Microbial Ecology

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 141–155 | Cite as

Ecological aspects of microorganisms inhabiting uranium mill tailings

  • Christine L. Miller
  • Edward R. Landa
  • David M. Updegraff
Article

Abstract

Numbers and types of microorganisms in uranium mill tailings were determined using culturing techniques.Arthrobacter were found to be the predominant microorganism inhabiting the sandy tailings, whereasBacillus and fungi predominated in the slime tailings. Sulfate-reducing bacteria, capable of leaching radium, were isolated in low numbers from tailings samples but were isolated in significantly high numbers from topsoil in contact with the tailings. The results are placed in the context of the magnitude of uranium mill tailings in the United States, the hazards posed by the tailings, and how such hazards could be enhanced or diminished by microbial activities. Patterns in the composition of the microbial population are evaluated with respect to the ecological variables that influence microbial growth.

Keywords

United States Uranium Radium Nature Conservation Microbial Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beveridge TJ, Koval SF (1981) Binding of metals to cell envelopes ofEscherichia coli K-12. Appl Environ Microbiol 42(2):325–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beveridge TJ, Murray RG (1976) Uptake and retention of metals by cell walls ofBacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 127(3):1502–1518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beveridge TJ, Murray RG (1980) Sites of metal deposition in the cell walls ofBacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 141(2):876–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boylen CW (1973) Survival ofArthrobacter crystallopoietes during prolonged periods of extreme desiccation. J Bacteriol 113(1):33–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boylen CW, Mulks MH (1978) The survival of coryneform bacteria during periods of prolonged nutrient starvation. J Gen Microbiol 105:323–334Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buck JD (1982) Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 44(4):992–993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crock JG, Lichte FE, Briggs PH (1983) Determination of elements in National Bureau of Standards' geological reference materials SRM 278 obsidian and SRM 688 basalt by inductively coupled argon plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. Geostand Newsl 7(2):335–340Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cypionka H, Widdell F, Pfennig N (1985) Survival of sulfate-reducing bacteria after oxygen stress, and growth in sulfate-free oxygen-sulfide gradients. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:39–45Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeHaan H (1977) Effect of benzoate on microbial decomposition of fulvic acids in Tjeukemeer (the Netherlands). Limnol Oceanogr 22(1):38–44Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engleman EE, Jackson LL, Norton DR (1985) Determination of carbonate carbon in geologic materials by coulometric titration. Chem Geol 53:125–128Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gottschal JC, Szewzyk R (1985) Growth of a facultative anaerobe under oxygen-limiting conditions in pure culture and in co-culture with a sulfate-reducing bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31(3):159–170Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guonot AM (1967) Role biologique desArthrobacter dans les limons souterrains. Annales de L'Institut Pasteur 113:923–945PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hardy JA, Hamilton WA (1981) The oxygen tolerance of sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from North Sea waters. Current Microbiol 6:259–262Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horvath RS, Alexander M (1970) Cometabolism of m-chlorobenzoate by anArthrobacter. Appl Microbiol 20:254–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hutchinson M, Johnstone KJ, White B (1966) Taxonomy of the acidophilicThiobacilli. J Gen Microbiol 44(3):373–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jorgensen BB (1977) Bacterial sulfate reduction within reduced microniches of oxidized marine sediments. Mar Biol 41:7–17Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalin M, Stokes PM (1981) Macrofungi on uranium mill tailings—associations and metal content. Sci Total Environ 19:83–94Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keddie RM, Jones D (1981) Saprophytic, aerobic coryneform bacteria. In: Starr MP, Stolp H, Truper HG, Balows A, Schegel HG (eds) The prokaryotes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 1838–1878Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein DA, Davis JA, Casida LE (1968) Oxidation of n-alkanes to ketones by anArthrobacter species. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 34:495–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Labeda DP, Liu KC, Casida LE (1976) Colonization of soil byArthrobacter andPseudomonas under varying conditions of water and nutrient availability as studied by plate counts and transmission electron microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 31(4):551–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landa ER, Miller CL, Updegraff DM (1986) Leaching of226Ra from uranium mill tailings by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Health Phys 51 4:509–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Loring DH (1978) Industrial and natural inputs, levels, behavior, and dynamics of biologically toxic heavy metals in the Saguenay Fjord, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. In: Krumbein WE (ed) Environmental biogeochemistry and geomicrobiology 3: methods, metals and assessment. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp 1025–1040Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Markos G, Bush KJ (1982) Geochemical processes in uranium mill tailings and their relationship to contamination in management of wastes from uranium mining and milling. Proc Symp, Albuquerque, May 1982. Int Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 231–246Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mathur SP, Paul EA (1967) Microbial utilization of soil humic acids. Can J Microbiol 13: 573–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCready RG, Bland CJ, Gonzales DE (1980) Preliminary studies on the chemical, physical, and biological stability of Ba/RaSO4 precipitates. Hydrometallurgy 5:109–116Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merritt RC (1971) Active uranium plants in the United States. In: Merritt RC (ed) The extractive metallurgy of uranium. Colorado School of Mines Research Institute, Golden, Colorado, pp 400–511Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mulder EG, Antheunisse J (1963) Morphologie, physiologie et ecologie desArthrobacter. Ann Inst Pasteur, Paris, 105:46–74Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Novick RP, Roth C (1968) Plasmid-linked resistance to inorganic salts inStaphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 95:1335–1342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Otton JA, Zielinski RA (1985) Movement and concentration of uranium in young, organicrich sediments, Stevens County, Washington. In: Concentration mechanisms of uranium in geologic environments. Int Meeting October 2–5, 1985, French Society of Mineralogy and Crystallography, Center for Research on the Geology of Uranium, Nancy, France, pp 49–52Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1984) Nuclear fact handbook, radioactive waste management and the nuclear fuel cycle. 5(2,3):188Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perez J, Torma AE, Itzkovitch IJ (1983) Effects ofThiobacillus ferrooxidans on bariumradium sulfate in uranium mill tailings. In: Recent progress in biohydrometallurgy. Associazione Mineraria Sarda, Iglesias, Cagliari, Italy, pp 643–656Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Postgate JR (1979) Cultivation and growth. In: Postgate JR (ed) The sulphate-reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 24–40Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reardon EJ, Poscente PJ (1984) A study of gas compositions in sawmill waste deposits: evaluation of the use of wood waste in close-out of pyritic tailings, Reclamation and Revegetation Research. 3:109–128Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Robinson JB, Salonius PO, Chase FE (1965) A note on the differential response ofArthrobacter spp andPseudomonas spp. to drying in soil. Can J Microbiol 11:746–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Skougstad MW, Fishman MJ, Freidman LC, Erdmann DE, Duncan SS (eds) (1979) Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments: techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. Ch Al, Book 5:201–203Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smyk B, Ettlinger L (1963) Recherches sur Quelques Especes D'Arthrobacter Fixatrices D'Azote Isolees Des Roches Karstiques Alpines. Ann Inst Pasteur, Paris, 105:341–348Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stevenson IL (1967) Utilization of aromatic hydrocarbons byArthrobacter spp. Can J Microbiol 13:205–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Strandberg GW, Shumate SE, Parrott JR (1981) Microbial cells as biosorbents for heavy metals: accumulation of uranium bySaccharomyces cerevisiae andPseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 41(1):237–245Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Updegraff DM, Douros JD (1972) The relationship of microorganisms to uranium deposits. Dev Ind Microbiol 13:76–90Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yamada Y, Motoi H, Kinoshita S, Takada N, Okada H (1975) Oxidative degradation of squalene byArthrobacter species. Appl Microbiol 29(3):400–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang IC (1980) Improved method for the determination of dissolved radium in natural water and uranium mill process waste water. Health Phys 39:1059Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zajic JE (1969) Metal-containing metabolites. In: Zajic JE (ed) Microbial biogeochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 289–295Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine L. Miller
    • 1
  • Edward R. Landa
    • 2
  • David M. Updegraff
    • 3
  1. 1.Water Resources DivisionUS Geological SurveyArvadaUSA
  2. 2.Water Resources DivisionUS Geological SurveyRestonUSA
  3. 3.Colorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations