Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 351–366 | Cite as

Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties

  • O. Persson
  • M. Beckmann
Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to describe the social circles, networks, or invisible colleges etc that make a scientific speciality in terms of (mathematically precise) sets generated by documents citation and accessible through theSocial Science Citation Index\TM. The document and author sets that encompass a scientific speciality are the basis for some interdependent citation matrices. We illustrate our method of construction of these sets and matrices through an application to the literature on \ldinvisible colleges\rd.

Keywords

Science Citation Citation Index Science Citation Index Social Circle Document Citation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. 1.
    D. de S. Price, Networks of scientific papers,Science, 149 (1965) 510–515.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. M. Kessler, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,American Documentation, 14 (1963) 10–25.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. C. Mullins, The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists,American Sociological Review, 33 (1968) 786–797.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Crane,Invisible Colleges, Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. G. Small, B. C. Griffith, The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties,Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17–40.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. D. White, B. C. Griffith, Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–172.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Crane,op. cit., note 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. de S. Price Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. E. Chubin, State of the field. The conceptualization of scientific specialities,Sociological Quarterly, 17 (1976) 448–476.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. E. Chubin, Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 221–254.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. E. Chubin,op. cit., note 10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Forman, Financial support and political alignment of physicists in Weimar Germany,Minerva, 12 (1974) 39–66;W. Lepenies, History and anthropology — historical appraisal of current contact between disciplines,Social Science Information, 15 (1976) 287–306;B. F. Reskin, Sex-differences in status attainment in science — case of postdoctoral fellowship,American Sociological Review, 41 (1976) 597–612.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Persson
    • 1
  • M. Beckmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Inforsk Department of SociologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Institutet för FramtidsstudierStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations