Tijdschrift Over Plantenziekten

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 120–129 | Cite as

Afsterving van kasdruiven door phomopsis spec

  • D. Mulder
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Summary

A disease of grape vines cultivated in glasshouses is described. The symptoms proved to be identical with those of the dead-arm disease, which occurs in the U.S.A. The fungus isolated from diseased stems is aPhomopsis-species like the one isolated byGoidanich in Italy. It may be identical to the fungus causing dead-arm disease, as described byReddick. Pycnidia with normal pycnospores and scolecospores are to be found on the trunks.

The symptoms are a wilting and dying off of part of the vine and the presence of „longitudinal ribbed excrescences on the trunk” as described bijReddick. A rot of berries and necrotic lesions on young shoots have not yet been found. Tumors caused byBacterium tumefaciensSm. etTowns. and aSphaeropsis-species are sometimes accompanying the attack byPhomopsis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Coleman, Leslie C., The dead-arm disease of grapes in Ontario. Sc. Agric. VIII: 5, 1928, p. 281–315.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diedicke, H., Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg 1915, p. 277.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Du Plessis, S. J., The occurrence of the dead-arm disease of vines in South Africa. Dep. of Agric. and For. Sc. Bull. 29, 1938.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goidanich, G., Notizie su una malattia della vite poco conosciuta. Rendic. R. Accad. Naz. Lincei XXVI, 1937, p. 107–112.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gregory, C. T., A rot of grapes caused bij Cryptosporella viticola. Journal of Phytopathology III: 1, 1913, p. 29–33.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grove, W. B., British stem and leaf fungi. Vol. I, 1935, p. 237.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hewitt, W. B., Dead-arm disease, of the grape vine in California. Blue anchor XIV, 1937, p. 3 and 26.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiura, M., On the root-neck blight of the vines near Sapporo. Journ. Agric. Forest Soc. Sapporo, XVI, p. 63–78, 1924. ref. Rev. Appl. Myc. IV, p. 650, 1925.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niemeyer, L., Die durch Pseudomonas tumefaciens Sm. et Towns. verursachte Mauke der Weinreben. Centr. Bl. Bakt. II, XCII, p. 116–162, 1935.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petri, L., Rassegno dei casi fitopatologici osservati nel 1939. Boll. R. Staz. patol. veg. Roma XX, 1940, No. 1, p. 4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poeteren, N. van, Verslag over de werkzaamheden van den plantenziektenkundigen dienst over het jaar 1935, p. 18, 1936.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddick, D., Necrosis of the grape vine. Bull. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. St. 263, 1909.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reddick, D., Dead-arm disease of grapes. Bull. N.Y. Agr. Exp. St. Geneva 389, 1914.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Selby, A. D. andVan Hook, J. M., Dying of bearing grape vines. Ohio Agr. Exp. St. Circ. 64, p. 1–6, 1907.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saccardo, P. A., Notae Mycologicae Series XIX. Ann. Myc. XIII, p. 115, 1915.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shear, C. L., The ascogenous form of the fungus causing dead-disease of the grape. Phytopathology I 1911, p. 116.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wehmeyer, L. E., The genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its segregates. Univ. of Michigan Studies Sc. Ser. IX, 1933, p. 110.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willison, R. S., Wound-gum in peaches and grapes. Sc. Agric. XII, 1932.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1941

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Mulder

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations