Readability of prescription drug labels by older and younger adults

  • Janan Al-Awar Smither
  • Curt C. Braun


This experiment investigated the readability of medication labels using various combinations of fonts, sizes, and weights of print. Older and younger adult reading speeds and error rates for different print types were compared for both bottle and flat labels. Findings of the study indicated significant differences in reading speed, error rates, and subjective evaluations for print characteristics investigated. Furthermore, the effects of these print characteristics varied for different age groups. Implications of these findings for the design of medication labels for older adults are discussed.

Key words

geriatrics health psychology pharmacy compliance, reading legibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beldie, I. P., Pastoor, S., & Schwarz, E. (1983). Fixed versus variable letter width for televised text.Human Factors, 25, 273–277.Google Scholar
  2. FMC Corporation (1985).Product safety sign and label system. Santa Clara, CA: FMC Corp.Google Scholar
  3. Krulee, G. K., & Novy, F. (1986). Word processing and effects of variability in type fonts.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 999–1010.Google Scholar
  4. Leirer, V. O., Morrow, D. G., Pariante, G. M., & Sheikh, J. I. (1988). Elders' nonadherence, its assessment, and computer assisted instruction for medication recall training.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 36, 877–884.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moore, S. R., Kalu, M., & Yavaprabbas, S. (1983). Receipt of prescription drug information by the elderly.Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy, 17, 920–923.Google Scholar
  6. Morrell, R. W., Park, D. C., & Poon, L. W. (1990). Effects of labelling techniques on memory and comprehension of prescription information in young and older adults.Journal of Gerontology, 45, 166–172.Google Scholar
  7. Morrow, D. G., Leirer, V. O., & Sheikh, J. I. (1988). Adherence and medication instructions: Review and recommendations.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 36, 1147–1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Park, D. C., Morrell, R. W., Frieske, D., & Kinkaid, D. (1992). Medication adherence behaviors in older adults: Effects of external cognitive supports.Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 252–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Paterson, D. G., & Tinker, M. A. (1940).How to make type readable. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  10. Payne, D. E. (1967). Readability of typewritten material: Proportional versus standard spacing.Journal of Typographic Research, 1(2).Google Scholar
  11. Poulton, E. C. (1959). Effects of printing types and formats on the comprehension of scientific journals.Nature, 184, 1824–1825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Poulton, E. C. (1969). Skimming lists of food ingredients printed in different sizes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 55–58.Google Scholar
  13. Ralph, J. B. (1982). A geriatric visual concern: The need for publishing guidelines.Journal of the American Optometric Association, 53(1), 43–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tinker, M. A. (1963).Legibility of print. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Vanderplas, J. M., & Vanderplas, J. H. (1980). Some factors affecting legibility of printed materials for older adults.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 923–932.Google Scholar
  16. Zuccollo, G., & Liddell, H. (1985). The elderly and the medication label: Doing it better.Age and Aging, 14, 371–376.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janan Al-Awar Smither
    • 1
  • Curt C. Braun
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of Central FloridaOrlando
  2. 2.The University of IdahoMoscow

Personalised recommendations