Geofisica pura e applicata

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 235–240 | Cite as

Correlations between tropospheric and ionospheric parameters

  • S. J. Bauer


This paper discusses the general aspects of troposphere-ionosphere relationships and a suggested mechanism of a possible coupling between lower and upper atmosphere. The presentation includes results of a correlation analysis surface pressure and electron density of the ionosphericF2 layer for Washington, D.C., covering a time interval of 23 months. The correlation is significant for only three months and the sign of the correlation is not consistent. The three significant correlations between surface pressure andF2 electron density occur at times of an «index cycle»; i.e., the periodic fluctuations in the zonal circulation of the atmosphere and for a month of heavy hurricane activity. The review of correlations obtained by other authors also indicates that their significant correlations occur at times when intensive changes in the tropospheric circulation occur, especially in winter and spring (the time favored by index cycles) and at the beginning and retreat of the summer monsoon in India. The variable sign of correlation between surface pressure and ionospheric characteristics is considered to be the result of the ambiguity of surface pressure as an indicator for dynamic changes in the lower atmosphere which may possibly initiate certain changes in the upper atmosphere. It is speculated that the observed correlations are the effect of upward propagation of strong disturbances from the troposphere to the ionosphere. At the present time, however, no definite conclusion can be drawn as to the reality of the suggested troposphere-ionosphere relationships.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Martyn D. F.,Proceedings of Conference on Ionospheric Physics (July 1950), Part B, Geophysics Research Paper No. 12, p. 31–33 (April 1952).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Beynon W. J. G. &Brown G. M., Nature 167; p. 1012 (1951).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Kundu M. R., Indian Journal of Physics 27, p. 235 (1953).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Gherzi E., Nature 165, p. 38 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Bauer S. J., Journal of Geophysical Research 62, p. 425 (1957).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Roberts W. O., Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 37, p. 477 (1956).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Palmer C. E., Journal of Meterorology 10, p. 1–9 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Shapiro R., Journal of Meteorology 13, 4, p. 335–340 (1956).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Woodbridge D. D., Pohrte T. W. & McDonald N., Technical Report No. 4, Institute for Solar-Terrestrial Research, High-Altitude Observatory, University of Colorado (1957).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Wexler H., Technical Report No. 2, Institute for Solar-Terrestrial Research, High-Altitude Observatory, University of Colorado, p. 21–30 (1956).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Bauer S. J., Journal of Geophysical Research, March 1958, p. 265.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Namias, J., Journal of Meteorology 7, p. 130–139 (1950).Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Treawartha G. T.,An Introduction to Climate, McGraw Hill Book Co. (1954), N. Y., p. 97–98.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Reed R. J., Journal of Meteorology, Vol. 7, No. 7, p. 253–267 (1950).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Istituto Geofisico Italiano 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Bauer
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army Signal Research and Development LaboratoryFort MonmouthUSA

Personalised recommendations