Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others
- 430 Downloads
The citation motivations among 51 self citing authors in several natural science disciplines were investigated. Results of a survey on reasons for both self citation and citation to others show that there are very few differences in motivation, and that there are plausible intellectual grounds for those differences which are substantial. Analysis of exposure in text reveals virtually no differences between self citations and citations to others. Analysis of individual disciplines also uncover no substantive differences in either motivation or exposure in text.
KeywordsNatural Science Science Discipline Individual Discipline Intellectual Ground Citation Motivation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S.M. Lawani, On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(1982) 281.Google Scholar
- 2.R. Tagliacozzo, Self-citation in scientific literature.Journal of Documentation, 33(4)(1977) 251.Google Scholar
- 4.H.W. Snyder, S. Bonzi, An enquiry into the behavior of author self citation.ASIS '89: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, New Jersey, Learned Information, 1989, pp. 147–51.Google Scholar
- 5.D.E. Chubin S.D. Moitra, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?Social Studies of Science, 5(1975) 423.Google Scholar
- 6.M.J. Moravcsik, P. Murugesan, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5(1975) 86.Google Scholar
- 7.C.O. Forst, The use of citations in literature research: A preliminary classification of citation functions,Library Quarterly, 49(1979) 399.Google Scholar
- 8.I. Spiegel-Rösing, Bibliometric and content analysis,Social Studies of Science, 7(1977) 97.Google Scholar
- 9.T.A. Brooks, Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1985) 223.Google Scholar