • A. I. Pudovkin
  • Elizabeth A. Fuseler


Simple quantitative indices of pair-wise journal citation relatedness (based on the numbers of references given to and received from a journal title, which are provided by Science Citation Index database) are translated by an automatic clustering procedure into a meaningful map diagram reflecting topical relatedness of journals within a field of science. Such a map for 60 journals in marine and freshwater biology and related sciences published in 1987 reveals a tight cluster of marine biology journals quite distinct from the freshwater biology journal cluster and from the fisheries cluster. The journals within the marine biology cluster and those with strongest pair-wise links with them can be regarded as the core journals in marine biology. Indices of unilateral citation relatedness are used to obtain diagrams, which we term citograms. The citograms visualize patterns of citation relatedness of a journal (its citing and being cited). Journal self-citation can be meaningfully estimated using the bilateral index of relatedness. Self-citation is high in specialized or regional journal titles. It also appears to be quite substantial in journals of broader scope, which possibly reflect authors' subjective preferences.


Marine Biology Science Citation Index Freshwater Biology Subjective Preference Journal Title 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Garfield, 1990. Journal citation studies. 53. Agricultural sciences: most fruitful journals and high yield research fields.Current Contents, No. 51, p. 5–18. Reprinted in:Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 13. ISI Press, 1991, p. 455–467.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Garfield, 1980. The literature of marine biology.Biologiya Morya, No. 3, p. 3–20. In Russian. (Also published in:Soviet Journal of Marine Biology, 7 (1981) 137–152.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Zhirmunsky, 1980. Comments of the Editor on the paper by E. Garfield.Biologiya Morya, No. 3, p. 20–22. (In Russian) (Also published in:Soviet Journal of Marine Biology, 7 (1981) 152–153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Garfield, 1987. Journal citation studies. 47. What oceanography journals make the biggest waves?—Current Contents, Vol. 30, No. 48, pp. 3–11. Reprinted in:Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 10. ISI Press, 1989, p. 361–369.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Fuseler-McDowell, 1988. Documenting the literature of marine biology. In:Marine Science Information Throughout the World.Winn, Burkhart, Burkhart (Eds), IAMSLIC, pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. I. Pudovkin, 1993a. Citation relationships among marine biology journals and those in related fields.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 100: 207–209.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. I. Pudovkin, 1993b. Journals in marine biology and adjacent area: a bibliometric study of citation links among the journals. (In Russian), Vladivostok, Institute of Marine Biology Deposited in VINITY (Moscow), p. 68.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. B. Kruskal, 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a non-metric hypothesis.Psychometrica, Vol. 29, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. H. A. Sneath, R. R. Sokal, 1973.Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, Freeman. p. 573.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. G. Rohlf, 1988.NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. New York, Exeter Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Pudovkin
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Fuseler
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Biology, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostok(Russia)
  2. 2.The Libraries, 215 Morgan LibraryColorado State UniversityFort Collins(USA)

Personalised recommendations