Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 135–156 | Cite as

The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI

  • L. Leydesdorff
  • Susan E. Cozzens
Invited Papers

Abstract

In order to attribute journals to specialties in a dynamic journal set by using aggregated journal-journal citations derived from theScience Citation Index, it is necessary to complement the multi-variate analysis of this data with a time-serices perspective. This calls for a more analytical approach to the problem of choice among the many possible parameters for clustering. Changes in the disciplinary structure of science are tracked by using thedifferences among the multi-variate analyses for the various years. It is impossible to attribute change systematically to structure, noise, or deviance if these uncertainties are not clearly definedex ante. The study discusses the various choices which have to be made, in both conceptual and methodological terms. In addition to hierarchies among journals, one has to assume heterarchy among journal groups (and their centroids). For comprehensive mapping, a concept of “macro-journals” as representations of a density of points in the multi-dimensinoal space is defined. Empirical reslts indicate the feasibility of dynamic journal-journal mapping by using these methods.

Keywords

Analytical Approach Citation Index Comprehensive Mapping Disciplinary Structure Journal Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Narin,Evaluative Bibliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, 1976, 190–203.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Leydesdorff, Problem with the ‘measurement’ of natinal scientific performance,Science & Public Policy, 15 (1988) 149–152.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Anderson, P.M.D. Collins, J. Irvine, P.A. Isard, B.R. Martin, F. Narin, K. Stevens, Oline approaches to mesuring to measuring national scientific output: a cautionary tale,Science & Public Policy, 15 (1988) 153–161.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Leydesdorff, The Science Citation Index and the measurement of national performance in terms of numbers of scientific publications,Scientomatrics, 17 (1989) 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Assessing assessments of British science: some facts and figures to accept or to decline,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.R. Martin, The bibliometrics assessments of UK scientific performance. a reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 333–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance. Some comments of Martins' reply,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 359–62.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Leydesdorff, On the “Scientometric Decline” of British science. One additional graph in response to Ben Martin,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 363–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Keyley, Government-funded academic science is a consumer good, not a producer good: A comaprative reassessment f Britain's scientific and technological achievements since 1794 and a comment on the bibliometry of B. Martin and J. Irvine,Scientometrics, 20 (1990) 369–94.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. de Solla Price, The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Noma, An improved method for analyzing square scientometric transaction matrices,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.P. Carpenter, F. Narin, Clustering of scientific journals,Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 24 (1973) 425–35.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Narin,Evaluative Bbliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ, 1976, pp. 185 ff.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Doreian, T.J. Fararo, Structural equivalence in a journal network,Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 35 (1985) 28–37.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Leydesdorff, The development of, rames of references,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Doreian, A revised measure of standing of journals in statified networks,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Leydesdorff, Various methods for the mapping of science,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 291–320.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Tussen, J. de Leeuw, A.F.J. van Raan, Quasi-correspondence analysis on square scientometric transaction matrices,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 347–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Todorov, W. Glänzel, Journal citation measures: a concise review,Journal of Information Science, 4 (1988) 47–56.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Leydesdorff, Some methodological guidelines for the interpretation of scientometric mappings,R&D Evaluation Newsletter, (1989) Nr 2, 4–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Burt, Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups, In:R. Burt, M.J. Minor,Applied Network Aalysis, Beverly Hills, Sage, 1983, 276f.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Burt,Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Academic Press, London, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.J.W. Tussen, J. de Leeuw, MVA methods in bibliometric studies, In:A.F.J. Van Raan (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Studies, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Leydesdorff, The prediction of science indicators using information theory,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 297–324.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Leydesdorff, The static and dynamic analysis of network data using information theory,Social Networks, 13 (1991) 301–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.-O. Kim, C.W. Mueller,Factor Analysis, Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage, Beverly Hills/London, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.J. Norussis,SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics, SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Wamelink, A quantitative strategy for the delineation of scientific fields: a case study of the emergence of biotechnology (in prearation).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Small, E. Sweeney, E. Greenlee, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations II. Mapping science,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 321–40.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.E. Cozzens, L. Leydesdorff, Journal systems as macro-indicators of structural change in the sciences, In:A.F.J. Van Raan, (Ed.)Proceedings of the Joint EC/Leiden Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, DSWO, Leiden (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. Leydesdorff, S.E. Cozzens, P. Van den Besselaar, Tracking areas of strategic importance by using scientometric journal mappings, Paper presented at the4S/EASST Joint Conference, August 1992.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Leydesdorff, Irreversibilities in science and technology networks: An empricial and analytical approach,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Leydesdorff
    • 1
  • Susan E. Cozzens
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Science DynamicsAmsterdam(The Netherlands)
  2. 2.Department of Science and Technology StudiesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroy(USA)

Personalised recommendations