Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 29–38 | Cite as

Trichoderma hamatum: Its hyphal interactions withRhizoctonia solani andPythium spp.

  • I. Chet
  • G. E. Harman
  • R. Baker
Article

Abstract

The mode of hyphal interaction and parasitism ofPythium spp. andRhizoctonia solani byTrichoderma hamatum was studied by both phase-contrast and Nomarski differential interference-contrast microscopy. Directed growth of the mycoparasite toward its host was observed. In the area of interaction,T. hamatum produced appressorial-like structures attached to the host cell wall. Subsequently, several different types of interactions occurred.T. hamatum either grew parallel to and along the host hypha or coiled around its host. In the contrast regions the parasite formed bulbular or hook-like structures that contained granular cytoplasm. In other cases the parasite penetrated into and grew within the mycelium ofR. solani orP. ultimum. As a consequence of the attack, the host hypha became vacuolated, shrank, collapsed, and finally disintegrated. These observations suggest the involvement of parasitism followed by lysis rather than involvement of antibiotics in this host-mycoparasite relationship.

Keywords

Microscopy Cell Wall Host Cell Nature Conservation Trichoderma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Backman. P. A., and R. Rodrigues-Kabana: A system for the growth and delivery of biological control agents to the soil. Phytopathology65, 819–821 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chet, I., and R. Baker: Induction of suppressiveness toRhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology70: 994–998 (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chet, I. and R. Baker: Isolation ofTrichoderma hamatum from soil. naturally suppressive toRhizoctonia solani and its application as a biocontrol agent. Phytopathology (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chet, I., S. Fogel. and R. Mitchell: Chemical detection of microbial prey by predator. J Bacteriol106, 863–867 (1971)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dennis, C., and J. Webster: Antagonistic properties of species-groups ofTrichoderma. I. Production of nonvolatile antibiotics. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.57, 25–39 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis, C., and J. Webster: Antagonistic properties of species-groups ofTrichoderma. II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.57, 41–48 (1971)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis, C., and J. Webster: Antagonistic properties of species-groups ofTrichoderma. III. Hyphal interaction. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.57, 363–369 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elad, Y., I. Chet, and J. Katan:Trichoderma harzianum: A biocontrol agent ofSclerotium rolfssi andRhizoctonia solani, Phytopathology70: 119–121 (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadar, Y., I. Chet, and Y. Henis: Biological control ofRhizoctonia solani damping-off with wheat bran culture ofTrichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology69, 64–68 (1978)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harman, G. E., I. Chet, and R. Baker: Seed treatment withTrichoderma hamatum as a means of preventing seed and seedling disease induced byPythium spp. orRhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoch, H. C., and M. S. Fuller: Mycoparasitic relationship. Morphological features of interactions betweenPythium acanthicum and several fungal hosts. Arch. Microbiol.111, 207–224 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansson, H. B., and B. Norbring-Hertz: Attraction of nematode to living mycelium of nematophagous fungi. J. Gen. Microbiol.112, 89–93 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, D., and D. Watson: Parasitism and lysis by soil fungi ofSclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib) DeBary, a phytopathogenic fungus. Nature224, 281–288 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jordan, E. G., and H. L. Barnett: Nutrition and parasitism ofMelanospora zamiae. Mycologia70, 306–312 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, S., and R. Baker: Mechanism of biological control in soil suppressive toRhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology (in press)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toyama, N., and K. Ogawa: Purification and properties ofTrichoderma viride mycolytic enzymes. J. Ferment. Technol.46, 626–633 (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wells, H. C., K. K. Bell, and C. A. Jawarsky: Efficacy ofTrichoderma harzianum as a biological control forSclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology62, 442–447 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Chet
    • 1
  • G. E. Harman
    • 1
  • R. Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PathologyColorado State UniversityFort Collins

Personalised recommendations